BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23192093)

  • 1. Quality control phantom for flat panel detector X-ray systems.
    Chida K; Kaga Y; Haga Y; Takeda K; Zuguchi M
    Health Phys; 2013 Jan; 104(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 23192093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Rotatable Quality Control Phantom for Evaluating the Performance of Flat Panel Detectors in Imaging Moving Objects.
    Haga Y; Chida K; Inaba Y; Kaga Y; Meguro T; Zuguchi M
    J Digit Imaging; 2016 Feb; 29(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 26264731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Canon's flat-panel detector].
    Matsumoto M; Sumida I; Ideguchi T; Kawaji Y; Himuro K
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):232-45. PubMed ID: 12766269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dual-energy cardiac imaging: an image quality and dose comparison for a flat-panel detector and x-ray image intensifier.
    Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):183-96. PubMed ID: 17183135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Flat-panel detector technology -State-of-the-art and future prospects-].
    Yamazaki T
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):216-26. PubMed ID: 12766267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and effective dose using four digital systems.
    Pascoal A; Lawinski CP; Mackenzie A; Tabakov S; Lewis CA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):273-7. PubMed ID: 15933121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The design and imaging characteristics of dynamic, solid-state, flat-panel x-ray image detectors for digital fluoroscopy and fluorography.
    Cowen AR; Davies AG; Sivananthan MU
    Clin Radiol; 2008 Oct; 63(10):1073-85. PubMed ID: 18774353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The use of flat-panel detectors for CT imaging].
    Kalender WA
    Radiologe; 2003 May; 43(5):379-87. PubMed ID: 12764587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: physics of flat-panel fluoroscopy systems: Survey of modern fluoroscopy imaging: flat-panel detectors versus image intensifiers and more.
    Nickoloff EL
    Radiographics; 2011; 31(2):591-602. PubMed ID: 21415199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Hologic's Flat-Panel Detector].
    Ogata Y; Matsumoto M; Suekane K
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):264-75. PubMed ID: 12766272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of radiographic image quality parameters obtained with the REX simulator.
    Magalhaes LA; Drexler GG; deAlmeida CE
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov; 147(4):614-8. PubMed ID: 21273198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Flat-panel detectors in X-ray systems].
    Spahn M; Heer V; Freytag R
    Radiologe; 2003 May; 43(5):340-50. PubMed ID: 12764582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Physical imaging properties of a flat panel X-ray detector system].
    Yoshida A; Nakamura S; Nishihara S; Kohama C; Takahata A; Fujikawa K
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):246-54. PubMed ID: 12766270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of image quality and radiation dose between an image-intensifier system and a newer-generation flat-panel detector system — technical phantom measurements and evaluation of clinical imaging in children.
    Weis M; Hagelstein C; Diehm T; Schoenberg SO; Neff KW
    Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Feb; 46(2):286-92. PubMed ID: 26481334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Technical advances of interventional fluoroscopy and flat panel image receptor.
    Lin PJ
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 18849699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Flat-panel detectors: how much better are they?
    Seibert JA
    Pediatr Radiol; 2006 Sep; 36 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):173-81. PubMed ID: 16862412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of image quality in digital chest imaging.
    De Hauwere A; Bacher K; Smeets P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):174-7. PubMed ID: 16461499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimal beam quality for chest flat panel detector system: realistic phantom study.
    Kuwahara C; Aoki T; Oda N; Kawabata J; Sugimoto K; Kobayashi M; Fujii M; Korogi Y
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Sep; 29(9):4538-4543. PubMed ID: 30737566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using a flat-panel detector in high resolution cone beam CT for dental imaging.
    Baba R; Ueda K; Okabe M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 15585803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.