These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Perceptual dominance during binocular rivalry is prolonged by a dynamic surround. Takase S; Yukumatsu S; Bingushi K Vision Res; 2013 Nov; 92():33-8. PubMed ID: 24041849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Audiovisual interactions in binocular rivalry. Conrad V; Bartels A; Kleiner M; Noppeney U J Vis; 2010 Aug; 10(10):27. PubMed ID: 20884492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inter-ocular transfer of stimulus cueing in dominance selection at the onset of binocular rivalry. Kamphuisen AP; van Wezel RJ; van Ee R Vision Res; 2007 Apr; 47(9):1142-4. PubMed ID: 17360017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Binocular rivalry reveals a dissociation between the subjective experience and induced gamma oscillations. Fairhall SL; Hamm JP; Kirk IJ Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Jan; 27(1):213-6. PubMed ID: 18184322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Binocular rivalry: a window into emotional processing in aging. Bannerman RL; Regener P; Sahraie A Psychol Aging; 2011 Jun; 26(2):372-80. PubMed ID: 21443353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Binocular rivalry: a time dependence of eye and stimulus contributions. Bartels A; Logothetis NK J Vis; 2010 Oct; 10(12):3. PubMed ID: 21047735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Individual differences in sensory eye dominance reflected in the dynamics of binocular rivalry. Dieter KC; Sy JL; Blake R Vision Res; 2017 Dec; 141():40-50. PubMed ID: 27756700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Age-dependency in binocular rivalry is reflected by exclusive percepts, not mixed percepts. Arani E; van Ee R; van Wezel R Sci Rep; 2019 Dec; 9(1):19271. PubMed ID: 31848422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stimulus flicker alters interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Knapen T; Paffen C; Kanai R; van Ee R Vision Res; 2007 Jan; 47(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 17083956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Disrupting parietal function prolongs dominance durations in binocular rivalry. Zaretskaya N; Thielscher A; Logothetis NK; Bartels A Curr Biol; 2010 Dec; 20(23):2106-11. PubMed ID: 21093263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How does binocular rivalry emerge from cortical mechanisms of 3-D vision? Grossberg S; Yazdanbakhsh A; Cao Y; Swaminathan G Vision Res; 2008 Sep; 48(21):2232-50. PubMed ID: 18640145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Voluntary control and the dynamics of perceptual bi-stability. van Ee R; van Dam LC; Brouwer GJ Vision Res; 2005 Jan; 45(1):41-55. PubMed ID: 15571737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A fresh look at interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Lee SH; Blake R Vision Res; 2004 May; 44(10):983-91. PubMed ID: 15031091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perceptual rivalry: reflexes reveal the gradual nature of visual awareness. Naber M; Frässle S; Einhäuser W PLoS One; 2011; 6(6):e20910. PubMed ID: 21677786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures. Meng M; Tong F J Vis; 2004 Jul; 4(7):539-51. PubMed ID: 15330700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimal physiological conditions for binocular rivalry and rivalry memory. Wilson HR Vision Res; 2007 Sep; 47(21):2741-50. PubMed ID: 17764714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]