These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23189302)

  • 1. Use of 8-mm and 9-mm implants in atrophic alveolar ridges: 10-year results.
    Mertens C; Meyer-Bäumer A; Kappel H; Hoffmann J; Steveling HG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1501-8. PubMed ID: 23189302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does crown/implant ratio influence the survival and marginal bone level of short single implants in the mandibular molar? A preliminary investigation consisting of 12 patients.
    Ghariani L; Segaan L; Rayyan MM; Galli S; Jimbo R; Ibrahim A
    J Oral Rehabil; 2016 Feb; 43(2):127-35. PubMed ID: 26333185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rehabilitation of reabsorbed maxillae with implants in buttresses in patients with combination syndrome.
    Peñarrocha M; Viña JA; Carrillo C; Peñarrocha D; Peñarrocha M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 May; 70(5):e322-30. PubMed ID: 22538025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-year analysis of zirconia implants used for single-tooth replacement and three-unit fixed dental prostheses: A prospective multicenter study.
    Balmer M; Spies BC; Vach K; Kohal RJ; Hämmerle CHF; Jung RE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Mar; 29(3):290-299. PubMed ID: 29330869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retrospective study of short and extra-short implants placed in posterior regions: influence of crown-to-implant ratio on marginal bone loss.
    Anitua E; Piñas L; Orive G
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Feb; 17(1):102-10. PubMed ID: 23656303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Survival Rates of Short Dental Implants (≤ 6.5 mm) Placed in Posterior Edentulous Ridges and Factors Affecting their Survival after a 12-Month Follow-up Period: A Systematic Review.
    Al-Johany SS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):605–621. PubMed ID: 30703180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ridge expansion alone or in combination with guided bone regeneration to facilitate implant placement in narrow alveolar ridges: a retrospective study.
    Tang YL; Yuan J; Song YL; Ma W; Chao X; Li DH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Feb; 26(2):204-11. PubMed ID: 24330035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A 10-year prospective study of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region. II: Influence of the crown-to-implant ratio and different prosthetic treatment modalities on crestal bone loss.
    Blanes RJ; Bernard JP; Blanes ZM; Belser UC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Dec; 18(6):707-14. PubMed ID: 17697000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Immediate occlusal loading of NanoTite PREVAIL implants: a prospective 1-year clinical and radiographic study.
    Ostman PO; Wennerberg A; Albrektsson T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Mar; 12(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 20148916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Immediate and early loading of Straumann implants with a chemically modified surface (SLActive) in the posterior mandible and maxilla: 1-year results from a prospective multicenter study.
    Ganeles J; Zöllner A; Jackowski J; ten Bruggenkate C; Beagle J; Guerra F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1119-28. PubMed ID: 18983314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Short implants with oxidized surface in posterior areas of atrophic jaws: 3- to 5-year results of a multicenter study.
    De Santis D; Cucchi A; Rigoni G; Longhi C
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 17(3):442-52. PubMed ID: 23915197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A long-term retrospective study of two different implant surfaces placed after reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla using Le Fort I osteotomy and interpositional bone grafting.
    Marchetti C; Pieri F; Corinaldesi G; Degidi M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(5):911-8. PubMed ID: 19014162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implant placement in the atrophic posterior maxilla with sinus elevation without bone grafting: a 2-year prospective study.
    Rajkumar GC; Aher V; Ramaiya S; Manjunath GS; Kumar DV
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):526-30. PubMed ID: 23527355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A 5-year longitudinal study of the clinical effectiveness of ITI solid-screw implants in the treatment of mandibular edentulism.
    Behneke A; Behneke N; d'Hoedt B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(6):799-810. PubMed ID: 12507239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rehabilitation of the Atrophic Posterior Maxilla Using Splinted Short Implants or Sinus Augmentation with Standard-Length Implants: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Pieri F; Caselli E; Forlivesi C; Corinaldesi G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1179-88. PubMed ID: 27632276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retrospective clinical evaluation of an internal tube-in-tube dental implant after 4 years, with special emphasis on peri-implant bone resorption.
    Al-Nawas B; Kämmerer PW; Morbach T; Ophoven F; Wagner W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1309-16. PubMed ID: 22167438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical outcome of root-shaped dental implants of various diameters: 5-year results.
    Krennmair G; Seemann R; Schmidinger S; Ewers R; Piehslinger E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):357-66. PubMed ID: 20369096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preliminary 2-year report on treatment outcomes for 6-mm-long implants in posterior atrophic mandibles.
    Pieri F; Aldini NN; Fini M; Marchetti C; Corinaldesi G
    Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(3):279-89. PubMed ID: 22545259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomized clinical trial to evaluate and compare implants placed in augmented versus non-augmented extraction sockets: 3-year results.
    Barone A; Orlando B; Cingano L; Marconcini S; Derchi G; Covani U
    J Periodontol; 2012 Jul; 83(7):836-46. PubMed ID: 22141358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. One-step surgical placement of Brånemark implants: a prospective multicenter clinical study.
    Becker W; Becker BE; Israelson H; Lucchini JP; Handelsman M; Ammons W; Rosenberg E; Rose L; Tucker LM; Lekholm U
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(4):454-62. PubMed ID: 9274074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.