154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23193694)
1. Microscopic evaluation of polymeric film properties of anhydrous sunscreen compositions and their relation to absorption and water resistance.
Prettypaul D; Fares H
J Cosmet Sci; 2012; 63(3):213-21. PubMed ID: 23193694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Investigating Film Properties of Polymers Used in Anhydrous Sunscreen Formulations Using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM): Polymer/Polymer Interactions and Their Relation to Vapor Transmission.
Thompson W; Kennedy D; Gillece T; McMullen RL; Senak L; Fares H
J Cosmet Sci; 2018; 69(3):203-212. PubMed ID: 30052194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. New noninvasive approach assessing in vivo sun protection factor (SPF) using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) and in vitro transmission.
Ruvolo Junior E; Kollias N; Cole C
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 2014 Aug; 30(4):202-11. PubMed ID: 24417335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Resistance of liposomal sunscreen formulations against plain water as well as salt water exposure and perspiration.
Korting HC; Schöllmann C
Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2011; 24(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 20720455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of sun protection factors by calculation of transmissions with a calibrated step film model.
Herzog B
J Cosmet Sci; 2002; 53(1):11-26. PubMed ID: 11917252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How a calculated model of sunscreen film geometry can explain in vitro and in vivo SPF variation.
Ferrero L; Pissavini M; Doucet O
Photochem Photobiol Sci; 2010 Apr; 9(4):540-51. PubMed ID: 20354649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of lipid microparticle encapsulation on in vitro efficacy, photostability and water resistance of the sunscreen agents, octyl methoxycinnamate and butyl methoxydibenzoylmethane.
Trotta V; Goios F; Monteiro H; Almeida IF; Scalia S
Drug Dev Ind Pharm; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1233-9. PubMed ID: 23837520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. New in vitro SPF Evaluation Method for Hydrophilic Sunscreen Samples.
Ikawa K; Aizawa A; Banno T; Fujishiro M; Yahagi S; Kuroda A; Asakura K
J Oleo Sci; 2022 Feb; 71(2):321-331. PubMed ID: 34980740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaporation of Sunscreen Films: How the UV Protection Properties Change.
Binks BP; Brown J; Fletcher PD; Johnson AJ; Marinopoulos I; Crowther JM; Thompson MA
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2016 Jun; 8(21):13270-81. PubMed ID: 27167054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative evaluation of different substrates for the in vitro determination of sunscreen photostability: spectrophotometric and HPLC analyses.
Scalia S; Mezzena M; Bianchi A
Int J Cosmet Sci; 2010 Feb; 32(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 19732185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Method for screening sunscreen cream formulations by determination of in vitro SPF and PA values using UV transmission spectroscopy and texture profile analysis.
Khunkitti W; Satthanakul P; Waranuch N; Pitaksuteepong T; Kitikhun P
J Cosmet Sci; 2014; 65(3):147-59. PubMed ID: 25043486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development of a Synthetic Substrate for the in vitro Performance Testing of Sunscreens.
Sohn M; Malburet C; Baptiste L; Prigl Y
Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2017; 30(3):159-170. PubMed ID: 28535540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A new chemical approach to optimize the in vitro SPF method on the HD6 PMMA plate.
Marguerie S; Pissavini M; Baud A; Carayol T; Doucet O
J Cosmet Sci; 2012; 63(4):243-54. PubMed ID: 23193888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro measurements of sunscreen protection.
Stanfield J; Osterwalder U; Herzog B
Photochem Photobiol Sci; 2010 Apr; 9(4):489-94. PubMed ID: 20354642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating the Sun Protection Factor of Cosmetic Formulations Containing Afzelin.
Kim M; Shin S; Ryu D; Cho E; Yoo J; Park D; Jung E
Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo); 2021 Nov; 69(11):1039-1044. PubMed ID: 34456215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sunscreen tests: correspondence between in vitro data and values reported by the manufacturers.
Garoli D; Pelizzo MG; Bernardini B; Nicolosi P; Alaibac M
J Dermatol Sci; 2008 Dec; 52(3):193-204. PubMed ID: 18755574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Alternative evaluation method in vitro for the water-resistant effect of sunscreen products.
Ahn S; Yang H; Lee H; Moon S; Chang I
Skin Res Technol; 2008 May; 14(2):187-91. PubMed ID: 18412561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effectiveness of different substrate materials for in vitro sunscreen tests.
Garoli D; Pelizzo MG; Nicolosi P; Peserico A; Tonin E; Alaibac M
J Dermatol Sci; 2009 Nov; 56(2):89-98. PubMed ID: 19700264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of applied quantity, water-immersion and air-drying on covering and microstructure of physical sunscreen films.
Tarroux R; Assalit MF; Hemmerlé J; Ginestar J
Int J Cosmet Sci; 2000 Dec; 22(6):447-58. PubMed ID: 18503431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sun protection factors: world wide confusion.
Osterwalder U; Herzog B
Br J Dermatol; 2009 Nov; 161 Suppl 3():13-24. PubMed ID: 19775352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
