These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23206132)

  • 21. Evolution of ape and human mating systems.
    Nakahashi W; Horiuchi S
    J Theor Biol; 2012 Mar; 296():56-64. PubMed ID: 22155135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Indirect mate choice, direct mate choice and species recognition in a bower-building cichlid fish lek.
    Genner MJ; Young KA; Haesler MP; Joyce DA
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Sep; 21(5):1387-96. PubMed ID: 18547351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Evolution of Mutual Mate Choice under Direct Benefits.
    Courtiol A; Etienne L; Feron R; Godelle B; Rousset F
    Am Nat; 2016 Nov; 188(5):521-538. PubMed ID: 27788341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Females benefit from multiple mating but not multiple mates in the burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides.
    House CM; Walling CA; Stamper CE; Moore AJ
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Sep; 22(9):1961-6. PubMed ID: 19682308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Density-dependent selection on mate search and evolution of Allee effects.
    Berec L; Kramer AM; Bernhauerová V; Drake JM
    J Anim Ecol; 2018 Jan; 87(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 28240356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sexual selection drives the evolution of antiaphrodisiac pheromones in butterflies.
    Estrada C; Schulz S; Yildizhan S; Gilbert LE
    Evolution; 2011 Oct; 65(10):2843-54. PubMed ID: 21967426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Indirect benefits for choosy female grasshoppers (Chorthippus biguttulus)?
    Klappert K; Reinhold K
    Zoology (Jena); 2007; 110(5):354-9. PubMed ID: 17720463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The relative role of male vs. female mate choice in maintaining assortative pairing among discrete colour morphs.
    Pryke SR; Griffith SC
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Jul; 20(4):1512-21. PubMed ID: 17584244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An evolutionary limit to male mating success.
    McGuigan K; Van Homrigh A; Blows MW
    Evolution; 2008 Jun; 62(6):1528-37. PubMed ID: 18363864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A theoretical study on the evolution of male parental care and female multiple mating: effects of female mate choice and male care bias.
    Seki M; Wakano JY; Ihara Y
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Jul; 247(2):281-96. PubMed ID: 17448499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Meta-analysis suggests choosy females get sexy sons more than "good genes".
    Prokop ZM; Michalczyk Ł; Drobniak SM; Herdegen M; Radwan J
    Evolution; 2012 Sep; 66(9):2665-73. PubMed ID: 22946794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assortative mating through a mechanism of sexual selection.
    Castro L; Toro MA
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Dec; 243(3):386-92. PubMed ID: 16928384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A cognitive framework for mate choice and species recognition.
    Phelps SM; Rand AS; Ryan MJ
    Am Nat; 2006 Jan; 167(1):28-42. PubMed ID: 16475097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Female competition and its evolutionary consequences in mammals.
    Stockley P; Bro-Jørgensen J
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2011 May; 86(2):341-66. PubMed ID: 20636474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Genetic variation in male attractiveness: It is time to see the forest for the trees.
    Prokop ZM; Drobniak SM
    Evolution; 2016 Apr; 70(4):913-21. PubMed ID: 26940698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Stronger convex (stabilizing) selection on homologous sexual display traits in females than in males: a multipopulation comparison in Drosophila serrata.
    Rundle HD; Chenoweth SF
    Evolution; 2011 Mar; 65(3):893-9. PubMed ID: 21361917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes.
    Neff BD; Pitcher TE
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Jan; 14(1):19-38. PubMed ID: 15643948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Female mate choice across mating stages and between sequential mates in flour beetles.
    Fedina TY; Lewis SM
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Nov; 20(6):2138-43. PubMed ID: 17903187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Direct detection of male quality can facilitate the evolution of female choosiness and indicators of good genes: Evolution across a continuum of indicator mechanisms.
    Dhole S; Stern CA; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2018 Apr; 72(4):770-784. PubMed ID: 29528491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Female alternative reproductive behaviors: the effect of female group size on mate assessment and copying.
    Brennan BJ; Flaxman SM; Alonzo SH
    J Theor Biol; 2008 Aug; 253(3):561-9. PubMed ID: 18511084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.