These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23206132)

  • 1. Female choosiness leads to the evolution of individually distinctive males.
    Thom MD; Dytham C
    Evolution; 2012 Dec; 66(12):3736-42. PubMed ID: 23206132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Male versus female mate choice: sexual selection and the evolution of species recognition via reinforcement.
    Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2007 Dec; 61(12):2772-89. PubMed ID: 17924955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The evolution of female mating preferences: differentiation from species with promiscuous males can promote speciation.
    McPeek MA; Gavrilets S
    Evolution; 2006 Oct; 60(10):1967-80. PubMed ID: 17133854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.
    Fedina TY; Lewis SM
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Make love not war: when should less competitive males choose low-quality but defendable females?
    Venner S; Bernstein C; Dray S; Bel-Venner MC
    Am Nat; 2010 Jun; 175(6):650-61. PubMed ID: 20415532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The evolution and significance of male mate choice.
    Edward DA; Chapman T
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2011 Dec; 26(12):647-54. PubMed ID: 21890230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How choosy should I be? The relative searching time predicts evolution of choosiness under direct sexual selection.
    Etienne L; Rousset F; Godelle B; Courtiol A
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Jun; 281(1785):20140190. PubMed ID: 24789896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evolution of mate choice for genome-wide heterozygosity.
    Fromhage L; Kokko H; Reid JM
    Evolution; 2009 Mar; 63(3):684-94. PubMed ID: 19220455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Male mating constraints affect mutual mate choice: prudent male courting and sperm-limited females.
    Härdling R; Gosden T; Aguilée R
    Am Nat; 2008 Aug; 172(2):259-71. PubMed ID: 18588428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sex differences in mate recognition and conspecific preference in species with mutual mate choice.
    Kozak GM; Reisland M; Boughmann JW
    Evolution; 2009 Feb; 63(2):353-65. PubMed ID: 19154359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sexual signals and mating patterns in Syngnathidae.
    Rosenqvist G; Berglund A
    J Fish Biol; 2011 Jun; 78(6):1647-61. PubMed ID: 21651521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mate sampling influences the intensity of sexual selection and the evolution of costly sexual ornaments.
    Muniz DG; Machado G
    J Theor Biol; 2018 Jun; 447():74-83. PubMed ID: 29567325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A preference for a sexual signal keeps females safe.
    Kim TW; Christy JH; Choe JC
    PLoS One; 2007 May; 2(5):e422. PubMed ID: 17487270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Female resistance to sexual coercion can evolve to preserve the indirect benefits of mate choice.
    Snow SS; Alonzo SH; Servedio MR; Prum RO
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Jun; 32(6):545-558. PubMed ID: 30817033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Male courtship attractiveness and paternity success in Photinus greeni fireflies.
    Demary KC; Lewis SM
    Evolution; 2007 Feb; 61(2):431-9. PubMed ID: 17348952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modelling the evolution of female choice strategies under inbreeding conditions.
    Reinhold K
    Genetica; 2002 Nov; 116(2-3):189-95. PubMed ID: 12555777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Female mate preferences in Drosophila simulans: evolution and costs.
    Sharma MD; Tregenza T; Hosken DJ
    J Evol Biol; 2010 Aug; 23(8):1672-9. PubMed ID: 20546089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Replicator-dynamics models of sexual conflict.
    Kimura M; Ihara Y
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Sep; 260(1):90-7. PubMed ID: 19505480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can non-directional male mating preferences facilitate honest female ornamentation?
    Chenoweth SF; Doughty P; Kokko H
    Ecol Lett; 2006 Feb; 9(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 16958883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Deadbeats or losers: Discretionary male parental investment can make females less choosy.
    Meacham F; Getty T
    J Theor Biol; 2017 Jun; 422():50-58. PubMed ID: 28414086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.