167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23202862)
1. [CT rhinometry : a correlation of rhinomanometry and multiplanar computer tomography of the nasal cavity].
Eichhorn KW; Schneider B; Bley TA; Wagner I; Schröck A; Jakob M
HNO; 2012 Dec; 60(12):1067-74. PubMed ID: 23202862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Objective measurement of nasal airway dimensions using acoustic rhinometry: methodological and clinical aspects.
Hilberg O
Allergy; 2002; 57 Suppl 70():5-39. PubMed ID: 11990714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 4-Phase-Rhinomanometry (4PR)--basics and practice 2010.
Vogt K; Jalowayski AA; Althaus W; Cao C; Han D; Hasse W; Hoffrichter H; Mösges R; Pallanch J; Shah-Hosseini K; Peksis K; Wernecke KD; Zhang L; Zaporoshenko P
Rhinol Suppl; 2010; 21():1-50. PubMed ID: 20649107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Consensus report on acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry.
Clement PA; Gordts F;
Rhinology; 2005 Sep; 43(3):169-79. PubMed ID: 16218509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of rhinomanometry in common rhinologic disorders.
Demirbas D; Cingi C; Cakli H; Kaya E
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2011 Nov; 8(6):769-77. PubMed ID: 22029472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Usage of four-phase high-resolution rhinomanometry and measurement of nasal resistance in sleep-disordered breathing.
Toh ST; Lin CH; Guilleminault C
Laryngoscope; 2012 Oct; 122(10):2343-9. PubMed ID: 22777838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Responsiveness of acoustic rhinometry to septorhinoplasty by comparison with rhinomanometry and subjective instruments.
Ansari E; Rogister F; Lefebvre P; Tombu S; Poirrier AL
Clin Otolaryngol; 2019 Sep; 44(5):778-783. PubMed ID: 31220404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of a cadaveric model for comprehensive physiologic and anatomic evaluation of rhinoplastic techniques.
Coan BS; Neff E; Mukundan S; Marcus JR
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2009 Dec; 124(6):2107-2117. PubMed ID: 19952668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation between subjective and objective nasal breathing assessments in examinees with nasal septum deformities.
Savović S; Smajić M; Molnar S; Jovancević L; Buljcik-Cupić M; Kljajić V; Pilija V
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2013 Apr; 70(4):380-5. PubMed ID: 23700942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The new agreement of the international RIGA consensus conference on nasal airway function tests.
Vogt K; Bachmann-Harildstad G; Lintermann A; Nechyporenko A; Peters F; Wernecke KD
Rhinology; 2018 Jun; 56(2):133-143. PubMed ID: 29353289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can objective measurements of the nasal form and function represent the clinical picture in unilateral cleft lip and palate?
Peroz R; Holmström M; Mani M
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 May; 70(5):653-658. PubMed ID: 28325563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of optical rhinometry and active anterior rhinomanometry using nasal provocation testing.
Wüstenberg EG; Zahnert T; Hüttenbrink KB; Hummel T
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Apr; 133(4):344-9. PubMed ID: 17438248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Acoustic rhinometry in humans: accuracy of nasal passage area estimates, and ability to quantify paranasal sinus volume and ostium size.
Tarhan E; Coskun M; Cakmak O; Celik H; Cankurtaran M
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2005 Aug; 99(2):616-23. PubMed ID: 15802371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Importance of active anterior rhinomanometry].
Belić B; Andrić V
Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2002; 130 Suppl 1():33-6. PubMed ID: 12395461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of rhinomanometric and computational fluid dynamic assessment of nasal resistance with respect to measurement accuracy.
Schmidt N; Behrbohm H; Goubergrits L; Hildebrandt T; Brüning J
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2022 Sep; 17(9):1519-1529. PubMed ID: 35821562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Research Active Posterior Rhinomanometry Tomography Method for Nasal Breathing Determining Violations.
Avrunin OG; Nosova YV; Abdelhamid IY; Pavlov SV; Shushliapina NO; Bouhlal NA; Ormanbekova A; Iskakova A; Harasim D
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Dec; 21(24):. PubMed ID: 34960601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of perceptional nasal obstruction with rhinomanometric and acoustic rhinometric assessment.
Naito K; Miyata S; Saito S; Sakurai K; Takeuchi K
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2001 Dec; 258(10):505-8. PubMed ID: 11829185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation between acoustic rhinometry, computed rhinomanometry and cone-beam computed tomography in mouth breathers with transverse maxillary deficiency.
Sakai RHUS; Marson FAL; Sakuma ETI; Ribeiro JD; Sakano E
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Nov; 84(1):40-50. PubMed ID: 28017262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical parameters influencing the results of anterior rhinomanometry in children.
Welkoborsky HJ; Rose-Diekmann C; Vor der Holte AP; Ott H
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Aug; 279(8):3963-3972. PubMed ID: 35041066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Diseases of the nose and paranasal sinuses in childhood].
Stenner M; Rudack C
Laryngorhinootologie; 2014 Mar; 93 Suppl 1():S24-48. PubMed ID: 24710785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
