These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Contour interaction for foveal acuity targets at different luminances. Bedell HE; Siderov J; Waugh SJ; Zemanová R; Pluháček F; Musilová L Vision Res; 2013 Aug; 89():90-5. PubMed ID: 23880125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contrast Energy and Contour Interaction. Bedell HE; Siderov J; Pluháček F Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Dec; 96(12):940-947. PubMed ID: 31834154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Foveal visual acuity is worse and shows stronger contour interaction effects for contrast-modulated than luminance-modulated Cs. Hairol MI; Formankiewicz MA; Waugh SJ Vis Neurosci; 2013 May; 30(3):105-20. PubMed ID: 23731769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Comparison of Foveal and Peripheral Contour Interaction and Crowding. Marten-Ellis SM; Bedell HE Optom Vis Sci; 2021 Jan; 98(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 33394930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Grouping Effects on Foveal Spatial Interactions in Children. Waugh SJ; Formankiewicz MA Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2020 May; 61(5):23. PubMed ID: 32413126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Upturn of the contour-interaction function at small flanking bar-to-target separations. Siderov J; Pluháček F; Bedell HE Vision Res; 2020 Feb; 167():1-7. PubMed ID: 31877370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Foveal crowding differs in children and adults. Norgett Y; Siderov J J Vis; 2014 Oct; 14(12):. PubMed ID: 25342540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Technical Report: The Mechanism of Contour Interaction Differs in the Fovea and Periphery. Pluháček F; Bedell HE; Siderov J; Kratkoczká D Optom Vis Sci; 2020 Dec; 97(12):1053-1060. PubMed ID: 33252543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perceptual learning improves contrast sensitivity, visual acuity, and foveal crowding in amblyopia. Barollo M; Contemori G; Battaglini L; Pavan A; Casco C Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2017; 35(5):483-496. PubMed ID: 28800339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Foveal contour interaction: detection and discrimination. Ehrt O; Hess RF J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2005 Feb; 22(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 15717549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Foveal contrast thresholds exhibit spatial-frequency- and polarity-specific contour interactions. Ehrt O; Hess RE; Williams CB; Sher K J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2003 Jan; 20(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 12542313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contour interaction for high and low contrast optotypes in normal and amblyopic observers. Simmers AJ; Gray LS; McGraw PV; Winn B Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1999 May; 19(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 10627844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The foveal 'crowding' effect: physics or physiology? Hess RF; Dakin SC; Kapoor N Vision Res; 2000; 40(4):365-70. PubMed ID: 10820616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of retinal image motion on visual acuity and contour interaction in congenital nystagmus. Chung ST; Bedell HE Vision Res; 1995 Nov; 35(21):3071-82. PubMed ID: 8533343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Crowding between first- and second-order letter stimuli in normal foveal and peripheral vision. Chung ST; Li RW; Levi DM J Vis; 2007 Mar; 7(2):10.1-13. PubMed ID: 18217825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evidence for an eye-movement contribution to normal foveal crowding. Bedell HE; Siderov J; Formankiewicz MA; Waugh SJ; Aydin S Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Feb; 92(2):237-45. PubMed ID: 25951481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contour interaction in fovea and periphery. Hess RF; Dakin SC; Kapoor N; Tewfik M J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2000 Sep; 17(9):1516-24. PubMed ID: 10975361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors affecting crowded acuity: eccentricity and contrast. Coates DR; Chin JM; Chung ST Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Jul; 90(7):628-38. PubMed ID: 23770657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]