These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23192483)
61. Uterine EMG analysis: a dynamic approach for change detection and classification. Khalil M; Duchêne J IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Jun; 47(6):748-56. PubMed ID: 10833849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Cross-correlation analysis of multichannel uterine EMG signals. Halabi R; Diab MO; Moslem B; Khalil M; Marque C Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():3106-9. PubMed ID: 23366582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Uterine electromyography for identification of first-stage labor arrest in term nulliparous women with spontaneous onset of labor. Vasak B; Graatsma EM; Hekman-Drost E; Eijkemans MJ; van Leeuwen JH; Visser GH; Jacod BC Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Sep; 209(3):232.e1-8. PubMed ID: 23727524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Uterine activity during the third stage of labor. Schorn MN J Midwifery Womens Health; 2012; 57(2):151-5. PubMed ID: 22432487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Electrohysterography for uterine monitoring during term labour compared to external tocodynamometry and intra-uterine pressure catheter. Vlemminx MWC; Thijssen KMJ; Bajlekov GI; Dieleman JP; Van Der Hout-Van Der Jagt MB; Oei SG Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Aug; 215():197-205. PubMed ID: 28649034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Comparing uterine electromyography activity of antepartum patients versus term labor patients. Garfield RE; Maner WL; MacKay LB; Schlembach D; Saade GR Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jul; 193(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 16021054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Correlation of external and internal monitoring of uterine activity in a cohort of term patients. Miles AM; Monga M; Richeson KS Am J Perinatol; 2001 May; 18(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 11414523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Prediction of labor using non-invasive Laplacian EHG recordings. Ye-Lin Y; Prats-Boluda G; Alberola-Rubio J; Bueno Barrachina JM; Perales A; Garcia-Casado J Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():7428-31. PubMed ID: 24111462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Measurement of Uterine and Abdominal Muscle Electromyography in Pregnant Women for Estimation of Expulsive Activities during the 2nd Stage of Labor. Qian X; Li P; Shi S; Garfield RE; Liu H Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2019; 84(6):555-561. PubMed ID: 31039575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Effect of an oxytocin receptor antagonist (atosiban) on uterine electrical activity. Hadar E; Melamed N; Aviram A; Raban O; Saltzer L; Hiersch L; Yogev Y Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Oct; 209(4):384.e1-7. PubMed ID: 23727522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. New electrohysterogram-based estimators of intrauterine pressure signal, tonus and contraction peak for non-invasive labor monitoring. Benalcazar-Parra C; Garcia-Casado J; Ye-Lin Y; Alberola-Rubio J; Lopez Á; Perales-Marin A; Prats-Boluda G Physiol Meas; 2019 Sep; 40(8):085003. PubMed ID: 31370050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Development of Electrohysterogram Recording System for Monitoring Uterine Contraction. Hao D; An Y; Qiao X; Qiu Q; Zhou X; Peng J J Healthc Eng; 2019; 2019():4230157. PubMed ID: 31354930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. [Assessment of pre-term uterine contractions by characterization of the power spectra of abdominal surface potentials (ASP)]. Ebisawa H; Matsuura M; Takagi S; Satoh K Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Oct; 44(10):1233-40. PubMed ID: 1431436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. External four-channel tocography during delivery. Spätling L; Fallenstein F; Danders R; Hasenburg A Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1994 Sep; 46(3):291-5. PubMed ID: 7805998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Accuracy of electromyometrial imaging of uterine contractions in clinical environment. Wang H; Wu W; Talcott M; McKinstry RC; Woodard PK; Macones GA; Schwartz AL; Cuculich P; Cahill AG; Wang Y Comput Biol Med; 2020 Jan; 116():103543. PubMed ID: 31786490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. [Significance of the site of uterine contraction for labor progress and duration of pregnancy]. Spätling L; Danders R; Behrens C; Hasenburg A; Fallenstein F Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1994; 198(5-6):204-6. PubMed ID: 7717009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Frequency of uterine contractions and the risk of spontaneous preterm delivery. Iams JD; Newman RB; Thom EA; Goldenberg RL; Mueller-Heubach E; Moawad A; Sibai BM; Caritis SN; Miodovnik M; Paul RH; Dombrowski MP; Thurnau G; McNellis D; N Engl J Med; 2002 Jan; 346(4):250-5. PubMed ID: 11807149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Use of uterine electromyography to diagnose term and preterm labor. Lucovnik M; Kuon RJ; Chambliss LR; Maner WL; Shi SQ; Shi L; Balducci J; Garfield RE Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2011 Feb; 90(2):150-7. PubMed ID: 21241260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Uterine activity monitoring during labor. Bakker PC; Van Rijswijk S; van Geijn HP J Perinat Med; 2007; 35(6):468-77. PubMed ID: 18052832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Evolution of phase synchronization of the two frequency components of the electrohysterogram (EHG): application to the detection of human labor. Terrien J; Hassan M; Alexandersson A; Marque C; Karlsson B Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():17-20. PubMed ID: 21096094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]