168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23209006)
1. Not different is not the same as the same: how can we tell?
Drummond GB; Vowler SL
Adv Physiol Educ; 2012 Dec; 36(4):261-4. PubMed ID: 23209006
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Not different is not the same as the same: how can we tell?
Drummond GB; Vowler SL
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2012 Dec; 39(12):991-4. PubMed ID: 23919813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Not different is not the same as the same: how can we tell?
Drummond GB; Vowler SL
Microcirculation; 2012 Nov; 19(8):771-4. PubMed ID: 23164036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Not different is not the same as the same: how can we tell?
Drummond GB; Vowler SL
Exp Physiol; 2013 Feb; 98(2):351-4. PubMed ID: 23349528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Not different is not the same as the same: how can we tell?
Drummond GB; Vowler SL
Br J Pharmacol; 2013 Jan; 168(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 23252665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Not different is not the same as the same: how can we tell?
Drummond GB; Vowler SL
J Physiol; 2012 Nov; 590(21):5257-60. PubMed ID: 23118061
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Sample size estimation in diagnostic test studies of biomedical informatics.
Hajian-Tilaki K
J Biomed Inform; 2014 Apr; 48():193-204. PubMed ID: 24582925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interval estimation for the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve when data are subject to error.
Li Y; Koval JJ; Donner A; Zou GY
Stat Med; 2010 Oct; 29(24):2521-31. PubMed ID: 20684006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Are we satisfied with the way we review an article?
Aslam M; Burris HH; Zupancic JA
Adv Neonatal Care; 2009 Feb; 9(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 19212165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of seven methods for producing Affymetrix expression scores based on False Discovery Rates in disease profiling data.
Shedden K; Chen W; Kuick R; Ghosh D; Macdonald J; Cho KR; Giordano TJ; Gruber SB; Fearon ER; Taylor JM; Hanash S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():26. PubMed ID: 15705192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Area of the ROC curve when one point is available.
Katostaras T; Katostara N
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 190():219-21. PubMed ID: 23823428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measurement error and confidence intervals for ROC curves.
Tosteson TD; Buonaccorsi JP; Demidenko E; Wells WA
Biom J; 2005 Aug; 47(4):409-16. PubMed ID: 16161800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Setting sample size to ensure narrow confidence intervals for precise estimation of population values.
Corty EW; Corty RW
Nurs Res; 2011; 60(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 21336224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Resampling techniques in the analysis of non-binormal ROC data.
Mossman D
Med Decis Making; 1995; 15(4):358-66. PubMed ID: 8544679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Power analysis.
Allison SC
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2004 Mar; 34(3):150-1; author reply 151-2. PubMed ID: 15089028
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A statistics primer. Hypothesis testing.
Kuhn JE; Greenfield ML; Wojtys EM
Am J Sports Med; 1996; 24(5):702-3. PubMed ID: 8883697
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability of nutritional screening and assessment tools.
Jones JM
Nutrition; 2004 Mar; 20(3):307-11. PubMed ID: 14990273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multiplicity adjustment big and small in clinical studies.
Hsu JC
Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2010 Aug; 88(2):251-4. PubMed ID: 20592727
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Confidence interval estimation for sensitivity at a fixed level of specificity for combined biomarkers.
Tian L
J Biopharm Stat; 2013 May; 23(3):499-512. PubMed ID: 23611191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Identifying and assessing the null hypothesis.
Luft HS
Health Serv Res; 2000 Feb; 34(6):1265-71. PubMed ID: 10654829
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
