These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23207195)

  • 21. An evaluation of the radiopacity of composite restorative materials used in Class I and Class II cavities.
    van Dijken JW; Wing KR; Ruyter IE
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1989 Dec; 47(6):401-7. PubMed ID: 2609948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Influence of fluorescent whitening agent on the fluorescent emission of resin composites.
    Park MY; Lee YK; Lim BS
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jun; 23(6):731-5. PubMed ID: 16911821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of flowable composite and restorative technique on microleakage of class II restorations.
    Hernandes NM; Catelan A; Soares GP; Ambrosano GM; Lima DA; Marchi GM; Martins LR; Aguiar FH
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2014 Nov; 5(4):283-8. PubMed ID: 23946230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Marginal Gap Formation in Approximal "Bulk Fill" Resin Composite Restorations After Artificial Ageing.
    Peutzfeldt A; Mühlebach S; Lussi A; Flury S
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(2):180-189. PubMed ID: 29148914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Direct tooth-colored restorative materials: a comparative analysis of the fluorescence properties among different shades.
    Kiran R; Chapman J; Tennant M; Forrest A; Walsh LJ
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2020; 15(3):318-332. PubMed ID: 32760926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. In vitro evaluation of composite resin fluorescence after natural aging.
    Garrido TM; Hoshino LC; Hirata R; Sato F; Neto AM; Guidini VH; Terada RS
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2020 May; 12(5):e461-e467. PubMed ID: 32509228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of interfacial bond quality on the direction of polymerization shrinkage flow in resin composite restorations.
    Cho BH; Dickens SH; Bae JH; Chang CG; Son HH; Um CM
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 12022463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage in class V cavities.
    Yazici AR; Baseren M; Dayangaç B
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 12540117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Curing-light intensity and depth of cure of resin-based composites tested according to international standards.
    Fan PL; Schumacher RM; Azzolin K; Geary R; Eichmiller FC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Apr; 133(4):429-34; quiz 491-3. PubMed ID: 11991459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of light propagation in dental tissues and nano-filled resin-based composite.
    Elgendy H; Maia RR; Skiff F; Denehy G; Qian F
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Jan; 23(1):423-433. PubMed ID: 29713891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An in-vitro assessment of the shear bond strength of bulk-fill resin composites to permanent and deciduous teeth.
    Ilie N; Schöner C; Bücher K; Hickel R
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):850-5. PubMed ID: 24704081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
    Toledano M; Osorio E; Osorio R; García-Godoy F
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The strategies used for curing universal adhesives affect the micro-bond strength of resin cement used to lute indirect resin composites to human dentin.
    Araoka D; Hosaka K; Nakajima M; Foxton R; Thanatvarakorn O; Prasansuttiporn T; Chiba A; Sato K; Takahashi M; Otsuki M; Tagami J
    Dent Mater J; 2018 Jun; 37(3):506-514. PubMed ID: 29491200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An in vitro comparison of the effects of various air polishing powders on enamel and selected esthetic restorative materials.
    Barnes CM; Covey D; Watanabe H; Simetich B; Schulte JR; Chen H
    J Clin Dent; 2014; 25(4):76-87. PubMed ID: 26054183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. CAD-FE modeling and analysis of class II restorations incorporating resin-composite, glass ionomer and glass ceramic materials.
    Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Martorelli M; Lanzotti A; Gloria A; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2017 Dec; 33(12):1456-1465. PubMed ID: 29128128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Marginal adaptation of Class V restorations using different restorative techniques.
    Krejci I; Lutz F
    J Dent; 1991 Feb; 19(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 1901872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dentin-enamel adhesives in pediatric dentistry: an update.
    García-Godoy F; Donly KJ
    Pediatr Dent; 2015; 37(2):133-5. PubMed ID: 25905654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Color adjustment potential of resin composites.
    Trifkovic B; Powers JM; Paravina RD
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Apr; 22(3):1601-1607. PubMed ID: 29071561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Layering concepts in anterior composite restorations.
    Dietschi D
    J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 11317387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The physical properties of packable and conventional posterior resin-based composites: a comparison.
    Cobb DS; MacGregor KM; Vargas MA; Denehy GE
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2000 Nov; 131(11):1610-5. PubMed ID: 11103581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.