These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23206774)

  • 21. A laparoscopic surgical skills assessment tool for veterinarians.
    Fransson BA; Ragle CA; Bryan ME
    J Vet Med Educ; 2010; 37(3):304-13. PubMed ID: 20847341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Objective assessment of robotic surgical skill using instrument contact vibrations.
    Gomez ED; Aggarwal R; McMahan W; Bark K; Kuchenbecker KJ
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1419-31. PubMed ID: 26201410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessment of Robotic Console Skills (ARCS): construct validity of a novel global rating scale for technical skills in robotically assisted surgery.
    Liu M; Purohit S; Mazanetz J; Allen W; Kreaden US; Curet M
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):526-535. PubMed ID: 28667546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The impact of video games on training surgeons in the 21st century.
    Rosser JC; Lynch PJ; Cuddihy L; Gentile DA; Klonsky J; Merrell R
    Arch Surg; 2007 Feb; 142(2):181-6; discusssion 186. PubMed ID: 17309970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Content and face validity of a comprehensive robotic skills training program for general surgery, urology, and gynecology.
    Dulan G; Rege RV; Hogg DC; Gilberg-Fisher KK; Tesfay ST; Scott DJ
    Am J Surg; 2012 Apr; 203(4):535-9. PubMed ID: 22326049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Training, credentialing, proctoring and medicolegal risks of robotic urological surgery: recommendations of the society of urologic robotic surgeons.
    Zorn KC; Gautam G; Shalhav AL; Clayman RV; Ahlering TE; Albala DM; Lee DI; Sundaram CP; Matin SF; Castle EP; Winfield HN; Gettman MT; Lee BR; Thomas R; Patel VR; Leveillee RJ; Wong C; Badlani GH; Rha KH; Eggener SE; Wiklund P; Mottrie A; Atug F; Kural AR; Joseph JV;
    J Urol; 2009 Sep; 182(3):1126-32. PubMed ID: 19625032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Crowd-Sourced Assessment of Technical Skills: Differentiating Animate Surgical Skill Through the Wisdom of Crowds.
    Holst D; Kowalewski TM; White LW; Brand TC; Harper JD; Sorensen MD; Truong M; Simpson K; Tanaka A; Smith R; Lendvay TS
    J Endourol; 2015 Oct; 29(10):1183-8. PubMed ID: 25867006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Analysis of hand motion differentiates expert and novice surgeons.
    Uemura M; Tomikawa M; Kumashiro R; Miao T; Souzaki R; Ieiri S; Ohuchida K; Lefor AT; Hashizume M
    J Surg Res; 2014 May; 188(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 24418518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Validation of a novel robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy surgical training model.
    Hung AJ; Ng CK; Patil MB; Zehnder P; Huang E; Aron M; Gill IS; Desai MM
    BJU Int; 2012 Sep; 110(6):870-4. PubMed ID: 22313582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. LapMentor metrics possess limited construct validity.
    Andreatta PB; Woodrum DT; Gauger PG; Minter RM
    Simul Healthc; 2008; 3(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 19088638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Construct validity of the endoscopic sinus surgery simulator: II. Assessment of discriminant validity and expert benchmarking.
    Fried MP; Sadoughi B; Weghorst SJ; Zeltsan M; Cuellar H; Uribe JI; Sasaki CT; Ross DA; Jacobs JB; Lebowitz RA; Satava RM
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Apr; 133(4):350-7. PubMed ID: 17438249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Simulating various levels of clinical challenge in the assessment of clinical procedure competence.
    Kyaw Tun J; Granados A; Mavroveli S; Nuttall S; Kadiyala AN; Brown R; Bello F; Kneebone RL
    Ann Emerg Med; 2012 Jul; 60(1):112-20.e5. PubMed ID: 22542307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Robotic approaches to prolapse surgery.
    Rosenblum N
    Curr Opin Urol; 2012 Jul; 22(4):292-6. PubMed ID: 22647648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Laparoscopic pelvic autonomic nerve-preserving surgery for patients with lower rectal cancer after chemoradiation therapy.
    Liang JT; Lai HS; Lee PH
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1285-7. PubMed ID: 17235719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Can virtual reality simulation be used for advanced bariatric surgical training?
    Lewis TM; Aggarwal R; Kwasnicki RM; Rajaretnam N; Moorthy K; Ahmed A; Darzi A
    Surgery; 2012 Jun; 151(6):779-84. PubMed ID: 22652118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Hidden Markov models of minimally invasive surgery.
    Rosen J; Richards C; Hannaford B; Sinanan M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 70():279-85. PubMed ID: 10977557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Face, content, and construct validity of dV-trainer, a novel virtual reality simulator for robotic surgery.
    Kenney PA; Wszolek MF; Gould JJ; Libertino JA; Moinzadeh A
    Urology; 2009 Jun; 73(6):1288-92. PubMed ID: 19362352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Laparoscopic decision making: impact of preoperative reading and laparoscopic experience.
    Samuelson ML; Cadeddu JA; Matsumoto ED
    J Urol; 2006 Oct; 176(4 Pt 1):1553-7. PubMed ID: 16952680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Task decomposition of laparoscopic surgery for objective evaluation of surgical residents' learning curve using hidden Markov model.
    Rosen J; Solazzo M; Hannaford B; Sinanan M
    Comput Aided Surg; 2002; 7(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 12173880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A computer-based laparoscopic skills assessment device differentiates experienced from novice laparoscopic surgeons.
    McNatt SS; Smith CD
    Surg Endosc; 2001 Oct; 15(10):1085-9. PubMed ID: 11727075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.