BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23198438)

  • 1. [Brain electrical source analysis of the response to visual target and distractor stimuli].
    Li Y; Hu Y; Ren L; Sun Z
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Oct; 29(5):933-40. PubMed ID: 23198438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attentional systems in target and distractor processing: a combined ERP and fMRI study.
    Bledowski C; Prvulovic D; Goebel R; Zanella FE; Linden DE
    Neuroimage; 2004 Jun; 22(2):530-40. PubMed ID: 15193581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Responses to rare visual target and distractor stimuli using event-related fMRI.
    Clark VP; Fannon S; Lai S; Benson R; Bauer L
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 May; 83(5):3133-9. PubMed ID: 10805707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Localizing P300 generators in visual target and distractor processing: a combined event-related potential and functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Bledowski C; Prvulovic D; Hoechstetter K; Scherg M; Wibral M; Goebel R; Linden DE
    J Neurosci; 2004 Oct; 24(42):9353-60. PubMed ID: 15496671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Difficulty of discrimination modulates attentional capture by regulating attentional focus.
    Sawaki R; Katayama J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Feb; 21(2):359-71. PubMed ID: 18510441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Localizing P300 generators in high-density event- related potential with fMRI.
    Li Y; Wang LQ; Hu Y
    Med Sci Monit; 2009 Mar; 15(3):MT47-53. PubMed ID: 19247255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Event-related potential study of novelty processing abnormalities in autism.
    Sokhadze E; Baruth J; Tasman A; Sears L; Mathai G; El-Baz A; Casanova MF
    Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2009 Mar; 34(1):37-51. PubMed ID: 19199028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A simultaneous ERP/fMRI investigation of the P300 aging effect.
    O'Connell RG; Balsters JH; Kilcullen SM; Campbell W; Bokde AW; Lai R; Upton N; Robertson IH
    Neurobiol Aging; 2012 Oct; 33(10):2448-61. PubMed ID: 22277263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The cortical generators of P3a and P3b: a LORETA study.
    Volpe U; Mucci A; Bucci P; Merlotti E; Galderisi S; Maj M
    Brain Res Bull; 2007 Jul; 73(4-6):220-30. PubMed ID: 17562387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Increased visual task difficulty enhances attentional capture by both visual and auditory distractor stimuli.
    Sugimoto F; Katayama J
    Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 1664():55-62. PubMed ID: 28377160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory P3a and P3b neural generators in schizophrenia: An adaptive sLORETA P300 localization approach.
    Bachiller A; Romero S; Molina V; Alonso JF; Mañanas MA; Poza J; Hornero R
    Schizophr Res; 2015 Dec; 169(1-3):318-325. PubMed ID: 26481687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effective connectivity in target stimulus processing: a dynamic causal modeling study of visual oddball task.
    Brázdil M; Mikl M; Marecek R; Krupa P; Rektor I
    Neuroimage; 2007 Apr; 35(2):827-35. PubMed ID: 17258910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correspondence of visual evoked potentials with FMRI signals in human visual cortex.
    Whittingstall K; Wilson D; Schmidt M; Stroink G
    Brain Topogr; 2008 Dec; 21(2):86-92. PubMed ID: 18841455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ERPs evoked by different matrix sizes: implications for a brain computer interface (BCI) system.
    Allison BZ; Pineda JA
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2003 Jun; 11(2):110-3. PubMed ID: 12899248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. P3a from visual stimuli: task difficulty effects.
    Hagen GF; Gatherwright JR; Lopez BA; Polich J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Jan; 59(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 16253363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stimulus context determines whether non-target stimuli are processed as task-relevant or distractor information.
    Sawaki R; Katayama J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Nov; 117(11):2532-9. PubMed ID: 17005448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Levels of visuo-spatial selection: an ERP study of negative priming.
    Gibbons H; Wiegleb N; Stahl J
    Brain Cogn; 2013 Nov; 83(2):203-17. PubMed ID: 24056236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Occipital-parietal interactions during shifts of exogenous visuospatial attention: trial-dependent changes of effective connectivity.
    Indovina I; Macaluso E
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Dec; 22(10):1477-86. PubMed ID: 15707797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electrophysiological evidence of semantic interference in visual search.
    Telling AL; Kumar S; Meyer AS; Humphreys GW
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Oct; 22(10):2212-25. PubMed ID: 19803680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gender-selective effects of the P300 and N400 components of the visual evoked potential.
    Steffensen SC; Ohran AJ; Shipp DN; Hales K; Stobbs SH; Fleming DE
    Vision Res; 2008 Mar; 48(7):917-25. PubMed ID: 18291436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.