These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23204094)

  • 1. An evaluation of eight elastomeric occlusal registration materials.
    Megremis S; Tiba A; Vogt K
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Dec; 143(12):1358-60. PubMed ID: 23204094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An evaluation of selected vinyl polysiloxane and vinyl polysiloxane-hybrid elastomeric impression materials.
    Megremis S; Tiba A; Vogt K; Geary R; Kuehne J
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Apr; 143(4):405-6. PubMed ID: 22467705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impression techniques: clinical properties that matter.
    Nash RW
    Dent Today; 2014 Apr; 33(4):110, 112-3. PubMed ID: 24791295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the precision of three implant transfer impression techniques using two elastomeric impression materials.
    Mostafa TM; Elgendy MN; Kashef NA; Halim MM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(6):525-8. PubMed ID: 21209987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tear strength of five elastomeric impression materials at two setting times and two tearing rates.
    Lawson NC; Burgess JO; Litaker M
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008; 20(3):186-93. PubMed ID: 18533981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of three implant impression techniques with different impression materials and stones.
    Chang WG; Vahidi F; Bae KH; Lim BS
    Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 22259795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mastering the impression technique for simple to complex treatments.
    Paquette JM; Sheets CG
    Dent Today; 2000 Jun; 19(6):68-75. PubMed ID: 12524795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of the accuracy of polyether, polyvinyl siloxane, and plaster impressions for long-span implant-supported prostheses.
    Hoods-Moonsammy VJ; Owen P; Howes DG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 25191885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Alginate substitutes: rationale for their.
    Boksman L; Tousignant G
    Dent Today; 2009 Apr; 28(4):104-5. PubMed ID: 19408590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dental impression materials.
    Perry R
    J Vet Dent; 2013; 30(2):116-24. PubMed ID: 24006720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impression materials--are there any really new ones?
    Miller MB
    Gen Dent; 2010; 58(2):94-6. PubMed ID: 20236915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detail reproduction, contact angles, and die hardness of elastomeric impression and gypsum die material combinations.
    Ragain JC; Grosko ML; Raj M; Ryan TN; Johnston WM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 11203635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
    Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surface roughness of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials following chemical disinfection, autoclave and microwave sterilization.
    Al Kheraif AA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May; 14(3):483-7. PubMed ID: 24171994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of various interim fixed prosthodontic materials on the polymerization of elastomeric impression materials.
    Al-Sowygh ZH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 24559525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hydrophilicity of unset and set elastomeric impression materials.
    Rupp F; Geis-Gerstorfer J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(6):552-4. PubMed ID: 21209992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the occlusal contact of crowns fabricated with the bite impression method.
    Makino S; Okada D; Shin C; Ogura R; Ikeda M; Miura H
    J Med Dent Sci; 2013 Sep; 60(3):73-81. PubMed ID: 24146169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of the Association Between the Tray and Impression Techniques on Angulated Implants Using the All-on-Four System.
    de Avila ED; Castanharo SM; Casalle N; Vasconcelos JA; de Assis Mollo F
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jul; 41 Spec No():382-5. PubMed ID: 24641165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Compression resistance of four interocclusal recording materials.
    Breeding LC; Dixon DL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Dec; 68(6):876-8. PubMed ID: 1494111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surface porosity of stone casts resulting from immersion of addition silicone rubber impressions in disinfectant solutions.
    Hiraguchi H; Kaketani M; Hirose H; Kikuchi H; Yoneyama T
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(6):567-9. PubMed ID: 25390872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.