431 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23211063)
1. Practice-based clinical evaluation of metal-ceramic and zirconia molar crowns: 3-year results.
Rinke S; Schäfer S; Lange K; Gersdorff N; Roediger M
J Oral Rehabil; 2013 Mar; 40(3):228-37. PubMed ID: 23211063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A practice-based clinical evaluation of the survival and success of metal-ceramic and zirconia molar crowns: 5-year results.
Rinke S; Kramer K; Bürgers R; Roediger M
J Oral Rehabil; 2016 Feb; 43(2):136-44. PubMed ID: 26393865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Zirconia-based versus metal-based single crowns veneered with overpressing ceramic for restoration of posterior endodontically treated teeth: 5-year results of a randomized controlled clinical study.
Monaco C; Llukacej A; Baldissara P; Arena A; Scotti R
J Dent; 2017 Oct; 65():56-63. PubMed ID: 28736293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic single-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) generated with two CAD/CAM systems compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal single-unit posterior FDPs: a 5-year clinical prospective study.
Vigolo P; Mutinelli S
J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 22339945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Complication rate of molar crowns: a practice-based clinical evaluation.
Rinke S; Schäfer S; Roediger M
Int J Comput Dent; 2011; 14(3):203-18. PubMed ID: 22141230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour.
Larsson C
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (213):9-84. PubMed ID: 21919311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. All-ceramic, bi-layered crowns supported by zirconia implants: Three-year results of a prospective multicenter study.
Spies BC; Balmer M; Jung RE; Sailer I; Vach K; Kohal RJ
J Dent; 2017 Dec; 67():58-65. PubMed ID: 28939484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of incisal veneering porcelain thickness of two metal ceramic crown systems on failure resistance after cyclic loading.
Geminiani A; Lee H; Feng C; Ercoli C
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 May; 103(5):275-82. PubMed ID: 20416410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. All-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Studies on aluminum oxide- and zirconium dioxide-based ceramic systems.
Vult von Steyern P
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2005; (173):1-69. PubMed ID: 16001730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective 10-year study of metal ceramic single crowns and fixed dental prosthesis retainers in private practice settings.
Reitemeier B; Hänsel K; Kastner C; Weber A; Walter MH
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Mar; 109(3):149-55. PubMed ID: 23522363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Retrievable metal ceramic implant-supported fixed prostheses with milled titanium frameworks and all-ceramic crowns: retrospective clinical study with up to 10 years of follow-up.
Maló P; de Araújo Nobre M; Borges J; Almeida R
J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):256-64. PubMed ID: 22339902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A four-year prospective clinical evaluation of zirconia and metal-ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses.
Pelaez J; Cogolludo PG; Serrano B; Serrano JF; Suarez MJ
Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(5):451-8. PubMed ID: 22930766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fracture mode during cyclic loading of implant-supported single-tooth restorations.
Hosseini M; Kleven E; Gotfredsen K
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Aug; 108(2):74-83. PubMed ID: 22867804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Zirconia versus metal: a preliminary comparative analysis of ceramic veneer behavior.
Augstin-Panadero R; Fons-Font A; Roman-Rodriguez JL; Granell-Ruiz M; del Rio-Highsmith J; Sola-Ruiz MF
Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(3):294-300. PubMed ID: 22545261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High-strength CAD/CAM-fabricated veneering material sintered to zirconia copings--a new fabrication mode for all-ceramic restorations.
Beuer F; Schweiger J; Eichberger M; Kappert HF; Gernet W; Edelhoff D
Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):121-8. PubMed ID: 18620748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Survival and chipping of zirconia-based and metal-ceramic implant-supported single crowns.
Schwarz S; Schröder C; Hassel A; Bömicke W; Rammelsberg P
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e119-25. PubMed ID: 21985745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of substructure design, veneer application technique, and firing regime on the in vitro performance of molar zirconia crowns.
Preis V; Letsch C; Handel G; Behr M; Schneider-Feyrer S; Rosentritt M
Dent Mater; 2013 Jul; 29(7):e113-21. PubMed ID: 23726361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Randomized controlled clinical trial of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses: a 3-year follow-up.
Sailer I; Gottnerb J; Kanelb S; Hammerle CH
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 19918588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of veneering porcelain thickness of all-ceramic and metal ceramic crowns on failure resistance after cyclic loading.
Shirakura A; Lee H; Geminiani A; Ercoli C; Feng C
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Feb; 101(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 19167536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical performance of scientifically designed, hot isostatic-pressed (HIP'd) zirconia cores in a bilayered all-ceramic system.
Keough BE; Kay HB; Sager RD; Keen E
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2011; 32(6):58-68. PubMed ID: 21894876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]