These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23206351)

  • 1. An accurate formula to calculate exclusion power of marker sets in parentage assignment.
    Vandeputte M
    Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Dec; 44(1):36. PubMed ID: 23206351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genetic evaluation using parentage information from genetic markers.
    Dodds KG; Tate ML; Sise JA
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Oct; 83(10):2271-9. PubMed ID: 16160036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On marker-based parentage verification via non-linear optimization.
    Boerner V
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jun; 49(1):50. PubMed ID: 28619083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Parentage and sibship exclusions: higher statistical power with more family members.
    Wang J
    Heredity (Edinb); 2007 Aug; 99(2):205-17. PubMed ID: 17487215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of genotyping errors on parentage exclusion analysis.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Nov; 19(22):5061-78. PubMed ID: 20964757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analytical and statistical consideration on the use of the ISAG-ICAR-SNP bovine panel for parentage control, using the Illumina BeadChip technology: example on the German Holstein population.
    Schütz E; Brenig B
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):3. PubMed ID: 25651826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of microsatellites and parentage testing in saltwater crocodiles.
    Isberg SR; Chen Y; Barker SG; Moran C
    J Hered; 2004; 95(5):445-9. PubMed ID: 15388772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. SNP panels for the estimation of dairy breed proportion and parentage assignment in African crossbred dairy cattle.
    Gebrehiwot NZ; Strucken EM; Marshall K; Aliloo H; Gibson JP
    Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Mar; 53(1):21. PubMed ID: 33653262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modeling pedigree accuracy and uncertain parentage in single-step genomic evaluations of simulated and US Holstein datasets.
    Bradford HL; Masuda Y; Cole JB; Misztal I; VanRaden PM
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Mar; 102(3):2308-2318. PubMed ID: 30639024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparisons of three probability formulae for parentage exclusion.
    Jamieson A; Taylor SC
    Anim Genet; 1997 Dec; 28(6):397-400. PubMed ID: 9616104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness of 10 polymorphic microsatellite markers for parentage and pedigree analysis in plateau pika (Ochotona curzoniae).
    Li K; Geng J; Qu J; Zhang Y; Hu S
    BMC Genet; 2010 Nov; 11():101. PubMed ID: 21062500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Application of DNA markers in parentage verification of Boran cattle in Kenya.
    Kios D; van Marle-Köster E; Visser C
    Trop Anim Health Prod; 2012 Mar; 44(3):471-6. PubMed ID: 21739133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Power of exclusion for parentage verification and probability of match for identity in American Kennel Club breeds using 17 canine microsatellite markers.
    DeNise S; Johnston E; Halverson J; Marshall K; Rosenfeld D; McKenna S; Sharp T; Edwards J
    Anim Genet; 2004 Feb; 35(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 14731224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using genomic relationship likelihood for parentage assignment.
    Grashei KE; Ødegård J; Meuwissen THE
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 May; 50(1):26. PubMed ID: 29776335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetic tests for estimating dairy breed proportion and parentage assignment in East African crossbred cattle.
    Strucken EM; Al-Mamun HA; Esquivelzeta-Rabell C; Gondro C; Mwai OA; Gibson JP
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Sep; 49(1):67. PubMed ID: 28899355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exclusion and Genomic Relatedness Methods for Assignment of Parentage Using Genotyping-by-Sequencing Data.
    Dodds KG; McEwan JC; Brauning R; van Stijn TC; Rowe SJ; McEwan KM; Clarke SM
    G3 (Bethesda); 2019 Oct; 9(10):3239-3247. PubMed ID: 31383721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. DNA-based paternity analysis and genetic evaluation in a large, commercial cattle ranch setting.
    Van Eenennaam AL; Weaber RL; Drake DJ; Penedo MC; Quaas RL; Garrick DJ; Pollak EJ
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Dec; 85(12):3159-69. PubMed ID: 17878282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of Genomic Prediction in Synthetic Populations Depending on the Number of Parents, Relatedness, and Ancestral Linkage Disequilibrium.
    Schopp P; Müller D; Technow F; Melchinger AE
    Genetics; 2017 Jan; 205(1):441-454. PubMed ID: 28049710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of genetic markers on selection.
    Davis GP; DeNise SK
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Sep; 76(9):2331-9. PubMed ID: 9781489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficient parentage assignment and pedigree reconstruction with dense single nucleotide polymorphism data.
    Hayes BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Apr; 94(4):2114-7. PubMed ID: 21427003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.