These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23189315)

  • 21. Bone loading pattern around implants in average and atrophic edentulous maxillae: a finite-element analysis.
    Meyer U; Vollmer D; Runte C; Bourauel C; Joos U
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2001 Apr; 29(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 11465432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Factorial analysis of variables influencing mechanical characteristics of a single tooth implant placed in the maxilla using finite element analysis and the statistics-based Taguchi method.
    Lin CL; Chang SH; Chang WJ; Kuo YC
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2007 Oct; 115(5):408-16. PubMed ID: 17850430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Biomechanical effect of platform switching in implant dentistry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Chang CL; Chen CS; Hsu ML
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 20369087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Rehabilitation of Atrophic Posterior Maxilla with Pterygoid Implants: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Wilkirson E; Chandran R; Duan Y
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(3):e51-e62. PubMed ID: 34115067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparing the influence of crestal cortical bone and sinus floor cortical bone in posterior maxilla bi-cortical dental implantation: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Yan X; Zhang X; Chi W; Ai H; Wu L
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2015 May; 73(4):312-20. PubMed ID: 25330164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of different abutment diameter of implants on the peri-implant stress in the crestal bone: A three-dimensional finite element analysis--In vitro study.
    Aradya A; Kumar UK; Chowdhary R
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 27054866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of platform connection and abutment material on stress distribution in single anterior implant-supported restorations: a nonlinear 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Carvalho MA; Sotto-Maior BS; Del Bel Cury AA; Pessanha Henriques GE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1096-102. PubMed ID: 24831744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Influence of tapered and external hexagon connections on bone stresses around tilted dental implants: three-dimensional finite element method with statistical analysis.
    de Faria Almeida DA; Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; Santiago JF; de Carvalho PS
    J Periodontol; 2014 Feb; 85(2):261-9. PubMed ID: 23688104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Outcomes of 6.5-mm Hydrophilic Implants and Long Implants Placed with Lateral Sinus Floor Elevation in the Atrophic Posterior Maxilla: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Comparison.
    Yu H; Wang X; Qiu L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 19(1):111-122. PubMed ID: 27436543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone.
    Quaresma SE; Cury PR; Sendyk WR; Sendyk C
    J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18390236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Analysis of the effect of mesial implant position on surrounding bone stress of mandibular edentulous jaw under dynamic loads].
    Li Y; Sun C; Jia H; Luo XJ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):672-677. PubMed ID: 29972946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of Platform Switching on Crestal Bone Stress in Tapered and Cylindrical Implants: A Finite Element Analysis.
    Rasouli-Ghahroudi AA; Geramy A; Yaghobee S; Khorsand A; Yousefifakhr H; Rokn A; Soolari A
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2015 Jan; 17(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 26233968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of abutment angulation on the strain on the bone around an implant in the anterior maxilla: a finite element study.
    Saab XE; Griggs JA; Powers JM; Engelmeier RL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Feb; 97(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 17341376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Augmentation of the atrophic maxillary sinus floor: graft stiffness, implant shape and length.
    La Barbera L; Corbella S; Taschieri S; Galbusera F; Giannì AB; Francetti L
    J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2018; 32(5):1295-1301. PubMed ID: 30334429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sinus elevation with a cortical bone graft block: a patient-specific three-dimensional finite element study.
    Schuller-Götzburg P; Entacher K; Petutschnigg A; Pomwenger W; Watzinger F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):359-68. PubMed ID: 22442776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of Implant Length and Diameter, Bicortical Anchorage, and Sinus Augmentation on Bone Stress Distribution: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Moriwaki H; Yamaguchi S; Nakano T; Yamanishi Y; Imazato S; Yatani H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):e84-91. PubMed ID: 27447165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Finite element analysis of implant-supported prosthesis with pontic and cantilever in the posterior maxilla.
    de Souza Batista VE; Verri FR; Almeida DA; Santiago Junior JF; Lemos CA; Pellizzer EP
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 May; 20(6):663-670. PubMed ID: 28349769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Titanium versus zirconia implants supporting maxillary overdentures: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Osman RB; Elkhadem AH; Ma S; Swain MV
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(5):e198-208. PubMed ID: 24066336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A finite element study of short dental implants in the posterior maxilla.
    van Staden RC; Li X; Guan H; Johnson NW; Reher P; Loo YC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(2):e147-54. PubMed ID: 24683579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.