These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23192483)

  • 1. Better pregnancy monitoring using nonlinear correlation analysis of external uterine electromyography.
    Hassan M; Terrien J; Muszynski C; Alexandersson A; Marque C; Karlsson B
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 Apr; 60(4):1160-6. PubMed ID: 23192483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nonlinearity of EHG signals used to distinguish active labor from normal pregnancy contractions.
    Hassan M; Terrien J; Alexandersson A; Marque C; Karlsson B
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():2387-90. PubMed ID: 21096805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Application of wavelet transform to uterine electromyographic signals recorded using abdominal surface electrodes.
    Eswaran H; Wilson JD; Murphy P; Preissl H; Lowery CL
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2002 Mar; 11(3):158-66. PubMed ID: 12380670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Non-invasive transabdominal uterine electromyography correlates with the strength of intrauterine pressure and is predictive of labor and delivery.
    Maul H; Maner WL; Olson G; Saade GR; Garfield RE
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 May; 15(5):297-301. PubMed ID: 15280119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A nonlinear parameterization of multivariate electrohysterographical signals.
    Radomski DS
    Comput Biol Med; 2015 Dec; 67():13-20. PubMed ID: 26484592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial analysis of uterine EMG signals: evidence of increased in synchronization with term.
    Hassan M; Terrien J; Karlsson B; Marque C
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():6296-9. PubMed ID: 19963919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automated electrohysterographic detection of uterine contractions for monitoring of pregnancy: feasibility and prospects.
    Muszynski C; Happillon T; Azudin K; Tylcz JB; Istrate D; Marque C
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 May; 18(1):136. PubMed ID: 29739438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Uterine electromyography during active phase compared with latent phase of labor at term.
    Trojner Bregar A; Lucovnik M; Verdenik I; Jager F; Gersak K; Garfield RE
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Feb; 95(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 26575523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrohysterography during pregnancy: preliminary report.
    Gondry J; Marque C; Duchene J; Cabrol D
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 1993; 27(4):318-24. PubMed ID: 8369867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of obesity on preterm delivery prediction by transabdominal recording of uterine electromyography.
    Lucovnik M; Chambliss LR; Blumrick R; Balducci J; Gersak K; Garfield RE
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 55(5):692-696. PubMed ID: 27751417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Waterproofing EMG Instrumentation.
    Benfield RD; Newton ER; Hortobágyi T
    Biol Res Nurs; 2007 Jan; 8(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 17172318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance analysis of four nonlinearity analysis methods using a model with variable complexity and application to uterine EMG signals.
    Diab A; Hassan M; Marque C; Karlsson B
    Med Eng Phys; 2014 Jun; 36(6):761-7. PubMed ID: 24593872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of filtering on the classification rate of nonlinear analysis methods applied to uterine EMG signals.
    Diab A; Falou O; Hassan M; Karlsson B; Marque C
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015; 2015():4182-5. PubMed ID: 26737216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Electrohysterography. A promising alternative for monitoring contractions].
    Vlemminx MW; de Lau H; Vullings R; Peters CH; Oei SG
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2015; 159():A8535. PubMed ID: 25650036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Mechanical and electrical uterine activity. Part II. Contractions parameters].
    Zietek J; Sikora J; Horoba K; Matonia A; Jezewski J; Magnucki J; Kobielska L
    Ginekol Pol; 2008 Nov; 79(11):798-804. PubMed ID: 19140505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prediction of intrauterine pressure waveform from transabdominal electrohysterography.
    Euliano T; Skowronski M; Marossero D; Shuster J; Edwards R
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Dec; 19(12):811-6. PubMed ID: 17190691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance comparison of coupling-evaluation methods in discriminating between pregnancy and labor EHG signals.
    Diab A; Boudaoud S; Karlsson B; Marque C
    Comput Biol Med; 2021 May; 132():104308. PubMed ID: 33711558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Evolution of electrohysterogram signals synchronization according to term of pregnancy: interest for preterm labor diagnosis].
    Muszynski C; Terrien J; Dréan Y; Chkeir A; Hassan M; Marque C; Gondry J
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012 Jun; 40(6):344-9. PubMed ID: 22483715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Classification performance of the frequency-related parameters derived from uterine EMG signals.
    Moslem B; Karlsson B; Diab MO; Khalil M; Marque C
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():3371-4. PubMed ID: 22255062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison between approximate entropy, correntropy and time reversibility: application to uterine electromyogram signals.
    Hassan M; Terrien J; Marque C; Karlsson B
    Med Eng Phys; 2011 Oct; 33(8):980-6. PubMed ID: 21497127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.