These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23205343)

  • 1. Explicit feedback to enhance the effect of an interim assessment: a cross-over study on learning effect and gender difference.
    Olde Bekkink M; Donders R; van Muijen GNP; de Waal RMW; Ruiter DJ
    Perspect Med Educ; 2012 Nov; 1(4):180-191. PubMed ID: 23205343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Challenging medical students with an interim assessment: a positive effect on formal examination score in a randomized controlled study.
    Olde Bekkink M; Donders R; van Muijen GN; Ruiter DJ
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2012 Mar; 17(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 21442416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uncovering students' misconceptions by assessment of their written questions.
    Olde Bekkink M; Donders AR; Kooloos JG; de Waal RM; Ruiter DJ
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Aug; 16(1):221. PubMed ID: 27558400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Post-exam feedback with question rationales improves re-test performance of medical students on a multiple-choice exam.
    Levant B; Zückert W; Paolo A
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2018 Dec; 23(5):995-1003. PubMed ID: 30043313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Certainty-based marking in a formative assessment improves student course appreciation but not summative examination scores.
    Hendriks WJAJ; Bakker N; Pluk H; de Brouwer A; Wieringa B; Cambi A; Zegers M; Wansink DG; Leunissen R; Klaren PHM
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 May; 19(1):178. PubMed ID: 31151456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Immediate detailed feedback to test-enhanced learning: an effective online educational tool.
    Wojcikowski K; Kirk L
    Med Teach; 2013 Nov; 35(11):915-9. PubMed ID: 24003913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Promoting an active form of learning out-of-class via answering online "study questions" leads to higher than expected exam scores in General Biology.
    Gibson SI
    PeerJ; 2015; 3():e1322. PubMed ID: 26500828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of a Web-based question database for students' self-assessment.
    Hammoud MM; Barclay ML
    Acad Med; 2002 Sep; 77(9):925. PubMed ID: 12228094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of immediate feedback on the learning of medical students in pharmacology.
    Badyal DK; Bala S; Singh T; Gulrez G
    J Adv Med Educ Prof; 2019 Jan; 7(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 30697542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of Grading and Class Rank on Performance in a Surgical Simulation Course.
    Ferrin N; Zarbock T; Tieman M
    J Surg Educ; 2020; 77(1):166-177. PubMed ID: 31326412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integrating students' reflection-in-learning and examination performance as a method for providing educational feedback.
    Devi V; Mandal T; Kodidela S; Pallath V
    J Postgrad Med; 2012; 58(4):270-4. PubMed ID: 23298922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sustained impact of a short small group course with systematic feedback in addition to regular clinical clerkship activities on musculoskeletal examination skills--a controlled study.
    Perrig M; Berendonk C; Rogausch A; Beyeler C
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Jan; 16():35. PubMed ID: 26821664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Longitudinal Study of Student Feedback Integration in Medical Examination Development.
    Hajj Hussein I; Braithwaite C; Uhley V; Mohiyeddini C
    J CME; 2024; 13(1):2352964. PubMed ID: 38766492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two-stage collaborative group testing does not improve retention of anatomy among students studying medical radiation technology.
    Bentley DC; Attardi SM; Faul J; Melo V; Palmer C
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2021 Dec; 52(4S):S96-S109. PubMed ID: 34583909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Moving toward Mastery: Changes in Student Perceptions of Clerkship Assessment with Pass/Fail Grading and Enhanced Feedback.
    Bullock JL; Seligman L; Lai CJ; O'Sullivan PS; Hauer KE
    Teach Learn Med; 2022; 34(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 34014793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improved class preparation and learning through immediate feedback in group testing for undergraduate nursing students.
    Peck SD; Werner JL; Raleigh DM
    Nurs Educ Perspect; 2013; 34(6):400-4. PubMed ID: 24475602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of feedback during formative testing on study behaviour and performance of (bio)medical students: a randomised controlled study.
    Thijssen DHJ; Hopman MTE; van Wijngaarden MT; Hoenderop JGJ; Bindels RJM; Eijsvogels TMH
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 Apr; 19(1):97. PubMed ID: 30943962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of Interactive Lectures and Formative Assessment on Learning of Epidemiology by Medical Undergraduates - A Mixed-Methods Evaluation.
    Venugopal V; Dongre AR
    Indian J Community Med; 2020; 45(4):526-530. PubMed ID: 33623215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of a Near Peer Tutoring Program to Improve Medical Students' Note Writing Skills.
    Olvet DM; Wackett A; Crichlow S; Baldelli P
    Teach Learn Med; 2022; 34(4):425-433. PubMed ID: 32088996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.