111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23211142)
1. Evaluation of fixation disparity curve with the modified near Mallett unit and the wesson fixation disparity card in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects.
Momeni-Moghaddam H; Yekta AA; Ehsani M; Kundart J
Strabismus; 2012 Dec; 20(4):166-74. PubMed ID: 23211142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of fixation disparity curve variables measured with the Sheedy Disparometer and the Wesson Fixation Disparity Card.
Goss DA; Patel J
Optom Vis Sci; 1995 Aug; 72(8):580-8. PubMed ID: 8539027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of fixation disparity curve parameters with the modified near mallett unit in symptomatic and asymptomatic university students.
Momeni Moghadam H; A Goss D; Yekta AA; Ehsani M
Iran Red Crescent Med J; 2013 Nov; 15(11):e8572. PubMed ID: 24719687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Mallett Fixation Disparity Test: influence of test instructions and relationship with symptoms.
Karania R; Evans BJ
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Sep; 26(5):507-22. PubMed ID: 16918777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the presence of a central fusion lock effect on fixation disparity curve parameters in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects.
Mirzaeian M; Hashemi H; Narooie-Noori F; Nabovati P; Yekta A; Sardari S; Ostadimoghaddam H; Doostdar A; Khabazkhoob M
Clin Exp Optom; 2021 Jul; 104(5):617-624. PubMed ID: 33751916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of fixation disparity curve parameters obtained with the Wesson and Saladin fixation disparity cards.
Ngan J; Goss DA; Despirito J
Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jan; 82(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 15630407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparisons of commercially available devices for the measurement of fixation disparity and associated phorias.
Brownlee GA; Goss DA
J Am Optom Assoc; 1988 Jun; 59(6):451-60. PubMed ID: 3403890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does an iPad fixation disparity test give equivalent results to the Mallett near fixation disparity test?
Parmar KR; Dickinson C; Evans BJW
J Optom; 2019; 12(4):222-231. PubMed ID: 31501055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Agreement of Fixation Disparity Curve between Two Different Instruments.
Hashemi H; Mirzaeian M; Narooie F; Nabovati P; Yekta A; Ostadimoghaddam H; Sardari S; Khabazkhoob M
Optom Vis Sci; 2021 Jun; 98(6):629-635. PubMed ID: 34081653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of associated heterophoria measurements using the Mallett test for near vision and the Sheedy Disparometer.
Pickwell LD; Gilchrist JM; Hesler J
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1988; 8(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 3419825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Repeatability of Associated Phoria Tests.
Alhassan M; Hovis JK; Chou RB
Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Aug; 92(8):900-7. PubMed ID: 26099058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Wesson and modified Sheedy fixation disparity tests. Do fixation disparity measures relate to normal binocular status?
van Haeringen R; McClurg P; Cameron KD
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1986; 6(4):397-400. PubMed ID: 3627800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of fixation disparity measurements obtained with the Wesson Fixation Disparity Card and the Sheedy Disparometer.
Dittemore D; Crum J; Kirschen D
Optom Vis Sci; 1993 May; 70(5):414-20. PubMed ID: 8515972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Methods for measuring the proximity-fixation-disparity curve.
Jaschinski W
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2001 Sep; 21(5):368-75. PubMed ID: 11563424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of fixation disparity measured by saladin card and disparometer.
Frantz KA; Elston P; Michalik E; Templeman CD; Zoltoski RK
Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Jun; 88(6):E733-41. PubMed ID: 21423065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Fixation disparity with the Pola pointing test: not representative for eye position under natural viewing conditions].
Gerling J; Ball M; Bömer T; Bach M; Kommerell G
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1998 Apr; 212(4):226-33. PubMed ID: 9644669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The characteristics of near prism induced fixation disparity curve in Hong Kong Chinese.
Kwan LK; Lam AK; Kwan CK; Yeung PH
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1999 Sep; 19(5):393-400. PubMed ID: 10768020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of disparometer fixation disparity curves as measured with and without the phoropter.
Frantz KA; Scharre JE
Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Feb; 67(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 2336250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Unstable Binocular Fixation Affects Reaction Times But Not Implicit Motor Learning in Dyslexia.
Przekoracka-Krawczyk A; Brenk-Krakowska A; Nawrot P; Rusiak P; Naskrecki R
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2017 Dec; 58(14):6470-6480. PubMed ID: 29288270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of illumination and foveal fusion lock on clinical fixation disparity measurements with the Sheedy Disparometer.
Wildsoet CF; Cameron KD
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1985; 5(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 4022649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
