These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23205594)

  • 1. Cry me a river: identifying the behavioral consequences of extremely high-stakes interpersonal deception.
    Ten Brinke L; Porter S
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Dec; 36(6):469-477. PubMed ID: 23205594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Physically scarce (vs. enriched) environments decrease the ability to tell lies successfully.
    Ten Brinke L; Khambatta P; Carney DR
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2015 Oct; 144(5):982-92. PubMed ID: 26301794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reading between the lies: identifying concealed and falsified emotions in universal facial expressions.
    Porter S; ten Brinke L
    Psychol Sci; 2008 May; 19(5):508-14. PubMed ID: 18466413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interpersonal Consequences of Deceptive Expressions of Sadness.
    Gunderson CA; Baker A; Pence AD; Ten Brinke L
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2023 Jan; 49(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 34906011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reading Lies: Nonverbal Communication and Deception.
    Vrij A; Hartwig M; Granhag PA
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2019 Jan; 70():295-317. PubMed ID: 30609913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Are computers effective lie detectors? A meta-analysis of linguistic cues to deception.
    Hauch V; Blandón-Gitlin I; Masip J; Sporer SL
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2015 Nov; 19(4):307-42. PubMed ID: 25387767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Telling ingratiating lies: effects of target sex and target attractiveness on verbal and nonverbal deceptive success.
    DePaulo BM; Stone JI; Lassiter GD
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1985 May; 48(5):1191-203. PubMed ID: 3998987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deception Detection and Truth Detection Are Dependent on Different Cognitive and Emotional Traits: An Investigation of Emotional Intelligence, Theory of Mind, and Attention.
    Stewart SLK; Wright C; Atherton C
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2019 May; 45(5):794-807. PubMed ID: 30264653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The inhibitory spillover effect: Controlling the bladder makes better liars.
    Fenn E; Blandón-Gitlin I; Coons J; Pineda C; Echon R
    Conscious Cogn; 2015 Dec; 37():112-22. PubMed ID: 26366466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Deception Cues During High-Risk Situations: 911 Homicide Calls.
    Markey PM; Feeney E; Berry B; Hopkins L; Creedon I
    Psychol Sci; 2022 Jul; 33(7):1040-1047. PubMed ID: 35687501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Deception detection: interrogators' and observers' decoding of consecutive statements.
    Granhag PA; Strömwall LA
    J Psychol; 2001 Nov; 135(6):603-20. PubMed ID: 11931002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Increasing cognitive load to facilitate lie detection: the benefit of recalling an event in reverse order.
    Vrij A; Mann SA; Fisher RP; Leal S; Milne R; Bull R
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Jun; 32(3):253-65. PubMed ID: 17694424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. T-Pattern Analysis and Cognitive Load Manipulation to Detect Low-Stake Lies: An Exploratory Study.
    Diana B; Zurloni V; Elia M; Cavalera C; Realdon O; Jonsson GK; Anguera MT
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():257. PubMed ID: 29551986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Subjective cues to deception/honesty in a high stakes situation: an exploratory approach.
    Wright Whelan C; Wagstaff GF; Wheatcroft JM
    J Psychol; 2015; 149(5):517-34. PubMed ID: 25975577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. You want to know the truth? Then don't mimic!
    Stel M; van Dijk E; Olivier E
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Jun; 20(6):693-9. PubMed ID: 19422628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of task-irrelevant emotional information on deception.
    Liang J; Chen YH; Yan WJ; Qu F; Fu X
    Cogn Emot; 2018 Sep; 32(6):1265-1274. PubMed ID: 29157084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Connection Between Deception Detection and Financial Exploitation of Older (vs. Young) Adults.
    Gunderson CA; Ten Brinke L
    J Appl Gerontol; 2022 Apr; 41(4):940-944. PubMed ID: 34636708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceived deception in negotiation: Consequences and the mediating role of trust.
    Au AKC; Wong NCQ
    J Soc Psychol; 2019; 159(4):459-473. PubMed ID: 30683017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Different physiological reactions when observing lies versus truths: Initial evidence and an intervention to enhance accuracy.
    Ten Brinke L; Lee JJ; Carney DR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Sep; 117(3):560-578. PubMed ID: 30869984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Behavioral cues to deception vs. topic incriminating potential in criminal confessions.
    Davis M; Markus KA; Walters SB; Vorus N; Connors B
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Dec; 29(6):683-704. PubMed ID: 16382356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.