BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23198905)

  • 1. The proximate memory mechanism underlying the survival-processing effect: richness of encoding or interactive imagery?
    Kroneisen M; Erdfelder E; Buchner A
    Memory; 2013; 21(4):494-502. PubMed ID: 23198905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is the survival-processing memory advantage due to richness of encoding?
    Röer JP; Bell R; Buchner A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1294-302. PubMed ID: 23244053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Working memory load eliminates the survival processing effect.
    Kroneisen M; Rummel J; Erdfelder E
    Memory; 2014; 22(1):92-102. PubMed ID: 23885926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adaptive memory: the survival scenario enhances item-specific processing relative to a moving scenario.
    Burns DJ; Hart J; Griffith SE; Burns AD
    Memory; 2013; 21(6):695-706. PubMed ID: 23259675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the plasticity of the survival processing effect.
    Kroneisen M; Erdfelder E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Nov; 37(6):1553-62. PubMed ID: 21787107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dying scenarios improve recall as much as survival scenarios.
    Burns DJ; Hart J; Kramer ME
    Memory; 2014; 22(1):51-64. PubMed ID: 23678953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of perceived threat in the survival processing memory advantage.
    Olds JM; Lanska M; Westerman DL
    Memory; 2014; 22(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 23786410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The drawing effect: Evidence for reliable and robust memory benefits in free recall.
    Wammes JD; Meade ME; Fernandes MA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(9):1752-76. PubMed ID: 26444654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Imagery and retrieval of auditory and visual information: neural correlates of successful and unsuccessful performance.
    Huijbers W; Pennartz CM; Rubin DC; Daselaar SM
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1730-40. PubMed ID: 21396384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Declarative interference affects off-line processing of motor imagery learning during both sleep and wakefulness.
    Debarnot U; Castellani E; Guillot A; Giannotti V; Dimarco M; Sebastiani L
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2012 Nov; 98(4):361-7. PubMed ID: 23103616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reduced associative memory for negative information: impact of confidence and interactive imagery during study.
    Caplan JB; Sommer T; Madan CR; Fujiwara E
    Cogn Emot; 2019 Dec; 33(8):1745-1753. PubMed ID: 30990113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How can I use it? The role of functional fixedness in the survival-processing paradigm.
    Kroneisen M; Kriechbaumer M; Kamp SM; Erdfelder E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Feb; 28(1):324-332. PubMed ID: 32935282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Episodic action memory for real objects: an ERP investigation with perform, watch, and imagine action encoding tasks versus a non-action encoding task.
    Senkfor AJ; Van Petten C; Kutas M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Apr; 14(3):402-19. PubMed ID: 11970800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Survival processing modulates the neurocognitive mechanisms of episodic encoding.
    Forester G; Kroneisen M; Erdfelder E; Kamp SM
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2020 Aug; 20(4):717-729. PubMed ID: 32430899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How can survival processing improve memory encoding?
    Luo M; Geng H
    Sci China Life Sci; 2013 Nov; 56(11):1028-37. PubMed ID: 23982863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neuronal correlates of perception, imagery, and memory for familiar tunes.
    Herholz SC; Halpern AR; Zatorre RJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Jun; 24(6):1382-97. PubMed ID: 22360595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interaction of instructions with the recall strategy actually used in a paired-associates learning task.
    Straub HR; Granaas MM
    Psychol Rep; 1992 Dec; 71(3 Pt 1):987-93. PubMed ID: 1454953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dying to remember, remembering to survive: mortality salience and survival processing.
    Burns DJ; Hart J; Kramer ME; Burns AD
    Memory; 2014; 22(1):36-50. PubMed ID: 23607295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the efficacy of two name-learning techniques: expanding rehearsal and name-face imagery.
    Neuschatz JS; Preston EL; Toglia MP; Neuschatz JS
    Am J Psychol; 2005; 118(1):79-101. PubMed ID: 15822611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The longevity of adaptive memory: evidence for mnemonic advantages of survival processing 24 and 48 hours later.
    Raymaekers LH; Otgaar H; Smeets T
    Memory; 2014; 22(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 23638617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.