These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23202557)

  • 1. Experimental and numerical investigation of interactions between above and below ground drainage systems.
    Djordjević S; Saul AJ; Tabor GR; Blanksby J; Galambos I; Sabtu N; Sailor G
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 67(3):535-42. PubMed ID: 23202557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characterization of the hydraulic performance of a gully under drainage conditions.
    Martins R; Leandro J; de Carvalho RF
    Water Sci Technol; 2014; 69(12):2423-30. PubMed ID: 24960003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Energy losses at three-way circular drop manholes under surcharged conditions.
    Arao S; Kusuda T; Moriyama K; Hiratsuka S; Asada J; Hirose N
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 22678199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensitivity analysis of surface runoff generation in urban flood forecasting.
    Simões NE; Leitão JP; Maksimović C; Sá Marques A; Pina R
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(10):2595-601. PubMed ID: 20453333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determining the spill flow discharge of combined sewer overflows using rating curves based on computational fluid dynamics instead of the standard weir equation.
    Fach S; Sitzenfrei R; Rauch W
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(12):3035-43. PubMed ID: 19955626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Numerical and experimental study of the fundamental flow characteristics of a 3D gully box under drainage.
    Lopes P; Carvalho RF; Leandro J
    Water Sci Technol; 2017 May; 75(9-10):2204-2215. PubMed ID: 28498133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of urban flooding by dual drainage simulation model RisUrSim.
    Schmitt TG; Thomas M; Ettrich N
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(5):257-64. PubMed ID: 16248203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative study of manhole hydraulics using stereoscopic PIV and different RANS models.
    Beg MNA; Carvalho RF; Tait S; Brevis W; Rubinato M; Schellart A; Leandro J
    Water Sci Technol; 2017 Apr; 2017(1):87-98. PubMed ID: 29698224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of Doppler flow meter position on discharge measurement in surcharged manholes.
    Yang H; Zhu DZ; Liu Y
    Water Sci Technol; 2018 Feb; 77(3-4):647-654. PubMed ID: 29431709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The prediction of solute transport in surcharged manholes using CFD.
    Lau SD; Stovin VR; Guymer I
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 55(4):57-64. PubMed ID: 17425072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of inlet efficiency through a 3D simulation: numerical and experimental comparison.
    Gómez M; Recasens J; Russo B; Martínez-Gomariz E
    Water Sci Technol; 2016 Oct; 74(8):1926-1935. PubMed ID: 27789893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of settling velocity formulation in the determination of gully pot trapping efficiency: comparison between analytical and experimental data.
    Ciccarello A; Bolognesi A; Maglionico M; Artina S
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 22173403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Real-time forecasting urban drainage models: full or simplified networks?
    Leitão JP; Simões NE; Maksimović C; Ferreira F; Prodanović D; Matos JS; Sá Marques A
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(9):2106-14. PubMed ID: 21045338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The management of urban surface water flood risks: SUDS performance in flood reduction from extreme events.
    Viavattene C; Ellis JB
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 67(1):99-108. PubMed ID: 23128626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison between InfoWorks hydraulic results and a physical model of an urban drainage system.
    Rubinato M; Shucksmith J; Saul AJ; Shepherd W
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 68(2):372-9. PubMed ID: 23863430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Numerical and experimental flow analysis of the Wang-Zwische double-lumen cannula.
    De Bartolo C; Nigro A; Fragomeni G; Colacino FM; Wang D; Jones CC; Zwischenberger J
    ASAIO J; 2011; 57(4):318-27. PubMed ID: 21654494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Design of self-cleansing sanitary sewer systems with the use of flushing devices.
    Goormans T; Engelen D; Bouteligier R; Willems P; Berlamont J
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(4):901-8. PubMed ID: 19700828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimise inlet condition and design parameters of a new sewer overflow screening device using numerical model.
    Aziz MA; Imteaz MA; Huda N; Naser J
    Water Sci Technol; 2014; 70(11):1880-7. PubMed ID: 25500477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of hydraulic efficiency of disinfection systems based on residence time distribution curves.
    Wilson JM; Venayagamoorthy SK
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Dec; 44(24):9377-82. PubMed ID: 21090605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Viscous flow simulation in a stenosis model using discrete particle dynamics: a comparison between DPD and CFD.
    Feng R; Xenos M; Girdhar G; Kang W; Davenport JW; Deng Y; Bluestein D
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2012 Jan; 11(1-2):119-29. PubMed ID: 21369918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.