These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23204320)

  • 1. Lifetime QALY prioritarianism in priority setting.
    Ottersen T
    J Med Ethics; 2013 Mar; 39(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 23204320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lifetime QALY prioritarianism in priority setting: quantification of the inherent trade-off.
    Ottersen T; Mæstad O; Norheim OF
    Cost Eff Resour Alloc; 2014 Jan; 12(1):2. PubMed ID: 24418267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Against lifetime QALY prioritarianism.
    Herlitz A
    J Med Ethics; 2018 Feb; 44(2):109-113. PubMed ID: 28993423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Concerns for the worse off: fair innings versus severity.
    Nord E
    Soc Sci Med; 2005 Jan; 60(2):257-63. PubMed ID: 15522483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Societal preferences for distributive justice in the allocation of health care resources: a latent class discrete choice experiment.
    Skedgel C; Wailoo A; Akehurst R
    Med Decis Making; 2015 Jan; 35(1):94-105. PubMed ID: 25145575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Equity weights in the allocation of health care: the rank-dependent QALY model.
    Bleichrodt H; Diecidue E; Quiggin J
    J Health Econ; 2004 Jan; 23(1):157-71. PubMed ID: 15154692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A note on Brock: prioritarianism, egalitarianism and the distribution of life years.
    Norheim OF
    J Med Ethics; 2009 Sep; 35(9):565-9. PubMed ID: 19717696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Priority to the young or to those with least lifetime health?
    Norheim OF
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Apr; 10(4):60-1. PubMed ID: 20379928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The second phase of priority setting. Goodbye to the simple solutions: the second phase of priority setting in health care.
    Holm S
    BMJ; 1998 Oct; 317(7164):1000-2. PubMed ID: 9841021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [What is meant by "severity of illness"?].
    Olsen JA
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2013 Jan; 133(1):64-7. PubMed ID: 23306998
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Balancing principles, QALYs, and the straw men of resource allocation.
    McMillan J; Hope T
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Apr; 10(4):48-50. PubMed ID: 20379922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new proposal for priority setting in Norway: Open and fair.
    Ottersen T; Førde R; Kakad M; Kjellevold A; Melberg HO; Moen A; Ringard Å; Norheim OF
    Health Policy; 2016 Mar; 120(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 26851991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pandemic prioritarianism.
    Nielsen L
    J Med Ethics; 2022 Apr; 48(4):236-239. PubMed ID: 33542106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Longevity bias in cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Liu L; Rettenmaier AJ; Saving TR
    Health Econ; 2008 Apr; 17(4):523-34. PubMed ID: 17990284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Balancing relevant criteria in allocating scarce life-saving interventions.
    Nord E
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Apr; 10(4):56-8. PubMed ID: 20379926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can the "quality of life" be used as a criterion in health care services?
    Aksoy S
    Bull Med Ethics; 2000 Oct; (162):19-22. PubMed ID: 11764808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rationing and life-saving treatments: should identifiable patients have higher priority?
    Hope T
    J Med Ethics; 2001 Jun; 27(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 11417026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A "fair innings" between the sexes: are men being treated inequitably?
    Tsuchiya A; Williams A
    Soc Sci Med; 2005 Jan; 60(2):277-86. PubMed ID: 15522485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Equity, capabilities and health.
    Anand P; Dolan P
    Soc Sci Med; 2005 Jan; 60(2):219-22. PubMed ID: 15522479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is the QALY blind, deaf and dumb to equity? NICE's considerations over equity.
    Soares MO
    Br Med Bull; 2012; 101():17-31. PubMed ID: 22331197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.