These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23189292)

  • 21. Effects of Implant Angulation and Impression Coping Type on the Dimensional Accuracy of Impressions.
    Shim JS; Ryu JJ; Shin SW; Lee JY
    Implant Dent; 2015 Dec; 24(6):726-9. PubMed ID: 26384100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An in vitro evaluation of impression techniques for multiple internal- and external-connection implant prostheses.
    Vigolo P; Mutinelli S; Fonzi F; Stellini E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(4):807-18. PubMed ID: 25032760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The influence of implant placement depth and impression material on the stability of an open tray impression coping.
    Linkevicius T; Svediene O; Vindasiute E; Puisys A; Linkeviciene L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Oct; 108(4):238-43. PubMed ID: 23031730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracy of different impression techniques for internal-connection implants.
    Lee YJ; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 19865622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of the Accuracy of Conventional and Digital Impression Techniques for Implant Restorations.
    Moura RV; Kojima AN; Saraceni CHC; Bassolli L; Balducci I; Özcan M; Mesquita AMM
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e530-e535. PubMed ID: 29717518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Can transfer type and implant angulation affect impression accuracy? A 3D in vitro evaluation.
    Farronato D; Pasini PM; Campana V; Lops D; Azzi L; Manfredini M
    Odontology; 2021 Oct; 109(4):884-894. PubMed ID: 34075492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models.
    Choi JH; Lim YJ; Yim SH; Kim CW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Internal vs. external connections for abutments/reconstructions: a systematic review.
    Gracis S; Michalakis K; Vigolo P; Vult von Steyern P; Zwahlen M; Sailer I
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Oct; 23 Suppl 6():202-16. PubMed ID: 23062143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of dental implant angulation on the dimensional accuracy of master casts.
    Barjini N; Sayahpour S; Jafari M
    Dent Med Probl; 2021; 58(4):473-482. PubMed ID: 34994115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accuracy of impressions with different impression materials in angulated implants.
    Reddy S; Prasad K; Vakil H; Jain A; Chowdhary R
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2013; 16(3):279-84. PubMed ID: 23771446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of implant angulation, material selection, and impression technique on impression accuracy: a preliminary laboratory study.
    Rutkunas V; Sveikata K; Savickas R
    Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(5):512-5. PubMed ID: 22930776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of transfer impressions for osseointegrated implants at various angulations.
    Assuncao WG; Filho HG; Zaniquelli O
    Implant Dent; 2004 Dec; 13(4):358-66. PubMed ID: 15591998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Accuracy of impressions for internal-connection implant prostheses with various divergent angles.
    Jang HK; Kim S; Shim JS; Lee KW; Moon HS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1011-5. PubMed ID: 22010084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accuracy of a digital impression system based on active wavefront sampling technology for implants considering operator experience, implant angulation, and depth.
    Giménez B; Özcan M; Martínez-Rus F; Pradíes G
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jan; 17 Suppl 1():e54-64. PubMed ID: 23879869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of multiple use of impression copings on the accuracy of implant transfer.
    Alikhasi M; Bassir SH; Naini RB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):408-14. PubMed ID: 23527342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of Implant Angulation and Depth on the Accuracy of Casts Using the Open Tray Splinted Impression Technique.
    Taduri T; Mathur S; Upadhyay S; Patel K; Shah M
    J Oral Implantol; 2021 Dec; 47(6):447-454. PubMed ID: 33270885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Accuracy of impressions of multiple implants in the edentulous arch: a systematic review.
    Baig MR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(4):869-80. PubMed ID: 25032767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Accuracy of two digital implant impression systems based on confocal microscopy with variations in customized software and clinical parameters.
    Giménez B; Pradíes G; Martínez-Rus F; Özcan M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 25615916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.