867 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23189311)
1. Patient preference and satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or locator attachments: a crossover clinical trial.
Krennmair G; Seemann R; Fazekas A; Ewers R; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1560-8. PubMed ID: 23189311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of ball and telescopic crown attachments in implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 5-year prospective study.
Krennmair G; Seemann R; Weinländer M; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):598-606. PubMed ID: 21691608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patient satisfaction with two designs of implant supported removable overdentures; ball attachment and magnets.
Ellis JS; Burawi G; Walls A; Thomason JM
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1293-8. PubMed ID: 19832769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or telescopic crown attachments: a 3-year prospective study.
Krennmair G; Weinländer M; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 16602365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A 3-year prospective clinical study of telescopic crown, bar, and locator attachments for removable four implant-supported maxillary overdentures.
Zou D; Wu Y; Huang W; Wang F; Wang S; Zhang Z; Zhang Z
Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(6):566-73. PubMed ID: 24179972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Removable four implant-supported mandibular overdentures rigidly retained with telescopic crowns or milled bars: a 3-year prospective study.
Krennmair G; Sütö D; Seemann R; Piehslinger E
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):481-8. PubMed ID: 21504478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results.
MacEntee MI; Walton JN; Glick N
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 15623995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: a cross-over clinical trial.
Cune M; van Kampen F; van der Bilt A; Bosman F
Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 15889656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Patient satisfaction with different types of implant-retained overdentures in the edentate mandible].
Cune MS; van Kampen FM; van der Bilt A
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2006 Oct; 113(10):401-7. PubMed ID: 17058761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Angled ball and locator attachments for immediate loaded inclined implants used to retain maxillary overdentures: A cross over study of patient satisfaction and oral health related quality of life.
Aboelez MA; Elezz MGA; Abdraboh AE; Elsyad MA
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2022 Jun; 24(3):391-400. PubMed ID: 35503746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mandibular overdentures retained by two implants: 10-year results from a crossover clinical trial comparing ball-socket and bar-clip attachments.
Cune M; Burgers M; van Kampen F; de Putter C; van der Bilt A
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(4):310-7. PubMed ID: 20617218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of three-implant-supported fixed dentures and two-implant-retained overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a pilot study of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction.
De Kok IJ; Chang KH; Lu TS; Cooper LF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 21483895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implant-retained prostheses: ball vs. conus attachments - A randomized controlled clinical trial.
Cepa S; Koller B; Spies BC; Stampf S; Kohal RJ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Feb; 28(2):177-185. PubMed ID: 26813242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patient-based and clinical outcomes of implant telescopic attachment-retained mandibular overdentures: a 1-year longitudinal prospective study.
Yunus N; Saub R; Taiyeb Ali TB; Salleh NM; Baig MR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1149-56. PubMed ID: 25216142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Randomized, prospective, clinical evaluation of prosthodontic modalities for mandibular implant overdenture treatment.
Burns DR; Unger JW; Coffey JP; Waldrop TC; Elswick RK
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jul; 106(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 21723989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patient satisfaction with maxillary 3-implant overdentures using different attachment systems opposing mandibular 2-implant overdentures.
Al-Zubeidi MI; Alsabeeha NH; Thomson WM; Payne AG
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e11-9. PubMed ID: 21414137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with a milled bar: a retrospective study.
Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):987-94. PubMed ID: 18271381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with resilient liner and clip attachments for bar- and implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 3-year randomized clinical study.
ELsyad MA
Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 22371836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Bar, Telescopic, and Locator Attachments for Implant-Stabilized Overdentures in Patients with Mandibular Atrophied Ridges: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
ElSyad MA; Denewar BA; Elsaih EA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):1103-1111. PubMed ID: 30231098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Single unit attachments improve peri-implant soft tissue conditions in mandibular overdentures supported by four implants.
Cordaro L; di Torresanto VM; Petricevic N; Jornet PR; Torsello F
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 May; 24(5):536-42. PubMed ID: 22320359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
