BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23210309)

  • 1. Roles of scale, matrix, and native habitat in supporting a diverse suburban pollinator assemblage.
    Hinners SJ; Kearns CA; Wessman CA
    Ecol Appl; 2012 Oct; 22(7):1923-35. PubMed ID: 23210309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Chicago Bees: Urban Areas Support Diverse Bee Communities but With More Non-Native Bee Species Compared to Suburban Areas.
    Gruver A; CaraDonna P
    Environ Entomol; 2021 Aug; 50(4):982-994. PubMed ID: 34114612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Livestock grazing is associated with seasonal reduction in pollinator biodiversity and functional dispersion but cheatgrass invasion is not: Variation in bee assemblages in a multi-use shortgrass prairie.
    Thapa-Magar KB; Davis TS; Kondratieff B
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0237484. PubMed ID: 33332351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multi-scalar drivers of biodiversity: local management mediates wild bee community response to regional urbanization.
    Ballare KM; Neff JL; Ruppel R; Jha S
    Ecol Appl; 2019 Apr; 29(3):e01869. PubMed ID: 30892745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Floral and nesting resources, habitat structure, and fire influence bee distribution across an open-forest gradient.
    Grundel R; Jean RP; Frohnapple KJ; Glowacki GA; Scott PE; Pavlovic NB
    Ecol Appl; 2010 Sep; 20(6):1678-92. PubMed ID: 20945767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Profiling crop pollinators: life history traits predict habitat use and crop visitation by Mediterranean wild bees.
    Pisanty G; Mandelik Y
    Ecol Appl; 2015 Apr; 25(3):742-52. PubMed ID: 26214919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hedgerow restoration promotes pollinator populations and exports native bees to adjacent fields.
    Morandin LA; Kremen C
    Ecol Appl; 2013 Jun; 23(4):829-39. PubMed ID: 23865233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bee community shifts with landscape context in a tropical countryside.
    Brosi BJ; Daily GC; Ehrlich PR
    Ecol Appl; 2007 Mar; 17(2):418-30. PubMed ID: 17489249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trait-specific responses of wild bee communities to landscape composition, configuration and local factors.
    Hopfenmüller S; Steffan-Dewenter I; Holzschuh A
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e104439. PubMed ID: 25137311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of suburbanization on forest bee communities.
    Carper AL; Adler LS; Warren PS; Irwin RE
    Environ Entomol; 2014 Apr; 43(2):253-62. PubMed ID: 24533967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of urbanization on bee communities depends on floral resource availability and bee functional traits.
    Wilson CJ; Jamieson MA
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0225852. PubMed ID: 31790482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sweat bees on hot chillies: provision of pollination services by native bees in traditional slash-and-burn agriculture in the Yucatán Peninsula of tropical Mexico.
    Landaverde-González P; Quezada-Euán JJG; Theodorou P; Murray TE; Husemann M; Ayala R; Moo-Valle H; Vandame R; Paxton RJ
    J Appl Ecol; 2017 Dec; 54(6):1814-1824. PubMed ID: 29200497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Landscape and local site variables differentially influence pollinators and pollination services in urban agricultural sites.
    Bennett AB; Lovell S
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0212034. PubMed ID: 30759171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. B.Y.O. Bees: Managing wild bee biodiversity in urban greenspaces.
    Anderson M; Crubaugh F; Greenslit C; Hill E; Kroth H; Stanislawski E; Ribbons R; Del Toro I
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(4):e0281468. PubMed ID: 37099521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rangeland sharing by cattle and bees: moderate grazing does not impair bee communities and resource availability.
    Shapira T; Henkin Z; Dag A; Mandelik Y
    Ecol Appl; 2020 Apr; 30(3):e02066. PubMed ID: 31872932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Harvesting effects on wild bee communities in bioenergy grasslands depend on nesting guild.
    Spiesman BJ; Bennett A; Isaacs R; Gratton C
    Ecol Appl; 2019 Mar; 29(2):e01828. PubMed ID: 30412332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of human disturbance on bee communities in a forested ecosystem.
    Winfree R; Griswold T; Kremen C
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Feb; 21(1):213-23. PubMed ID: 17298527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fragmentation of nest and foraging habitat affects time budgets of solitary bees, their fitness and pollination services, depending on traits: Results from an individual-based model.
    Everaars J; Settele J; Dormann CF
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0188269. PubMed ID: 29444076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Foraging traits modulate stingless bee community disassembly under forest loss.
    Lichtenberg EM; Mendenhall CD; Brosi B
    J Anim Ecol; 2017 Oct; 86(6):1404-1416. PubMed ID: 28833132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bee pollinator functional responses and functional effects in restored tropical forests.
    Montoya-Pfeiffer PM; Rodrigues RR; Alves Dos Santos I
    Ecol Appl; 2020 Apr; 30(3):e02054. PubMed ID: 31828842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.