136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23203862)
1. Non-inferiority and superiority tests for partially matched data when a constraint is placed on the number of new tests.
van de Ven PM; Berkhof J
Stat Med; 2013 Jul; 32(15):2515-28. PubMed ID: 23203862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Best combination of multiple diagnostic tests for screening purposes.
Qin J; Zhang B
Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(28):2905-19. PubMed ID: 20862668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bayesian estimation for performance measures of two diagnostic tests in the presence of verification bias.
Aragon DC; Martinez EZ; Achcar JA
J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Jul; 20(4):821-34. PubMed ID: 20496208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A novel design for estimating relative accuracy of screening tests when complete disease verification is not feasible.
Alonzo TA; Kittelson JM
Biometrics; 2006 Jun; 62(2):605-12. PubMed ID: 16918926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Appropriate statistical methods are required to assess diagnostic tests for replacement, add-on, and triage.
Hayen A; Macaskill P; Irwig L; Bossuyt P
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Aug; 63(8):883-91. PubMed ID: 20079607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of weighted kappa coefficients of multiple binary diagnostic tests done on the same subjects.
Roldán Nofuentes JA; Luna del Castillo JD
Stat Med; 2010 Sep; 29(20):2149-65. PubMed ID: 20809538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating accuracy of diagnostic tests with intermediate results in the absence of a gold standard.
Xu H; Black MA; Craig BA
Stat Med; 2013 Jul; 32(15):2571-84. PubMed ID: 23212851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using extended Rasch models to assess validity of diagnostic tests in the presence of a reference standard.
Viallon V; Ecosse E; Mesbah M; Pouchot J; Coste J
J Appl Meas; 2012; 13(4):376-93. PubMed ID: 23270981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sample size calculations for evaluating a diagnostic test when the gold standard is missing at random.
Kosinski AS; Chen Y; Lyles RH
Stat Med; 2010 Jul; 29(15):1572-9. PubMed ID: 20552570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Verification bias-corrected estimators of the relative true and false positive rates of two binary screening tests.
Alonzo TA
Stat Med; 2005 Feb; 24(3):403-17. PubMed ID: 15543634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Re: Insights into latent class analysis of diagnostic test performance.
Formann AK; Böhning D
Biostatistics; 2008 Oct; 9(4):777-8. PubMed ID: 18718923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Testing non-inferiority (and equivalence) between two diagnostic procedures in paired-sample ordinal data.
Lui KJ; Zhou XH
Stat Med; 2004 Feb; 23(4):545-59. PubMed ID: 14755388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing the gain in diagnostic performance when combining two diagnostic tests.
Macaskill P; Walter SD; Irwig L; Franco EL
Stat Med; 2002 Sep; 21(17):2527-46. PubMed ID: 12205697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimating the agreement and diagnostic accuracy of two diagnostic tests when one test is conducted on only a subsample of specimens.
Katki HA; Li Y; Edelstein DW; Castle PE
Stat Med; 2012 Feb; 31(5):436-48. PubMed ID: 22139832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A non-inferiority test for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired partial areas under ROC curves.
Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1762-76. PubMed ID: 17968858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing two diagnostic tests against the same "gold standard" in the same sample.
Bloch DA
Biometrics; 1997 Mar; 53(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 9147604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. On the non-inferiority of a diagnostic test based on paired observations.
Lu Y; Jin H; Genant HK
Stat Med; 2003 Oct; 22(19):3029-44. PubMed ID: 12973785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic characteristics of tests: sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios.
Carneiro AV
Rev Port Cardiol; 2011 May; 30(5):551-8. PubMed ID: 21800483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Bayesian approach to simultaneously adjusting for verification and reference standard bias in diagnostic test studies.
Lu Y; Dendukuri N; Schiller I; Joseph L
Stat Med; 2010 Oct; 29(24):2532-43. PubMed ID: 20799249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An improved test of latent-variable model misspecification in structural measurement error models for group testing data.
Huang X
Stat Med; 2009 Nov; 28(26):3316-27. PubMed ID: 19691036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
