279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23190715)
1. Comparison of topcon optical coherence tomography and ultrasound pachymetry.
Northey LC; Gifford P; Boneham GC
Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Dec; 89(12):1708-14. PubMed ID: 23190715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative study of central corneal thickness using Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography versus ultrasound pachymetry in primary open-angle glaucoma.
Garcia-Medina JJ; Garcia-Medina M; Garcia-Maturana C; Zanon-Moreno V; Pons-Vazquez S; Pinazo-Duran MD
Cornea; 2013 Jan; 32(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 22495027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using optical low-coherence reflectometry, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography, and Scheimpflug camera.
Gonul S; Koktekir BE; Bakbak B; Gedik S
Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2014; 77(6):345-50. PubMed ID: 25627178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measurement of central corneal thickness by high-resolution Scheimpflug imaging, Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography and ultrasound pachymetry.
Chen S; Huang J; Wen D; Chen W; Huang D; Wang Q
Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Aug; 90(5):449-55. PubMed ID: 20560892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measured by Standard Ultrasound Pachymetry, Corneal Topography, Tono-Pachymetry and Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography.
González-Pérez J; Queiruga Piñeiro J; Sánchez García Á; González Méijome JM
Curr Eye Res; 2018 Jul; 43(7):866-872. PubMed ID: 29634372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness with Ultrasound Pachymetry, Noncontact Specular Microscopy and Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography.
Erdur SK; Demirci G; Dikkaya F; Kocabora MS; Ozsutcu M
Semin Ophthalmol; 2018; 33(6):782-787. PubMed ID: 29509052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Corneal thickness mapping by 3D swept-source anterior segment optical coherence tomography.
Neri A; Malori M; Scaroni P; Leaci R; Delfini E; Macaluso C
Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Sep; 90(6):e452-7. PubMed ID: 22682316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dependability of posterior-segment spectral domain optical coherence tomography for measuring central corneal thickness.
Correa-Pérez ME; Olmo N; López-Miguel A; Fernández I; Coco-Martín MB; Maldonado MJ
Cornea; 2014 Nov; 33(11):1219-24. PubMed ID: 25211358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative study of central corneal thickness measurement with slit-lamp optical coherence tomography and visante optical coherence tomography.
Li H; Leung CK; Wong L; Cheung CY; Pang CP; Weinreb RN; Lam DS
Ophthalmology; 2008 May; 115(5):796-801.e2. PubMed ID: 17916376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Agreement and repeatability of central corneal thickness measurements by four different optical devices and an ultrasound pachymeter.
Gokcinar NB; Yumusak E; Ornek N; Yorubulut S; Onaran Z
Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Jul; 39(7):1589-1598. PubMed ID: 29984376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements Using Ultrasonic Pachymetry, Anterior Segment OCT and Noncontact Specular Microscopy.
Scotto R; Bagnis A; Papadia M; Cutolo CA; Risso D; Traverso CE
J Glaucoma; 2017 Oct; 26(10):860-865. PubMed ID: 28834824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Repeatability and agreement of central corneal thickness measurement with non-contact methods: a comparative study.
Mansoori T; Balakrishna N
Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 38(3):959-966. PubMed ID: 28434071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of central corneal thickness measurement with RTVue spectral domain optical coherence tomography in normal subjects.
Rao HL; Kumar AU; Kumar A; Chary S; Senthil S; Vaddavalli PK; Garudadri CS
Cornea; 2011 Feb; 30(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 20885314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Precision of high definition spectral-domain optical coherence tomography for measuring central corneal thickness.
Correa-Pérez ME; López-Miguel A; Miranda-Anta S; Iglesias-Cortiñas D; Alió JL; Maldonado MJ
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Apr; 53(4):1752-7. PubMed ID: 22395881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Comparison between Scheimpflug imaging and optical coherence tomography in measuring corneal thickness.
Huang J; Ding X; Savini G; Pan C; Feng Y; Cheng D; Hua Y; Hu X; Wang Q
Ophthalmology; 2013 Oct; 120(10):1951-8. PubMed ID: 23672973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vivo evaluation of the cornea and conjunctiva of the normal laboratory beagle using time- and Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography and ultrasound pachymetry.
Strom AR; Cortés DE; Rasmussen CA; Thomasy SM; McIntyre K; Lee SF; Kass PH; Mannis MJ; Murphy CJ
Vet Ophthalmol; 2016 Jan; 19(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 25676065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of Cirrus HD-OCT and Topcon SP-3000P for measuring central corneal thickness.
Calvo-Sanz JA; Ruiz-Alcocer J; Sánchez-Tena MA
J Optom; 2018; 11(3):192-197. PubMed ID: 28254359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Central corneal thickness measurements obtained with anterior segment spectral domain optical coherence tomography compared to ultrasound pachymetry in healthy subjects.
Vollmer L; Sowka J; Pizzimenti J; Yu X
Optometry; 2012 May; 83(5):167-72. PubMed ID: 23249119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comprehensive comparison of central corneal thickness measurement.
Huang J; Pesudovs K; Yu A; Wright T; Wen D; Li M; Yu Y; Wang Q
Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Aug; 88(8):940-9. PubMed ID: 21602731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Reproducibility of the measurement of central corneal thickness in healthy subjects obtained with the optical low coherence reflectometry pachymeter and comparison with the ultrasonic pachymetry].
Garza-Leon M; Plancarte-Lozano E; Valle-Penella AD; Guzmán-Martínez ML; Villarreal-González A
Cir Cir; 2018; 86(1):50-55. PubMed ID: 29681640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
