These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23192309)

  • 1. Category inference as a function of correlational structure, category discriminability, and number of available cues.
    Lancaster ME; Shelhamer R; Homa D
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Apr; 41(3):339-53. PubMed ID: 23192309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Feature-to-Feature Inference Under Conditions of Cue Restriction and Dimensional Correlation.
    Lancaster ME; Homa D
    Am J Psychol; 2017 Spring; 130(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 29508955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Learning about the internal structure of categories through classification and feature inference.
    Jee BD; Wiley J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(9):1786-807. PubMed ID: 24320007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. More than one kind of inference: re-examining what's learned in feature inference and classification.
    Sweller N; Hayes BK
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Aug; 63(8):1568-89. PubMed ID: 20373228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Category dimensionality and feature knowledge: when more features are learned as easily as fewer.
    Hoffman AB; Murphy GL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):301-315. PubMed ID: 16569148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Classification versus inference learning contrasted with real-world categories.
    Jones EL; Ross BH
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Jul; 39(5):764-77. PubMed ID: 21264579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Why interleaving enhances inductive learning: the roles of discrimination and retrieval.
    Birnbaum MS; Kornell N; Bjork EL; Bjork RA
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Apr; 41(3):392-402. PubMed ID: 23138567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relational discovery in category learning.
    Goldwater MB; Don HJ; Krusche MJF; Livesey EJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Jan; 147(1):1-35. PubMed ID: 29309195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prior knowledge enhances the category dimensionality effect.
    Hoffman AB; Harris HD; Murphy GL
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Mar; 36(2):256-70. PubMed ID: 18426059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The indirect modification of categorical knowledge.
    Homa D; Rogers D; Lancaster ME
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Feb; 22(1):219-27. PubMed ID: 24838308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sequence as context in category learning: An eyetracking study.
    Zaki SR; Salmi IL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Nov; 45(11):1942-1954. PubMed ID: 30816766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Extracting functional equivalence from reversing contingencies.
    Liljeholm M; Balleine BW
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Apr; 36(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 20384397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of training sequence and between-category similarity on unsupervised induction.
    Clapper JP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(7):1370-90. PubMed ID: 25384115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing methods of category learning: Classification versus feature inference.
    Morgan EL; Johansen MK
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Jul; 48(5):710-730. PubMed ID: 32078736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Compliance, conversion, and category induction.
    Jaswal VK; Lima OK; Small JE
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Feb; 102(2):182-95. PubMed ID: 18556016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Learning categories composed of varying instances: the effect of classification, inference, and structural alignment.
    Yamauchi T; Markman AB
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Jan; 28(1):64-78. PubMed ID: 10714140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Better learning with more error: probabilistic feedback increases sensitivity to correlated cues in categorization.
    Little DR; Lewandowsky S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):1041-61. PubMed ID: 19586269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inference using categories.
    Yamauchi T; Markman AB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 May; 26(3):776-95. PubMed ID: 10855431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Collaboration facilitates abstract category learning.
    Richey JE; Nokes-Malach TJ; Cohen K
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Jul; 46(5):685-698. PubMed ID: 29427208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mitigating cue competition effects in human category learning.
    Lau JS; Casale MB; Pashler H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Jul; 73(7):983-1003. PubMed ID: 32160816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.