These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23208849)

  • 21. Bayesian bivariate meta-analysis of correlated effects: Impact of the prior distributions on the between-study correlation, borrowing of strength, and joint inferences.
    Burke DL; Bujkiewicz S; Riley RD
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Feb; 27(2):428-450. PubMed ID: 26988929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Combining multiple outcome measures in a meta-analysis: an application.
    Arends LR; Vokó Z; Stijnen T
    Stat Med; 2003 Apr; 22(8):1335-53. PubMed ID: 12687658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Measuring continuous baseline covariate imbalances in clinical trial data.
    Ciolino JD; Martin RH; Zhao W; Hill MD; Jauch EC; Palesch YY
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Apr; 24(2):255-72. PubMed ID: 21865270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Aggregate-data estimation of an individual patient data linear random effects meta-analysis with a patient covariate-treatment interaction term.
    Kovalchik SA
    Biostatistics; 2013 Apr; 14(2):273-83. PubMed ID: 23001065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An alternative model for bivariate random-effects meta-analysis when the within-study correlations are unknown.
    Riley RD; Thompson JR; Abrams KR
    Biostatistics; 2008 Jan; 9(1):172-86. PubMed ID: 17626226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Details of a prospective protocol for a collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data from all randomized trials of intravenous rt-PA vs. control: statistical analysis plan for the Stroke Thrombolysis Trialists' Collaborative meta-analysis.
    Stroke Thrombolysis Trialists' Collaborative Group
    Int J Stroke; 2013 Jun; 8(4):278-83. PubMed ID: 23639145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Multivariate meta-analysis of prognostic factor studies with multiple cut-points and/or methods of measurement.
    Riley RD; Elia EG; Malin G; Hemming K; Price MP
    Stat Med; 2015 Jul; 34(17):2481-96. PubMed ID: 25924725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Random effects meta-analysis of event outcome in the framework of the generalized linear mixed model with applications in sparse data.
    Stijnen T; Hamza TH; Ozdemir P
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(29):3046-67. PubMed ID: 20827667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Incorporating data from various trial designs into a mixed treatment comparison model.
    Schmitz S; Adams R; Walsh C
    Stat Med; 2013 Jul; 32(17):2935-49. PubMed ID: 23440610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Alternative methods for testing treatment effects on the basis of multiple outcomes: simulation and case study.
    Yoon FB; Fitzmaurice GM; Lipsitz SR; Horton NJ; Laird NM; Normand SL
    Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(16):1917-32. PubMed ID: 21538986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Factors affecting power of tests for multiple binary outcomes.
    Mascha EJ; Imrey PB
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(28):2890-904. PubMed ID: 20862669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An improved method for bivariate meta-analysis when within-study correlations are unknown.
    Hong C; D Riley R; Chen Y
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):73-88. PubMed ID: 29055096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Meta-analysis of randomised trials with a continuous outcome according to baseline imbalance and availability of individual participant data.
    Riley RD; Kauser I; Bland M; Thijs L; Staessen JA; Wang J; Gueyffier F; Deeks JJ
    Stat Med; 2013 Jul; 32(16):2747-66. PubMed ID: 23303608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Imputing intracluster correlation coefficients from a posterior predictive distribution is a feasible method of dealing with unit of analysis errors in a meta-analysis of cluster RCTs.
    Konnyu KJ; Taljaard M; Ivers NM; Moher D; Grimshaw JM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Nov; 139():307-318. PubMed ID: 34171503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Individual participant data meta-analysis of continuous outcomes: A comparison of approaches for specifying and estimating one-stage models.
    Legha A; Riley RD; Ensor J; Snell KIE; Morris TP; Burke DL
    Stat Med; 2018 Dec; 37(29):4404-4420. PubMed ID: 30101507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Individual participant data meta-analysis to examine interactions between treatment effect and participant-level covariates: Statistical recommendations for conduct and planning.
    Riley RD; Debray TPA; Fisher D; Hattle M; Marlin N; Hoogland J; Gueyffier F; Staessen JA; Wang J; Moons KGM; Reitsma JB; Ensor J
    Stat Med; 2020 Jul; 39(15):2115-2137. PubMed ID: 32350891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An evaluation of bivariate random-effects meta-analysis for the joint synthesis of two correlated outcomes.
    Riley RD; Abrams KR; Lambert PC; Sutton AJ; Thompson JR
    Stat Med; 2007 Jan; 26(1):78-97. PubMed ID: 16526010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A matrix-based method of moments for fitting the multivariate random effects model for meta-analysis and meta-regression.
    Jackson D; White IR; Riley RD
    Biom J; 2013 Mar; 55(2):231-45. PubMed ID: 23401213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A bivariate approach to meta-analysis.
    Van Houwelingen HC; Zwinderman KH; Stijnen T
    Stat Med; 1993 Dec; 12(24):2273-84. PubMed ID: 7907813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.