BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23202156)

  • 21. A Prospective Randomized Crossover Study in Single Sided Deafness on the New Non-Invasive Adhesive Bone Conduction Hearing System.
    Mertens G; Gilles A; Bouzegta R; Van de Heyning P
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Sep; 39(8):940-949. PubMed ID: 30020266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Efficacy and safety of an in-the-mouth bone conduction device for single-sided deafness.
    Murray M; Popelka GR; Miller R
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Apr; 32(3):437-43. PubMed ID: 21221045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Management of single-sided deafness with the bone-anchored hearing aid.
    Yuen HW; Bodmer D; Smilsky K; Nedzelski JM; Chen JM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Jul; 141(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 19559952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Analysis of factors predicting the success of the bone conduction device headband trial in patients with single-sided deafness.
    Faber HT; Kievit H; de Wolf MJ; Cremers CW; Snik AF; Hol MK
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Dec; 138(12):1129-35. PubMed ID: 23247232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cochlear implant in patients with single sided deafness: hearing results and communicative benefits.
    García JM; Urquijo DP; Puerta M; Mosquera CA; Hernández LM; Aparicio ML; Barón C; Otoya Tono AM; Peñaranda A
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 May; 21(3):136-144. PubMed ID: 31741427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical need for a Baha trial in patients with single-sided sensorineural deafness. Analysis of a Baha database of 196 patients.
    Desmet J; Bouzegta R; Hofkens A; De Backer A; Lambrechts P; Wouters K; Claes J; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Mar; 269(3):799-805. PubMed ID: 21833562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Long-term subjective benefit with a bone conduction implant sound processor in 44 patients with single-sided deafness.
    Desmet J; Wouters K; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Jul; 35(6):1017-25. PubMed ID: 24751733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A Randomized Crossover Study in Single-Sided Deafness Comparing a Cartilage Conduction CROS System and an Air-Conduction CROS System.
    Takaki K; Kashio A; Nozaki E; Kanai T; Kamogashira T; Saze F; Uranaka T; Urata S; Koyama H; Kawahara Y; Yamasoba T
    Otol Neurotol; 2024 Jul; 45(6):635-642. PubMed ID: 38769110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Preliminary comparison of bone-anchored hearing instruments and a dental device as treatments for unilateral hearing loss.
    Moore BC; Popelka GR
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Oct; 52(10):678-86. PubMed ID: 23859058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparisons of sound processors based on osseointegrated implants in patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss.
    Pfiffner F; Caversaccio MD; Kompis M
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jul; 32(5):728-35. PubMed ID: 21646934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Audiological Results and Quality of Life of Sophono Alpha 2 Transcutaneous Bone-Anchored Implant Users in Single-Sided Deafness.
    Bernardeschi D; Russo FY; Nguyen Y; Vicault E; Flament J; Bernou D; Sterkers O; Mosnier I
    Audiol Neurootol; 2016; 21(3):158-64. PubMed ID: 27159973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bone-anchored Hearing Aids: correlation between pure-tone thresholds and outcome in three user groups.
    Pfiffner F; Kompis M; Stieger C
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):884-90. PubMed ID: 19730146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Efficacy of Bone-Anchored Hearing Aids in Single-Sided Deafness: A Systematic Review.
    Kim G; Ju HM; Lee SH; Kim HS; Kwon JA; Seo YJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Apr; 38(4):473-483. PubMed ID: 28196001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Improvement of speech perception in quiet and in noise without decreasing localization abilities with the bone conduction device Bonebridge.
    Weiss R; Leinung M; Baumann U; Weißgerber T; Rader T; Stöver T
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 May; 274(5):2107-2115. PubMed ID: 28032241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Audiological and subjective benefit results in bone-anchored hearing device users.
    Boleas-Aguirre MS; Bulnes Plano MD; de Erenchun Lasa IR; Ibáñez Beroiz B
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):494-503. PubMed ID: 22472615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. BAHA in single-sided deafness: patient compliance and subjective benefit.
    Schrøder SA; Ravn T; Bonding P
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Apr; 31(3):404-8. PubMed ID: 20357630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Long-term results with the titanium bone-anchored hearing aid: the U.S. experience.
    Wazen JJ; Caruso M; Tjellstrom A
    Am J Otol; 1998 Nov; 19(6):737-41. PubMed ID: 9831146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Review: Bone conduction devices and contralateral routing of sound systems in single-sided deafness.
    Peters JP; Smit AL; Stegeman I; Grolman W
    Laryngoscope; 2015 Jan; 125(1):218-26. PubMed ID: 25124297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Functional Results and Subjective Benefit of a Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Device in Patients With Single-Sided Deafness.
    Laske RD; Röösli C; Pfiffner F; Veraguth D; Huber AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Aug; 36(7):1151-6. PubMed ID: 26111077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Preliminary functional results and quality of life after implantation of a new bone conduction hearing device in patients with conductive and mixed hearing loss.
    Ihler F; Volbers L; Blum J; Matthias C; Canis M
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Feb; 35(2):211-5. PubMed ID: 24448279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.