149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23206613)
1. Preoperative evaluation of perinephric fat invasion in patients with renal cell carcinoma: correlation with pathological findings.
Hedgire SS; Elmi A; Nadkarni ND; Cao K; McDermott S; Harisinghani MG
Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 23206613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Combined renal sinus fat and perinephric fat renal cell carcinoma invasion has a worse prognosis than either alone.
Kresowik TP; Johnson MT; Joudi FN
J Urol; 2010 Jul; 184(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 20478592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preoperative Computed Tomography Assessment for Perinephric Fat Invasion: Comparison With Pathological Staging.
Landman J; Park JY; Zhao C; Baker M; Hofmann M; Helmy M; Lall C; Bozoghlanian M; Okhunov Z
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2017; 41(5):702-707. PubMed ID: 28296683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Renal cell carcinoma: role of MR imaging in the assessment of muscular venous branch invasion.
Karlo CA; Di Paolo PL; Donati OF; Russo P; Tickoo S; Hricak H; Akin O
Radiology; 2013 May; 267(2):454-9. PubMed ID: 23418001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Renal sinus fat invasion in pT3a clear cell renal cell carcinoma affects outcomes of patients without nodal involvement or distant metastases.
Bertini R; Roscigno M; Freschi M; Strada E; Petralia G; Pasta A; Matloob R; Sozzi F; Da Pozzo L; Colombo R; Guazzoni G; Doglioni C; Montorsi F; Rigatti P
J Urol; 2009 May; 181(5):2027-32. PubMed ID: 19286201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic significance of perinephric fat infiltration and tumor size in renal cell carcinoma.
Yoo C; Song C; Hong JH; Kim CS; Ahn H
J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):486-91; discussion 491. PubMed ID: 18550101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Location of extrarenal tumor extension does not impact survival of patients with pT3a renal cell carcinoma.
Margulis V; Tamboli P; Matin SF; Meisner M; Swanson DA; Wood CG
J Urol; 2007 Nov; 178(5):1878-82. PubMed ID: 17868733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic value of multidetector computed tomography for renal sinus fat invasion in renal cell carcinoma patients.
Kim C; Choi HJ; Cho KS
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jun; 83(6):914-918. PubMed ID: 24713489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic performance of multidetector computed tomography in the evaluation of perinephric fat invasion in renal cell carcinoma patients.
Kim C; Choi HJ; Cho KS
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(2):268-73. PubMed ID: 24448501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Significance of the pseudocapsule on MRI of renal neoplasms and its potential application for local staging: a retrospective study.
Roy C; El Ghali S; Buy X; Lindner V; Lang H; Saussine C; Jacqmin D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jan; 184(1):113-20. PubMed ID: 15615960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preoperative staging of renal cell carcinoma using magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with pathological staging.
Spero M; Brkljacic B; Kolaric B; Marotti M
Clin Imaging; 2010; 34(6):441-7. PubMed ID: 21092873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predicting ease of perinephric fat dissection at time of open partial nephrectomy using preoperative fat density characteristics.
Zheng Y; Espiritu P; Hakky T; Jutras K; Spiess PE
BJU Int; 2014 Dec; 114(6):872-80. PubMed ID: 24274617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of perinephric fat surface area and Mayo Adhesive Probability score in predicting malignancy in T1 renal masses.
Bernstein AP; Fram EB; Sankin A; Kovac E; Srivastava A; DiVito J; Stern JM
Urol Oncol; 2018 Nov; 36(11):499.e17-499.e22. PubMed ID: 30166240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of intracaval and intracardiac extension of renal cell carcinoma.
Raj V; Alpendurada F; Christmas T; Moat NE; Mohiaddin RH
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Oct; 144(4):845-51. PubMed ID: 22177095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reappraisal of T3N0/NxM0 renal cell carcinoma: significance of extent of fat invasion, renal vein invasion, and adrenal invasion.
Jung SJ; Ro JY; Truong LD; Ayala AG; Shen SS
Hum Pathol; 2008 Nov; 39(11):1689-94. PubMed ID: 18656240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic implication of capsular invasion without perinephric fat infiltration in localized renal cell carcinoma.
Jeong IG; Jeong CW; Hong SK; Kwak C; Lee E; Lee SE
Urology; 2006 Apr; 67(4):709-12. PubMed ID: 16566981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomography for conservative renal surgery in an ex vivo tumor enucleation study followed by step-sectioning.
Gschwend JE; Vogel U; Bader C; Mattfeldt T; Hautmann RE
J Urol; 1996 Feb; 155(2):451-4. PubMed ID: 8558633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Renal neoplasms amenable to partial nephrectomy: MR imaging.
Pretorius ES; Siegelman ES; Ramchandani P; Cangiano T; Banner MP
Radiology; 1999 Jul; 212(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 10405716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stage T3a renal cell carcinoma: staging accuracy of CT for sinus fat, perinephric fat or renal vein invasion.
Sokhi HK; Mok WY; Patel U
Br J Radiol; 2015 Jan; 88(1045):20140504. PubMed ID: 25410425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of CT in the assessment of muscular venous branch invasion in patients with renal cell carcinoma.
Karlo CA; Donati OF; Marigliano C; Tickoo SK; Hricak H; Russo P; Akin O
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Oct; 201(4):847-52. PubMed ID: 24059374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
