BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23206415)

  • 1. Widening access to research publications.
    Sandall J
    Midwifery; 2012 Dec; 28(6):727. PubMed ID: 23206415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Information access. NIH public access policy.
    Zerhouni EA
    Science; 2004 Dec; 306(5703):1895. PubMed ID: 15591188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The public-access movement.
    Paquette M
    Perspect Psychiatr Care; 2005; 41(2):49-50. PubMed ID: 15924574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Open access and scientific societies.
    Doyle H; Gass A; Kennison R
    PLoS Biol; 2004 May; 2(5):E156. PubMed ID: 15138514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Connections between open access publishing and access to gray literature.
    Banks M
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2004 Apr; 92(2):164-6. PubMed ID: 15088074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electronic publishing. Who owns, who pays? U.K., U.S. offer answers for journals.
    Malakoff D; Bachtold D
    Science; 2003 Jul; 301(5629):29. PubMed ID: 12843365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predatory publishing: Take care that you are not caught in the Open Access net.
    Stone TE; Rossiter RC
    Nurs Health Sci; 2015 Sep; 17(3):277-9. PubMed ID: 26224548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Open access in medical publishing: trends and countertrends.
    CMAJ; 2005 Jan; 172(2):149, 151. PubMed ID: 15655217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The downside of open-access publishing.
    Haug C
    N Engl J Med; 2013 Feb; 368(9):791-3. PubMed ID: 23445091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. "Academic spring" sees widening boycott of Elsevier.
    Epstein K
    BMJ; 2012 Feb; 344():e1469. PubMed ID: 22371860
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scientific publishing. Open access gains support; fees and journal quality deter submissions.
    Vogel G
    Science; 2011 Jan; 331(6015):273. PubMed ID: 21252322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Drinking from the firehose of scientific publishing.
    Patil C; Siegel V
    Dis Model Mech; 2009; 2(3-4):100-2. PubMed ID: 19259377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Open access publishing.
    Rankin JA; Franklin SG
    Emerg Infect Dis; 2004 Jul; 10(7):1352. PubMed ID: 15338570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The crisis in scholarly publishing: open access to the rescue?
    Oren GA
    J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 28(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 18347450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reader beware!
    Berlet GC
    Foot Ankle Spec; 2013 Aug; 6(4):262. PubMed ID: 23883865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. PLoS stays afloat with bulk publishing.
    Butler D
    Nature; 2008 Jul; 454(7200):11. PubMed ID: 18596768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Open access--pass the buck.
    Leptin M
    Science; 2012 Mar; 335(6074):1279. PubMed ID: 22422945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Merchants of mayhem.
    Nelson B
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 May; 124(5):301-2. PubMed ID: 27176736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The cloudy future of science publishing.
    Biotechniques; 2015 Feb; 58(2):49. PubMed ID: 25786265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scientific publishing. Opening the books on open access.
    Malakoff D
    Science; 2003 Oct; 302(5645):550-4. PubMed ID: 14576392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.