These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
402 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23200322)
1. Maxillary stability after Le Fort I osteotomy with self-setting α-tricalcium phosphate and an absorbable plate. Ueki K; Okabe K; Marukawa K; Mukozawa A; Moroi A; Miyazaki M; Sotobori M; Ishihara Y; Yoshizawa K; Ooi K; Kawashiri S Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 May; 42(5):597-603. PubMed ID: 23200322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Maxillary stability after Le Fort I osteotomy using three different plate systems. Ueki K; Okabe K; Moroi A; Marukawa K; Sotobori M; Ishihara Y; Nakagawa K Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Aug; 41(8):942-8. PubMed ID: 22537517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of bone healing and hypoesthesia in the upper lip after Le Fort I osteotomy with self-setting α-tricalcium phosphate and absorbable plates. Ueki K; Okabe K; Marukawa K; Mukozawa A; Moroi A; Miyazaki M; Sotobori M; Ishihara Y; Yoshizawa K; Ooi K; Kawashiri S J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 41(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 22819299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Skeletal stability after mandibular setback surgery: comparisons among unsintered hydroxyapatite/poly-L-lactic acid plate, poly-L-lactic acid plate, and titanium plate. Ueki K; Okabe K; Miyazaki M; Mukozawa A; Moroi A; Marukawa K; Nakagawa K; Yamamoto E J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 May; 69(5):1464-8. PubMed ID: 21216071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Maxillary stability following Le Fort I osteotomy in combination with sagittal split ramus osteotomy and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy: a comparative study between titanium miniplate and poly-L-lactic acid plate. Ueki K; Marukawa K; Shimada M; Nakagawa K; Alam S; Yamamoto E J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 64(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 16360860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Skeletal stability after mandibular setback surgery: comparison between the hybrid technique for fixation and the conventional plate fixation using an absorbable plate and screws. Ueki K; Okabe K; Marukawa K; Mukozawa A; Moroi A; Miyazaki M; Sotobori M; Ishihara Y; Yoshizawa K; Ooi K J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 42(4):351-5. PubMed ID: 23838410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stability of maxillary advancement using rigid fixation and porous-block hydroxyapatite grafting: cleft palate versus non-cleft patients. Mehra P; Wolford LM; Hopkin JK; Castro V; Frietas R Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 12387610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of self-setting α-tricalcium phosphate between segments for bone healing and hypoaesthesia in lower lip after sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Ueki K; Okabe K; Marukawa K; Mukozawa A; Moroi A; Miyazaki M; Nakagawa K; Yamamoto E J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Jun; 40(4):e119-24. PubMed ID: 21843948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures. Costa F; Robiony M; Sembronio S; Polini F; Politi M Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(3):179-92. PubMed ID: 12387609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism. Paeng JY; Hong J; Kim CS; Kim MJ J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22209495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of bone formation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy using different fixation materials. Ueki K; Ishihara Y; Yoshizawa K; Moroi A; Ikawa H; Iguchi R; Kosaka A; Hotta A; Tsutsui T; Saida Y J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 43(5):710-6. PubMed ID: 25887426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Postoperative stability following maxillary downward movement with Le Fort I inclined osteotomy at the lateral nasal cavity wall. Yang HJ; Hwang SJ J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):793-8. PubMed ID: 22429608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Changes in the computed tomography (pixel) value of mandibular ramus bone and fixation screws after sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Ueki K; Moroi A; Iguchi R; Kosaka A; Ikawa H; Yoshizawa K Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Nov; 44(11):1337-45. PubMed ID: 26139563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Skeletal stability and morbidity with self-reinforced P (L/DL) LA resorbable osteosynthesis in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. Moure C; Qassemyar Q; Dunaud O; Neiva C; Testelin S; Devauchelle B J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 40(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 21514172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bimaxillary surgery in Class III malocclusion: soft and hard tissue changes. Aydil B; Özer N; Marşan G J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Apr; 41(3):254-7. PubMed ID: 23182267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The stability of bilateral sagittal ramus osteotomy and vertical ramus osteotomy after bimaxillary correction of class III malocclusion. Abeltins A; Jakobsone G; Urtane I; Bigestans A J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 39(8):583-7. PubMed ID: 21334219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of titanium and resorbable copolymer fixation after Le Fort I maxillary impaction. Dhol WS; Reyneke JP; Tompson B; Sándor GK Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 18617105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fixation of bimaxillary osteotomies with resorbable plates and screws: experience in 20 consecutive cases. Edwards RC; Kiely KD; Eppley BL J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Mar; 59(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 11243608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of post-surgical relapse in maxillary surgery using resorbable plate. Choi JY; Kim JW; Yoo CK; Yun PY; Baek SH; Kim YK J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 39(8):578-82. PubMed ID: 21300552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]