168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23209006)
21. Minimize the use of minimization with unequal allocation.
Proschan M; Brittain E; Kammerman L
Biometrics; 2011 Sep; 67(3):1135-41. PubMed ID: 21281276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Epidemiological studies based on small sample sizes--a statistician's point of view.
Ersbøll AK; Ersbøll BK
Acta Vet Scand Suppl; 2003; 98():127-40. PubMed ID: 15259786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Biases induced by pooling samples in microarray experiments.
Mary-Huard T; Daudin JJ; Baccini M; Biggeri A; Bar-Hen A
Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 23(13):i313-8. PubMed ID: 17646312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Why we permute blocks?
Bangdiwala SI
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot; 2015; 22(3):278-80. PubMed ID: 26230294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparing the likelihood ratios of two binary diagnostic tests in the presence of partial verification.
Roldán Nofuentes JA; Luna del Castillo JD
Biom J; 2005 Aug; 47(4):442-57. PubMed ID: 16161803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Use of the Fieller-Hinkley distribution of the ratio of random variables in testing for noninferiority.
Koti KM
J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(2):215-28. PubMed ID: 17365219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Challenging the validity of conclusions based on P-values alone: a critique of contemporary clinical research design and methods.
Ebramzadeh E; McKellop H; Dorey F; Sarmiento A
Instr Course Lect; 1994; 43():587-600. PubMed ID: 9097190
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Basic philosophy of statistical tests, confidence intervals and sample size determination.
Indrayan A; Satyanarayana L
Indian Pediatr; 2000 Jul; 37(7):739-51. PubMed ID: 10906806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Rank-invariant resampling based estimation of false discovery rate for analysis of small sample microarray data.
Jain N; Cho H; O'Connell M; Lee JK
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 6():187. PubMed ID: 16042779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A modified sign test for comparing paired ROC curves.
Braun TM; Alonzo TA
Biostatistics; 2008 Apr; 9(2):364-72. PubMed ID: 17925302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Power and sample size: how many patients do I need?
Grunkemeier GL; Jin R
Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 Jun; 83(6):1934-9. PubMed ID: 17532374
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. New tests for null hypothesis of non unity ratio of proportions.
Koti KM
J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(2):229-45. PubMed ID: 17365220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Reporting research results: recommendations for improving communication.
Cooper RJ; Wears RL; Schriger DL
Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Apr; 41(4):561-4. PubMed ID: 12658257
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. More advanced statistical methods for quality assurance, test validation, and interpretation.
Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 516():467-516. PubMed ID: 19219594
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Tests of equivalence and non-inferiority for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired areas under ROC curves.
Liu JP; Ma MC; Wu CY; Tai JY
Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1219-38. PubMed ID: 16158400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Use of statistical methods in dental research: comparison of four dental journals during a 10-year period.
Vähänikkilä H; Nieminen P; Miettunen J; Larmas M
Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(4):206-11. PubMed ID: 19308754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Constructing bootstrap confidence intervals for principal component loadings in the presence of missing data: a multiple-imputation approach.
van Ginkel JR; Kiers HA
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):498-515. PubMed ID: 21973098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. How many readers and cases does one need to conduct an ROC study?
Chakraborty DP
Acad Radiol; 2011 Feb; 18(2):127-8. PubMed ID: 21232680
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Sampling techniques, confidence intervals, and sample size.
Indrayan A; Gupta P
Natl Med J India; 2000; 13(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 10743375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Sample size determination for the false discovery rate.
Pounds S; Cheng C
Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(23):4263-71. PubMed ID: 16204346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
