These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23189292)

  • 1. The effect of impression technique and implant angulation on the impression accuracy of external- and internal-connection implants.
    Mpikos P; Kafantaris N; Tortopidis D; Galanis C; Kaisarlis G; Koidis P
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1422-8. PubMed ID: 23189292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of 3 different impression techniques for internal connection angulated implants.
    Tsagkalidis G; Tortopidis D; Mpikos P; Kaisarlis G; Koidis P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 26213265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations.
    Al-Abdullah K; Zandparsa R; Finkelman M; Hirayama H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 23929370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of implant connection length on the dimensional impression accuracy of inclined implants.
    Ehsani S; Siadat H; Alikhasi M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(6):e315-20. PubMed ID: 24278936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of implant angulation, connection length, and impression material on the dimensional accuracy of implant impressions: an in vitro comparative study.
    Sorrentino R; Gherlone EF; Calesini G; Zarone F
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 May; 12 Suppl 1():e63-76. PubMed ID: 19438937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of implant impressions with different impression coping types and shapes.
    Rashidan N; Alikhasi M; Samadizadeh S; Beyabanaki E; Kharazifard MJ
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 19804420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of implant angulation and impression technique on impressions of NobelActive implants.
    Alexander Hazboun GB; Masri R; Romberg E; Kempler J; Driscoll CF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 May; 113(5):425-31. PubMed ID: 25749089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of accuracy of casts of multiple internal connection implant prosthesis obtained from different impression materials and techniques: an in vitro study.
    Pujari M; Garg P; Prithviraj DR
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 24456531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of two impression techniques with angulated implants.
    Conrad HJ; Pesun IJ; DeLong R; Hodges JS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6):349-56. PubMed ID: 17618917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of multi-unit implant impression: traditional techniques versus a digital procedure.
    Menini M; Setti P; Pera F; Pera P; Pesce P
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Apr; 22(3):1253-1262. PubMed ID: 28965251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of accuracy of hexed and nonhexed pickup impression copings in a multiple variable impression setup for recording multiple straight and angulated implant positions: An
    Kaur T; Singla S; Kumar L
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2023; 23(1):21-29. PubMed ID: 36588371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Verification jig for implant-supported prostheses: A comparison of standard impressions with verification jigs made of different materials.
    De La Cruz JE; Funkenbusch PD; Ercoli C; Moss ME; Graser GN; Tallents RH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Sep; 88(3):329-36. PubMed ID: 12426505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Effect of Implant Angulation on the Transfer Accuracy of External-Connection Implants.
    Alikhasi M; Siadat H; Rahimian S
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Aug; 17(4):822-9. PubMed ID: 24299654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of accuracy of complete-arch multiple-unit abutment-level dental implant impressions using different impression and splinting materials.
    Buzayan M; Baig MR; Yunus N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(6):1512-20. PubMed ID: 24278919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative evaluation of impression accuracy of tilted and straight implants in All-on-Four technique.
    Ehsani S; Siadat H; Alikhasi M
    Implant Dent; 2014 Apr; 23(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 24614881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of a digital impression system based on parallel confocal laser technology for implants with consideration of operator experience and implant angulation and depth.
    Giménez B; Özcan M; Martínez-Rus F; Pradíes G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(4):853-62. PubMed ID: 25032765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of implant angulation, impression material, and variation in arch curvature width on implant transfer model accuracy.
    Akalin ZF; Ozkan YK; Ekerim A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(1):149-57. PubMed ID: 23377060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Different Impression Techniques When Using the All-on-Four Implant Treatment Protocol.
    Siadat H; Alikhasi M; Beyabanaki E; Rahimian S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 27148987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection.
    Wenz HJ; Hertrampf K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18416411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The accuracy of implant impressions: a systematic review.
    Lee H; So JS; Hochstedler JL; Ercoli C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Oct; 100(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 18922257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.