These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23189315)

  • 1. Biomechanical comparison of a single short and wide implant with monocortical or bicortical engagement in the atrophic posterior maxilla and a long implant in the augmented sinus.
    Chang SH; Lin CL; Lin YS; Hsue SS; Huang SR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):e102-11. PubMed ID: 23189315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical effects of different fixed partial denture designs planned on bicortically anchored short, graft-supported long, or 45-degree-inclined long implants in the posterior maxilla: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Seker E; Ulusoy M; Ozan O; Doğan DÖ; Seker BK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(1):e1-9. PubMed ID: 24451875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical effects of a maxillary implant in the augmented sinus: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chen CC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 19587867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Single Implant-Supported Prostheses in the Anterior Maxilla, with Different Surgical Techniques and Implant Types.
    Verri FR; Santiago JF; Almeida DA; de Souza Batista VE; Araujo Lemos CA; Mello CC; Pellizzer EP
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(4):e191-e198. PubMed ID: 28708909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-dimensional finite-element analysis of functional stresses in different bone locations produced by implants placed in the maxillary posterior region of the sinus floor.
    Koca OL; Eskitascioglu G; Usumez A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 15623996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical evaluation of implant-supported prosthesis with various tilting implant angles and bone types in atrophic maxilla: A finite element study.
    Gümrükçü Z; Korkmaz YT; Korkmaz FM
    Comput Biol Med; 2017 Jul; 86():47-54. PubMed ID: 28500959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Finite element analysis of zygomatic implants in intrasinus and extramaxillary approaches for prosthetic rehabilitation in severely atrophic maxillae.
    Ishak MI; Kadir MR; Sulaiman E; Kasim NH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(3):e151-60. PubMed ID: 23748334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of implant stability in the atrophic posterior maxilla: a mathematical study of the sinus floor augmentation.
    Tepper G; Haas R; Zechner W; Krach W; Watzek G
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Dec; 13(6):657-65. PubMed ID: 12519342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of the biomechanical feasibility of a wide implant in moderately atrophic maxillary sinus region with finite element method.
    Li T; Yang X; Zhang D; Zhou H; Shao J; Ding Y; Kong L
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Aug; 114(2):e1-8. PubMed ID: 22769414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Regular and platform switching: bone stress analysis varying implant type.
    Gurgel-Juarez NC; de Almeida EO; Rocha EP; Freitas AC; Anchieta RB; de Vargas LC; Kina S; França FM
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 22372756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical analysis of the effects of implant diameter and bone quality in short implants placed in the atrophic posterior maxilla.
    Chang SH; Lin CL; Hsue SS; Lin YS; Huang SR
    Med Eng Phys; 2012 Mar; 34(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 21807548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A three-dimensional finite element analysis of short dental implants in the posterior maxilla.
    Kim S; Kim S; Choi H; Woo D; Park YB; Shim JS; Kim HS; Lee KW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(2):e155-64. PubMed ID: 24683580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the effect of an offset implant configuration in the posterior maxilla with external hexagon implant platform: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    de Souza Batista VE; Verri FR; Almeida DAF; Santiago Junior JF; Lemos CAA; Pellizzer EP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):363-371. PubMed ID: 28222876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Anterior Single Implant-Supported Prostheses with Different Bone Anchorages.
    Verri FR; Santiago Júnior JF; Almeida DA; Verri AC; Batista VE; Lemos CA; Noritomi PY; Pellizzer EP
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2015; 2015():321528. PubMed ID: 26351654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Extramaxillary Anchored Implants, Tilted Implants, or Sinus Elevation Concepts on Stress Distribution in Atrophic Maxilla: A Finite Element Analysis.
    Sivrikaya EC; Yilmaz O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(3):563-570. PubMed ID: 35727249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical comparison of sinus floor elevation and alternative treatment methods for dental implant placement.
    Küçükkurt S; Alpaslan G; Kurt A
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 Feb; 20(3):284-293. PubMed ID: 27501343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bone-implant interface with simulated insertion stress around an immediately loaded dental implant in the anterior maxilla: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Lee JS; Cho IH; Kim YS; Heo SJ; Kwon HB; Lim YJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 22442767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical Effect of Prosthetic Connection and Implant Body Shape in Low-Quality Bone of Maxillary Posterior Single Implant-Supported Restorations.
    de Andrade CL; Carvalho MA; Del Bel Cury AA; Sotto-Maior BS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):e92-7. PubMed ID: 27447166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical response of implant systems placed in the maxillary posterior region under various conditions of angulation, bone density, and loading.
    Lin CL; Wang JC; Ramp LC; Liu PR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 18416413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of the implant design on peri-implant bone stress and abutment micromovement: three-dimensional finite element analysis of original computer-aided design models.
    Yamanishi Y; Yamaguchi S; Imazato S; Nakano T; Yatani H
    J Periodontol; 2014 Sep; 85(9):e333-8. PubMed ID: 24835549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.