BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23190327)

  • 1. The representation of audiovisual regularities in the human brain.
    Besle J; Hussain Z; Giard MH; Bertrand O
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 Mar; 25(3):365-73. PubMed ID: 23190327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Human visual system automatically encodes sequential regularities of discrete events.
    Kimura M; Schröger E; Czigler I; Ohira H
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jun; 22(6):1124-39. PubMed ID: 19583466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is the auditory sensory memory sensitive to visual information?
    Besle J; Fort A; Giard MH
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 166(3-4):337-44. PubMed ID: 16041497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The whole is more than the sum of its parts - audiovisual processing of phonemes investigated with ERPs.
    Hessler D; Jonkers R; Stowe L; Bastiaanse R
    Brain Lang; 2013 Mar; 124(3):213-24. PubMed ID: 23395711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Deviance detection in congruent audiovisual speech: evidence for implicit integrated audiovisual memory representations.
    Winkler I; Horváth J; Weisz J; Trejo LJ
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Dec; 82(3):281-92. PubMed ID: 19733617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neural correlates of audiovisual integration of semantic category information.
    Hu Z; Zhang R; Zhang Q; Liu Q; Li H
    Brain Lang; 2012 Apr; 121(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 22330797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Top-down attention affects sequential regularity representation in the human visual system.
    Kimura M; Widmann A; Schröger E
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Aug; 77(2):126-34. PubMed ID: 20478347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The representation of unattended, segmented sounds: a mismatch negativity (MMN) study.
    Weise A; Ritter W; Schröger E
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Aug; 81(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 21600937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differential deviant probability effects on two hierarchical levels of the auditory novelty system.
    López-Caballero F; Zarnowiec K; Escera C
    Biol Psychol; 2016 Oct; 120():1-9. PubMed ID: 27497593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automatic auditory change detection in humans is influenced by visual-auditory associative learning.
    Laine M; Kwon MS; Hämäläinen H
    Neuroreport; 2007 Oct; 18(16):1697-701. PubMed ID: 17921871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Functional dissociation between regularity encoding and deviance detection along the auditory hierarchy.
    Aghamolaei M; Zarnowiec K; Grimm S; Escera C
    Eur J Neurosci; 2016 Feb; 43(4):529-35. PubMed ID: 26613542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When sound and picture do not fit: Mismatch negativity and sensory interaction.
    Ullsperger P; Erdmann U; Freude G; Dehoff W
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Jan; 59(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 16290115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. First-impression bias effects on mismatch negativity to auditory spatial deviants.
    Fitzgerald K; Provost A; Todd J
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Apr; 55(4):. PubMed ID: 28972671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Early auditory change detection implicitly facilitated by ignored concurrent visual change during a Braille reading task.
    Aoyama A; Haruyama T; Kuriki S
    J Integr Neurosci; 2013 Sep; 12(3):385-99. PubMed ID: 24070061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MMN or no MMN: no magnitude of deviance effect on the MMN amplitude.
    Horváth J; Czigler I; Jacobsen T; Maess B; Schröger E; Winkler I
    Psychophysiology; 2008 Jan; 45(1):60-9. PubMed ID: 17868262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lasting first impressions: a conservative bias in automatic filters of the acoustic environment.
    Todd J; Provost A; Cooper G
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Oct; 49(12):3399-405. PubMed ID: 21872613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Audiovisual interaction enhances auditory detection in late stage: an event-related potential study.
    Li Q; Wu J; Touge T
    Neuroreport; 2010 Feb; 21(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 20065887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditory deviance detection revisited: evidence for a hierarchical novelty system.
    Grimm S; Escera C
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Jul; 85(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 21669238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.