These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23189292)

  • 41. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
    Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Do Type and Shape of Scan Bodies Affect Accuracy and Time of Digital Implant Impressions?
    Moslemion M; Payaminia L; Jalali H; Alikhasi M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2020 Feb; 28(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 32036633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Digital evaluation of the accuracy of impression techniques and materials in angulated implants.
    Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S; Ozan O; Ozcelik TB; Yagiz A
    J Dent; 2014 Dec; 42(12):1551-9. PubMed ID: 25446736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Axial displacements in external and internal implant-abutment connection.
    Lee JH; Kim DG; Park CJ; Cho LR
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Feb; 25(2):e83-9. PubMed ID: 23088616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effect of modified tray design on accuracy of different impression techniques for parallel and divergent implants.
    Dang L; Woliansky M; Palamara J; Abduo J
    J Oral Sci; 2020 Sep; 62(4):439-443. PubMed ID: 32908080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effect of splinting in accuracy of two implant impression techniques.
    de Avila ED; de Matos Moraes F; Castanharo SM; Del'Acqua MA; de Assis Mollo F
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):633-9. PubMed ID: 25506658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Accuracy of various impression materials and methods for two implant systems: An effect size study.
    Schmidt A; Häussling T; Rehmann P; Schaaf H; Wöstmann B
    J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Apr; 62(2):245-251. PubMed ID: 29191609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes.
    Papaspyridakos P; Gallucci GO; Chen CJ; Hanssen S; Naert I; Vandenberghe B
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Apr; 27(4):465-72. PubMed ID: 25682892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Accuracy of Impression Techniques for Dental Implants Placed in Five Different Orientations.
    Kim HS; Lee JH; Lee SY
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(5):997-1002. PubMed ID: 36170315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Three-dimensional accuracy of a digitally coded healing abutment implant impression system.
    Ng SD; Tan KB; Teoh KH; Cheng AC; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(4):927-36. PubMed ID: 25032774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Assessment of impression material accuracy in complete-arch restorations on four implants.
    Baldissara P; Koci B; Messias AM; Meneghello R; Ghelli F; Gatto MR; Ciocca L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Dec; 126(6):763-771. PubMed ID: 33526247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Three-dimensional accuracy of implant and abutment level impression techniques: effect on marginal discrepancy.
    Alikhasi M; Siadat H; Monzavi A; Momen-Heravi F
    J Oral Implantol; 2011 Dec; 37(6):649-57. PubMed ID: 20594060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Accuracy of implant impressions for partially and completely edentulous patients: a systematic review.
    Papaspyridakos P; Chen CJ; Gallucci GO; Doukoudakis A; Weber HP; Chronopoulos V
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(4):836-45. PubMed ID: 25032763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 2 - comparison of splinting techniques.
    Filho HG; Mazaro JV; Vedovatto E; Assunção WG; dos Santos PH
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 19178624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Full-arch implant fixed prostheses: a comparative study on the effect of connection type and impression technique on accuracy of fit.
    Papaspyridakos P; Hirayama H; Chen CJ; Ho CH; Chronopoulos V; Weber HP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1099-105. PubMed ID: 26374268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Assessment of Effect of Implant Angulation and Implant Number on the Dimensional Accuracy of Definitive Casts.
    Kaur G; Baweja PS; Saini RS; Singh IP; Sharma T; Singh S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Apr; 22(4):394-399. PubMed ID: 34267009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Accuracy of Different Implant Impression Techniques: Evaluation of New Tray Design Concept.
    Liu DY; Cader FN; Abduo J; Palamara J
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e682-e687. PubMed ID: 29286181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Implant cast accuracy as a function of impression techniques and impression material viscosity.
    Walker MP; Ries D; Borello B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):669-74. PubMed ID: 18807563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Accuracy of 2 impression techniques for ITI implants.
    Akça K; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 15346748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparative Study of Dimensional Accuracy in Three Dental Implant Impression Techniques: Open Tray, Closed Tray with Impression Coping, and Snap Cap.
    Izadi A; Heidari B; Roshanaei G; Allahbakhshi H; Fotovat F
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Aug; 19(8):974-981. PubMed ID: 30150500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.