These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23205889)

  • 1. Testing adaptive toolbox models: a Bayesian hierarchical approach.
    Scheibehenne B; Rieskamp J; Wagenmakers EJ
    Psychol Rev; 2013 Jan; 120(1):39-64. PubMed ID: 23205889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Heterogeneity of rules in Bayesian reasoning: A toolbox analysis.
    Woike JK; Hertwig R; Gigerenzer G
    Cogn Psychol; 2023 Jun; 143():101564. PubMed ID: 37178617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bayesian outcome-based strategy classification.
    Lee MD
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Mar; 48(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 25697091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Learning a commonsense moral theory.
    Kleiman-Weiner M; Saxe R; Tenenbaum JB
    Cognition; 2017 Oct; 167():107-123. PubMed ID: 28351662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian Fundamentalism or Enlightenment? On the explanatory status and theoretical contributions of Bayesian models of cognition.
    Jones M; Love BC
    Behav Brain Sci; 2011 Aug; 34(4):169-88; disuccsion 188-231. PubMed ID: 21864419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three case studies in the Bayesian analysis of cognitive models.
    Lee MD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Feb; 15(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 18605474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Theory-based Bayesian models of inductive learning and reasoning.
    Tenenbaum JB; Griffiths TL; Kemp C
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2006 Jul; 10(7):309-18. PubMed ID: 16797219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How does aging affect recognition-based inference? A hierarchical Bayesian modeling approach.
    Horn SS; Pachur T; Mata R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Jan; 154():77-85. PubMed ID: 25526294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the importance of avoiding shortcuts in applying cognitive models to hierarchical data.
    Boehm U; Marsman M; Matzke D; Wagenmakers EJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Aug; 50(4):1614-1631. PubMed ID: 29949071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Learning physical parameters from dynamic scenes.
    Ullman TD; Stuhlmüller A; Goodman ND; Tenenbaum JB
    Cogn Psychol; 2018 Aug; 104():57-82. PubMed ID: 29653395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Causal learning and inference as a rational process: the new synthesis.
    Holyoak KJ; Cheng PW
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2011; 62():135-63. PubMed ID: 21126179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Towards competitive instead of biased testing of heuristics: a reply to hilbig and richter (2011).
    Brighton H; Gigerenzer G
    Top Cogn Sci; 2011 Jan; 3(1):197-205. PubMed ID: 25164182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian just-so stories in psychology and neuroscience.
    Bowers JS; Davis CJ
    Psychol Bull; 2012 May; 138(3):389-414. PubMed ID: 22545686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pseudocontingencies: an integrative account of an intriguing cognitive illusion.
    Fiedler K; Freytag P; Meiser T
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Jan; 116(1):187-206. PubMed ID: 19159153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Win-Stay, Lose-Sample: a simple sequential algorithm for approximating Bayesian inference.
    Bonawitz E; Denison S; Gopnik A; Griffiths TL
    Cogn Psychol; 2014 Nov; 74():35-65. PubMed ID: 25086501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Approximating Bayesian Inference through Model Simulation.
    Turner BM; Van Zandt T
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2018 Sep; 22(9):826-840. PubMed ID: 30093313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bayesian learning and the psychology of rule induction.
    Endress AD
    Cognition; 2013 May; 127(2):159-76. PubMed ID: 23454791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extended Bayesian inference incorporating symmetry bias.
    Shinohara S; Manome N; Suzuki K; Chung UI; Takahashi T; Gunji PY; Nakajima Y; Mitsuyoshi S
    Biosystems; 2020 Apr; 190():104104. PubMed ID: 32027940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hierarchical Bayesian models of cognitive development.
    Glassen T; Nitsch V
    Biol Cybern; 2016 Jun; 110(2-3):217-27. PubMed ID: 27222110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamic models of choice.
    Heathcote A; Lin YS; Reynolds A; Strickland L; Gretton M; Matzke D
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Apr; 51(2):961-985. PubMed ID: 29959755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.