These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23199647)

  • 1. Measurement of polypectomy rate by using administrative claims data with validation against the adenoma detection rate.
    Patel NC; Islam RS; Wu Q; Gurudu SR; Ramirez FC; Crowell MD; Faigel DO
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Mar; 77(3):390-4. PubMed ID: 23199647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nonneoplastic polypectomy during screening colonoscopy: the impact on polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, and overall cost.
    Atia MA; Patel NC; Ratuapli SK; Boroff ES; Crowell MD; Gurudu SR; Faigel DO; Leighton JA; Ramirez FC
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Aug; 82(2):370-375.e1. PubMed ID: 25843614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Polypectomy rate is a valid quality measure for colonoscopy: results from a national endoscopy database.
    Williams JE; Holub JL; Faigel DO
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Mar; 75(3):576-82. PubMed ID: 22341104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Polypectomy rate: a surrogate for adenoma detection rate varies by colon segment, gender, and endoscopist.
    Gohel TD; Burke CA; Lankaala P; Podugu A; Kiran RP; Thota PN; Lopez R; Sanaka MR
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Jul; 12(7):1137-42. PubMed ID: 24315881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality of colonoscopy withdrawal technique and variability in adenoma detection rates (with videos).
    Lee RH; Tang RS; Muthusamy VR; Ho SB; Shah NK; Wetzel L; Bain AS; Mackintosh EE; Paek AM; Crissien AM; Saraf LJ; Kalmaz DM; Savides TJ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Jul; 74(1):128-34. PubMed ID: 21531410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Polypectomy rate as a quality measure for colonoscopy.
    Williams JE; Le TD; Faigel DO
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Mar; 73(3):498-506. PubMed ID: 20970795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability of adenoma detection rate is based on procedural volume.
    Do A; Weinberg J; Kakkar A; Jacobson BC
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Mar; 77(3):376-80. PubMed ID: 23211748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adenoma detection rate is necessary but insufficient for distinguishing high versus low endoscopist performance.
    Wang HS; Pisegna J; Modi R; Liang LJ; Atia M; Nguyen M; Cohen H; Ohning G; van Oijen M; Spiegel BM
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jan; 77(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 23261096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High quality of screening colonoscopy in Austria is not dependent on endoscopist specialty or setting.
    Kozbial K; Reinhart K; Heinze G; Zwatz C; Bannert C; Salzl P; Waldmann E; Britto-Arias M; Ferlitsch A; Trauner M; Weiss W; Ferlitsch M
    Endoscopy; 2015 Mar; 47(3):207-16. PubMed ID: 25412094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of video recording colonoscopy on adenoma detection rates.
    Madhoun MF; Tierney WM
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 21963062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The mean number of adenomas per procedure should become the gold standard to measure the neoplasia yield of colonoscopy: a population-based cohort study.
    Denis B; Sauleau EA; Gendre I; Exbrayat C; Piette C; Dancourt V; Foll Y; Ait Hadad H; Bailly L; Perrin P
    Dig Liver Dis; 2014 Feb; 46(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 24054769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anatomic and advanced adenoma detection rates as quality metrics determined via natural language processing.
    Gawron AJ; Thompson WK; Keswani RN; Rasmussen LV; Kho AN
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2014 Dec; 109(12):1844-9. PubMed ID: 24935271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Public reporting of colonoscopy quality is associated with an increase in endoscopist adenoma detection rate.
    Abdul-Baki H; Schoen RE; Dean K; Rose S; Leffler DA; Kuganeswaran E; Morris M; Carrell D; Mehrotra A
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Oct; 82(4):676-82. PubMed ID: 26385276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A novel method with significant impact on adenoma detection: combined water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy.
    Yen AW; Leung JW; Leung FW
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):944-8. PubMed ID: 23473001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The 'ins and outs' of colonoscopy at Wits Donald Gordon Medical Centre, South Africa: A practice audit of the outpatient endoscopy unit.
    Bouter C; Barrow P; Bizos D; Bobat B; Devar J; Harran N; Joseph C; Mahomed A; Oettle J; Ramos J; Seabi M; Kgabage G; Gaylard P; Surridge D; Etheredge H; Fabian J; Lutrin D; Karlsson K
    S Afr Med J; 2020 Nov; 110(12):1186-1190. PubMed ID: 33403963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of the Adenoma Detection Rate From the Polyp Detection Rate by Using a Conversion Factor in a Predominantly Hispanic Population.
    Elhanafi S; Ortiz AM; Yarlagadda A; Tsai C; Eloliby M; Mallawaarachchi I; Dwivedi A; Zuckerman MJ; Othman MO
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2015 Aug; 49(7):589-93. PubMed ID: 26035518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Quality indicators for colonoscopy: differences in polyp detection between endoscopists at one hospital].
    van Lelyveld N; van Oijen MG; Schwartz MP
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2012; 156(24):A4219. PubMed ID: 22742441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. "Running late" and adenoma detection - is there an association?
    Condiotte AM; Robertson DJ; Blodgett C; MacKenzie TA; Pohl H
    Endoscopy; 2015 Mar; 47(3):232-7. PubMed ID: 25412091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Volume and accreditation, but not specialty, affect quality standards in colonoscopy.
    Bhangu A; Bowley DM; Horner R; Baranowski E; Raman S; Karandikar S
    Br J Surg; 2012 Oct; 99(10):1436-44. PubMed ID: 22961527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The proximal serrated polyp detection rate is an easy-to-measure proxy for the detection rate of clinically relevant serrated polyps.
    IJspeert JE; van Doorn SC; van der Brug YM; Bastiaansen BA; Fockens P; Dekker E
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Nov; 82(5):870-7. PubMed ID: 25935704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.