These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23190445)

  • 41. Surgery for low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society Clinical Practice Guideline.
    Chou R; Baisden J; Carragee EJ; Resnick DK; Shaffer WO; Loeser JD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(10):1094-109. PubMed ID: 19363455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Cost effectiveness analysis of graft options in spinal fusion surgery using a Markov model.
    Virk S; Sandhu HS; Khan SN
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Oct; 25(7):E204-10. PubMed ID: 22820278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Impact of magnetic resonance therapy on sickness absence of patients with nerve root irritation following a lumbar disc problem].
    Salomonowitz G; Salfinger H; Hahne J; Friedrich M
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2011 Oct; 149(5):575-81. PubMed ID: 21984428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Discogenic low back pain and degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis - how appropriate is surgical treatment?].
    Mayer HM
    Schmerz; 2001 Dec; 15(6):484-91. PubMed ID: 11793155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Indirect costs associated with surgery for low back pain-a secondary analysis of clinical trial data.
    Fayssoux R; Goldfarb NI; Vaccaro AR; Harrop J
    Popul Health Manag; 2010 Feb; 13(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 20158318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Financial Aspects of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review of Recent Literature.
    Reyes AA; Canseco JA; Jeyamohan H; Grasso G; Vaccaro AR
    World Neurosurg; 2020 Aug; 140():534-540. PubMed ID: 32353543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Lumbar disc arthroplasty with Maverick disc versus stand-alone interbody fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption trial.
    Gornet MF; Burkus JK; Dryer RF; Peloza JH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(25):E1600-11. PubMed ID: 21415812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A 6.5-year follow-up of 14 patients who underwent ProDisc total disc arthroplasty for combined long-standing degenerative lumbar disc disease and recent disc herniation.
    Markwalder TM; Wenger M; Marbacher S
    J Clin Neurosci; 2011 Dec; 18(12):1677-81. PubMed ID: 22099076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Clinical outcome of lumbar total disc replacement using ProDisc-L in degenerative disc disease: minimum 5-year follow-up results at a single institute.
    Park CK; Ryu KS; Lee KY; Lee HJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Apr; 37(8):672-7. PubMed ID: 21857395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Persistent pain following lumbar disc replacement.
    Wininger KL; Deshpande KK; Bester ML
    Radiol Technol; 2012; 83(5):430-6. PubMed ID: 22596021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. How does accounting for worker productivity affect the measured cost-effectiveness of lumbar discectomy?
    Koenig L; Dall TM; Gu Q; Saavoss J; Schafer MF
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Apr; 472(4):1069-79. PubMed ID: 24385039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The future of disc surgery and regeneration.
    Buser Z; Chung AS; Abedi A; Wang JC
    Int Orthop; 2019 Apr; 43(4):995-1002. PubMed ID: 30506089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Cost-effectiveness of lumbar fusion and nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain in the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group.
    Fritzell P; Hägg O; Jonsson D; Nordwall A;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):421-34; discussion Z3. PubMed ID: 15094539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Stein SC; Malhotra NR; Burnett MG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Apr; 20(4):474. PubMed ID: 24527823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Analyses in U.S. Spine Surgery.
    Chang D; Zygourakis CC; Wadhwa H; Kahn JG
    World Neurosurg; 2020 Oct; 142():e32-e57. PubMed ID: 32446983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Do bacteria play an important role in the pathogenesis of low back pain?
    Fisher TJ; Osti OL
    ANZ J Surg; 2015 Nov; 85(11):808-14. PubMed ID: 25648861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Comparative analysis of the professional activity in patients with discopathy of the lumbar spine receiving only conservative therapy or operative therapy].
    Radziszewski KR
    Wiad Lek; 2007; 60(1-2):15-21. PubMed ID: 17607963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Cost-effectiveness of lumbar discectomy for the treatment of herniated intervertebral disc.
    Malter AD; Larson EB; Urban N; Deyo RA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 May; 21(9):1048-54; discussion 1055. PubMed ID: 8724089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Evaluation of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in the management of patients with discogenic lumbar radiculopathy.
    Omar AS; Awadalla MA; El-Latif MA
    Int J Rheum Dis; 2012 Oct; 15(5):e101-8. PubMed ID: 23083041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Economic evaluation of a behavioral-graded activity program compared to physical therapy for patients following lumbar disc surgery.
    Ostelo RW; Goossens ME; de Vet HC; van den Brandt PA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Mar; 29(6):615-22. PubMed ID: 15014270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.