These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Blogs and Twitter in medical publications: too unreliable to quote, or a change waiting to happen? Chatterjee P; Biswas T S Afr Med J; 2011 Sep; 101(10):712, 714. PubMed ID: 22272866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [New section for presentation of video contributions]. Holz FG Ophthalmologe; 2014 Sep; 111(9):816. PubMed ID: 25204525 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2013: report from a New Vista. Lanier WL Mayo Clin Proc; 2013 Jan; 88(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 23274015 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Journals submit to scrutiny of their peer-review process. Giles J Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7074):252. PubMed ID: 16421533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Future evolution of traditional journals and social media medical education. Weingart SD; Faust JS Emerg Med Australas; 2014 Feb; 26(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 24495063 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Publishing in peer-reviewed journals. Fundamentals for new investigators. Tipton CM Physiologist; 1991 Oct; 34(5):275, 278-9. PubMed ID: 1788353 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: relevance for research in clinical neuropsychology. Cicchetti DV; Rourke BP; Wass P J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1992 Nov; 14(6):976-80. PubMed ID: 1452641 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Let's go to the video. Lubowitz JH; Poehling GG Arthroscopy; 2009 Jul; 25(7):705-6. PubMed ID: 19560632 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Peer review and the fate of manuscripts. Frey JJ Fam Med; 1985; 17(1):3. PubMed ID: 3843084 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Professional media as opposed to social media. Perel ML Implant Dent; 2012 Dec; 21(6):441. PubMed ID: 23135146 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]