157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23210764)
1. Comparison of fixed tilt and tuned defibrillation waveforms: the PROMISE study.
Gold MR; Val-Mejias J; Cuoco F; Siddiqui M
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2013 Mar; 24(3):323-7. PubMed ID: 23210764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. "Tuned" defibrillation waveforms outperform 50/50% tilt defibrillation waveforms: a randomized multi-center study.
Natarajan S; Henthorn R; Burroughs J; Esberg D; Zweibel S; Ross T; Kroll M; Gianola D; Oza A
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Jan; 30 Suppl 1():S139-42. PubMed ID: 17302691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficacy of tuned waveforms based on different membrane time constants on defibrillation thresholds: primary results from the POWER trial.
Doshi SK; Pittaro MD; Reeves R; Boyce K; Payne JP; Kroll MW; Graumann RJ; Oza AL; Val-Mejias JE
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2012 Oct; 35(10):1253-61. PubMed ID: 22906140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective randomized comparison of 50%/50% versus 65%/65% tilt biphasic waveform on defibrillation in humans.
Sweeney MO; Natale A; Volosin KJ; Swerdlow CD; Baker JH; Degroot P
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Jan; 24(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 11227971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Achieving sufficient safety margins with fixed duration waveforms and the use of multiple time constants.
Keane D; Aweh N; Hynes B; Sheahan RG; Cripps T; Bashir Y; Zaidi A; Fahy G; Lowe M; Doherty P; Kroll MK
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 May; 30(5):596-602. PubMed ID: 17461867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Defibrillation thresholds with right pectoral implantable cardioverter defibrillators and impact of waveform tuning (the Tilt and Tune trial).
Varma N; Schaerf R; Kalbfleisch S; Pimentel R; Kroll MW; Oza A
Europace; 2017 Nov; 19(11):1810-1817. PubMed ID: 27986795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimization of superior vena cava coil position and usage for transvenous defibrillation.
Gold M; Val-Mejias J; Leman RB; Tummala R; Goyal S; Kluger J; Kroll M; Oza A
Heart Rhythm; 2008 Mar; 5(3):394-9. PubMed ID: 18313597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimization of atrial defibrillation with a dual-coil, active pectoral lead system.
Rashba EJ; Shorofsky SR; Peters RW; Gold MR
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2004 Jul; 15(7):790-4. PubMed ID: 15250864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of an active abdominal pulse generator on defibrillation thresholds with a dual-coil, transvenous ICD lead system.
Rashba EJ; Farasat M; Kirk MM; Shorofsky SR; Peters RW; Gold MR
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2006 Jun; 17(6):617-20. PubMed ID: 16836709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prospective randomized comparison of 65%/65% versus 42%/42% tilt biphasic waveform on defibrillation thresholds in humans.
Shepard RK; DeGroot PJ; Pacifico A; Wood MA; Ellenbogen KA
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2003 Jun; 8(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 12815309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Benefit of millisecond waveform durations for patients with high defibrillation thresholds.
Denman RA; Umesan C; Martin PT; Forbes RN; Kroll MW; Anskey EJ; Burnett HE
Heart Rhythm; 2006 May; 3(5):536-41. PubMed ID: 16648057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Vector magnitude using orthogonal ECG leads during ventricular fibrillation is associated with defibrillation outcome.
Gurunathan S; Hsia PW; Lawton J; Hua DP
Biomed Instrum Technol; 1998; 32(1):48-61. PubMed ID: 9475962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Defibrillation efficacy of commercially available biphasic impulses in humans. Importance of negative-phase peak voltage.
Tomassoni G; Newby K; Deshpande S; Axtell K; Sra J; Akhtar M; Natale A
Circulation; 1997 Apr; 95(7):1822-6. PubMed ID: 9107169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dual-coil vs single-coil active pectoral implantable defibrillator lead systems: defibrillation energy requirements and probability of defibrillation success at multiples of the defibrillation energy requirements.
Schulte B; Sperzel J; Carlsson J; Schwarz T; Ehrlich W; Pitschner HF; Neuzner J
Europace; 2001 Jul; 3(3):177-80. PubMed ID: 11467457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prospective randomized comparison of biphasic waveform tilt using a unipolar defibrillation system.
Poole JE; Bardy GH; Kudenchuk PJ; Dolack GL; Raitt MH; Mehra R; Johnson G
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Jul; 18(7):1369-73. PubMed ID: 7567589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biphasic waveforms for ventricular defibrillation: optimization of total pulse and second phase durations.
Matula MH; Brooks MJ; Pan Q; Pless BD; Province RA; Echt DS
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Sep; 20(9 Pt 1):2154-62. PubMed ID: 9309738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Low-tilt monophasic and biphasic waveforms compared with standard biphasic waveforms in the transvenous defibrillation of ventricular fibrillation.
Bennett JR; Darragh KM; Walsh SJ; Allen DJ; Scott M; Stevenson M; Adgey JA; Anderson JM; Manoharan G
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2014 Mar; 37(3):279-89. PubMed ID: 24102186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. ICD waveform optimization: a randomized, prospective, pair-sampled multicenter study.
Mouchawar G; Kroll M; Val-Mejias JE; Schwartzman D; McKenzie J; Fitzgerald D; Prater S; Katcher M; Fain E; Syed Z
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Nov; 23(11 Pt 2):1992-5. PubMed ID: 11139975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimization of biphasic waveforms for human nonthoracotomy defibrillation.
Swartz JF; Fletcher RD; Karasik PE
Circulation; 1993 Dec; 88(6):2646-54. PubMed ID: 8252675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lack of benefit of an active pectoral pulse generator on atrial defibrillation thresholds.
Gold MR; Shorofsky SR; Bouhouch R; Joy RA; Kirby DS; Osman AF; Rashba EJ
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2002 Apr; 13(4):332-5. PubMed ID: 12033348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
