These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23192107)

  • 1. Science should be ready to jump off 'the cliff'.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 2012 Nov; 491(7426):639. PubMed ID: 23192107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Budget offers recovery hope.
    Morello L; Morrison J; Reardon S; Tollefson J; Witze A
    Nature; 2014 Jan; 505(7484):461-2. PubMed ID: 24451519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Republican spending plan casts shadow on science.
    Maxmen A
    Nature; 2012 Aug; 488(7412):441. PubMed ID: 22914144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Republican win sparks fears for science funds.
    Brumfiel G
    Nature; 2002 Nov; 420(6912):113. PubMed ID: 12432355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bush's belt-tightening budget offers science slim pickings.
    Brumfiel G
    Nature; 2004 Feb; 427(6974):475. PubMed ID: 14765158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lean budget leaves scientists wanting more.
    Brumfiel G; Reichhardt T
    Nature; 2004 Nov; 432(7016):424. PubMed ID: 15565115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. US midterm elections: Deficit poses threat to science.
    Reich ES
    Nature; 2010 Oct; 467(7317):760-1. PubMed ID: 20944701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stand and deliver.
    Nature; 2010 Feb; 463(7281):587-8. PubMed ID: 20130608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cuts loom for US science.
    Semeniuk I; Thompson H
    Nature; 2012 Jul; 487(7408):414-5. PubMed ID: 22836976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Power shift stymies US science budget.
    Brumfiel G
    Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7124):130-1. PubMed ID: 17215810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Staying in the game.
    Nat Struct Mol Biol; 2006 Mar; 13(3):183. PubMed ID: 16518381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. US science agencies dodge deep cuts.
    Semeniuk I
    Nature; 2011 Nov; 479(7374):455-6. PubMed ID: 22113668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Financial planning.
    Goldston D
    Nature; 2008 Aug; 454(7205):680. PubMed ID: 18685673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Obama budget backs basic science.
    Fang J; Hand E; Monastersky R; Tollefson J; Wadman M; Waldrop M
    Nature; 2010 Feb; 463(7281):594-5. PubMed ID: 20130620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Turkish government accused of hijacking boosted science budget.
    Grüner T
    Nature; 2005 Apr; 434(7037):1055. PubMed ID: 15858537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Venezuelan government is backing science.
    Cabrera JL; Guerrero LE; Donoso A
    Nature; 2003 Feb; 421(6925):786. PubMed ID: 12594480
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Funding review sparks fears for Canadian science.
    Spurgeon D
    Nature; 2004 Dec; 432(7020):937. PubMed ID: 15616520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. More cuts loom for US science.
    Morello L
    Nature; 2013 Sep; 501(7466):147-8. PubMed ID: 24025819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Canada boosts spending on science.
    Spurgeon D
    Nature; 2003 Feb; 421(6926):880. PubMed ID: 12606963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Double trouble? To throw cash at science is a mistake.
    Sarewitz D
    Nature; 2010 Nov; 468(7321):135. PubMed ID: 21068785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.