These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23205510)

  • 21. Additive and interactive effects in semantic priming: Isolating lexical and decision processes in the lexical decision task.
    Yap MJ; Balota DA; Tan SE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):140-58. PubMed ID: 22612169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Semantic priming effects from single words in a lexical decision task.
    Noguera C; Ortells JJ; Abad MJ; Carmona E; Daza MT
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Jun; 125(2):175-202. PubMed ID: 16950164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Modulation of additive and interactive effects in lexical decision by trial history.
    Masson ME; Kliegl R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):898-914. PubMed ID: 22774856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dissociating stimulus-stimulus and response-response effects in the Stroop task.
    Schmidt JR; Cheesman J
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2005 Jun; 59(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 16035346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Lexical decision in children: sublexical processing or lexical search?
    van den Boer M; de Jong PF; Haentjens-van Meeteren MM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(6):1214-28. PubMed ID: 22489669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Primed lexical decision task in fearful and nonfearful individuals.
    Christopherson KM; Ferraro FR
    J Psychol; 2009 May; 143(3):267-78. PubMed ID: 19455855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Filling a gap in the semantic gradient: color associates and response set effects in the Stroop task.
    Risko EF; Schmidt JR; Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Apr; 13(2):310-5. PubMed ID: 16893000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The processing advantage and disadvantage for homophones in lexical decision tasks.
    Hino Y; Kusunose Y; Lupker SJ; Jared D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Mar; 39(2):529-51. PubMed ID: 22905930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Distractor modality can turn semantic interference into semantic facilitation in the picture-word interference task: implications for theories of lexical access in speech production.
    Hantsch A; Jescheniak JD; Schriefers H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1443-53. PubMed ID: 19857015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Novel word lexicalization and the prime lexicality effect.
    Qiao X; Forster KI
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1064-74. PubMed ID: 23088548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. From orthography to meaning: an electrophysiological investigation of the role of phonology in accessing meaning of Chinese single-character words.
    Wang K; Mecklinger A; Hofmann J; Weng X
    Neuroscience; 2010 Jan; 165(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 19800941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Is retrieval mediated after repeated testing?
    Kole JA; Healy AF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Mar; 39(2):462-72. PubMed ID: 22686841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. I see/hear what you mean: semantic activation in visual word recognition depends on perceptual attention.
    Connell L; Lynott D
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Apr; 143(2):527-33. PubMed ID: 24099578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Electrophysiology reveals semantic priming at a short SOA irrespective of depth of prime processing.
    Küper K; Heil M
    Neurosci Lett; 2009 Apr; 453(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 19356603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The relationship between knowing a word and reading it aloud in children's word reading development.
    Nation K; Cocksey J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Jul; 103(3):296-308. PubMed ID: 19410262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Examining word processing via a megastudy of conditional reading aloud.
    Cortese MJ; Yates M; Schock J; Vilks L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Nov; 71(11):2295-2313. PubMed ID: 30362414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Stroop effects on redemption and semantic effects on confession: simultaneous automatic activation of embedded and carrier words.
    Iani C; Job R; Padovani R; Nicoletti R
    Cogn Process; 2009 Nov; 10(4):327-34. PubMed ID: 19301049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Why do non-color words interfere with color naming?
    Burt JS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Oct; 28(5):1019-38. PubMed ID: 12421053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Converging evidence for control of color-word Stroop interference at the item level.
    Bugg JM; Hutchison KA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):433-49. PubMed ID: 22845037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Word processing in the parafoveal region.
    Lee CH; Kim K
    Int J Psychol; 2009 Oct; 44(5):369-77. PubMed ID: 22029615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.