212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23195366)
1. Imaging software accuracy for 3-dimensional analysis of the upper airway.
Weissheimer A; Menezes LM; Sameshima GT; Enciso R; Pham J; Grauer D
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Dec; 142(6):801-13. PubMed ID: 23195366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measuring the airway in 3 dimensions: a reliability and accuracy study.
El H; Palomo JM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4 Suppl):S50.e1-9; discussion S50-2. PubMed ID: 20381759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing different software packages for measuring the oropharynx and minimum cross-sectional area.
ElShebiny T; Morcos S; El H; Palomo JM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Feb; 161(2):228-237.e32. PubMed ID: 34563428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computed gray levels in multislice and cone-beam computed tomography.
Azeredo F; de Menezes LM; Enciso R; Weissheimer A; de Oliveira RB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jul; 144(1):147-55. PubMed ID: 23810056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability and accuracy of three imaging software packages used for 3D analysis of the upper airway on cone beam computed tomography images.
Chen H; van Eijnatten M; Wolff J; de Lange J; van der Stelt PF; Lobbezoo F; Aarab G
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Aug; 46(6):20170043. PubMed ID: 28467118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability of a method to conduct upper airway analysis in cone-beam computed tomography.
Souza KR; Oltramari-Navarro PV; Navarro Rde L; Conti AC; Almeida MR
Braz Oral Res; 2013; 27(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 23306626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography definition of the anatomical subregions of the upper airway: a validation study.
Guijarro-Martínez R; Swennen GR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Sep; 42(9):1140-9. PubMed ID: 23623785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in predicting the diameter of unerupted teeth.
Nguyen E; Boychuk D; Orellana M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):e59-66. PubMed ID: 21803235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Volumetric reconstruction and determination of minimum crosssectional area of the pharynx in patients with cleft lip and palate: comparison between two different softwares.
Pinheiro ML; Yatabe M; Ioshida M; Orlandi L; Dumast P; Trindade-Suedam IK
J Appl Oral Sci; 2018 Oct; 26():e20170282. PubMed ID: 30304121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is the airway volume being correctly analyzed?
Alves M; Baratieri C; Mattos CT; Brunetto D; Fontes Rda C; Santos JR; Ruellas AC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 May; 141(5):657-61. PubMed ID: 22554760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative study of lateral cephalograms and cone-beam computed tomographic images in upper airway assessment.
Vizzotto MB; Liedke GS; Delamare EL; Silveira HD; Dutra V; Silveira HE
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):390-3. PubMed ID: 21398319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional tomographic assessment of the upper airway using 2 different imaging software programs: A comparison study.
Garcia-Usó M; Lima TF; Trindade IEK; Pimenta LAF; Trindade-Suedam IK
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Feb; 159(2):217-223. PubMed ID: 33483220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of airway volume changes between open and closed jaw positions.
Glupker L; Kula K; Parks E; Babler W; Stewart K; Ghoneima A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr; 147(4):426-34. PubMed ID: 25836002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of MDCT and CBCT in three-dimensional evaluation of the oropharynx morphology.
Chen H; van Eijnatten M; Aarab G; Forouzanfar T; de Lange J; van der Stelt P; Lobbezoo F; Wolff J
Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jan; 40(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 28453722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Are multi-detector computed tomography and cone-beam computed tomography exams and software accurate to measure the upper airway? A systematic review.
Templier L; Rossi C; Lagravère Vich M; Fernández Pujol R; Muwanguzi M; Gianoni-Capenakas S
Eur J Orthod; 2023 Nov; 45(6):818-831. PubMed ID: 37797294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of linear measurements on 3D surface models using CBCT data segmentation obtained by automatic standard pre-set thresholds in two segmentation software programs: an in vitro study.
Poleti ML; Fernandes TM; Pagin O; Moretti MR; Rubira-Bullen IR
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Jan; 20(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 25963719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pharyngeal airway characterization in adolescents related to facial skeletal pattern: a preliminary study.
Claudino LV; Mattos CT; Ruellas AC; Sant' Anna EF
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jun; 143(6):799-809. PubMed ID: 23726330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of the accuracy of imaging software for 3D rendering of the upper airway, usable in orthodontic and craniofacial clinical settings.
Lo Giudice A; Ronsivalle V; Gastaldi G; Leonardi R
Prog Orthod; 2022 Jun; 23(1):22. PubMed ID: 35691961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy and repeatability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements used in the determination of facial indices in the laboratory setup.
Moerenhout BA; Gelaude F; Swennen GR; Casselman JW; Van Der Sloten J; Mommaerts MY
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 18815053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and direct measurement in the examination of the mandibular canal and adjacent structures.
Kim TS; Caruso JM; Christensen H; Torabinejad M
J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1191-4. PubMed ID: 20630297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
