198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23211748)
1. Reliability of adenoma detection rate is based on procedural volume.
Do A; Weinberg J; Kakkar A; Jacobson BC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Mar; 77(3):376-80. PubMed ID: 23211748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measurement of polypectomy rate by using administrative claims data with validation against the adenoma detection rate.
Patel NC; Islam RS; Wu Q; Gurudu SR; Ramirez FC; Crowell MD; Faigel DO
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Mar; 77(3):390-4. PubMed ID: 23199647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality of colonoscopy withdrawal technique and variability in adenoma detection rates (with videos).
Lee RH; Tang RS; Muthusamy VR; Ho SB; Shah NK; Wetzel L; Bain AS; Mackintosh EE; Paek AM; Crissien AM; Saraf LJ; Kalmaz DM; Savides TJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Jul; 74(1):128-34. PubMed ID: 21531410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adenoma detection rate is necessary but insufficient for distinguishing high versus low endoscopist performance.
Wang HS; Pisegna J; Modi R; Liang LJ; Atia M; Nguyen M; Cohen H; Ohning G; van Oijen M; Spiegel BM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jan; 77(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 23261096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures.
Kahi CJ; Ballard D; Shah AS; Mears R; Johnson CS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):925-31. PubMed ID: 23472996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An endoscopic quality improvement program improves detection of colorectal adenomas.
Coe SG; Crook JE; Diehl NN; Wallace MB
Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Feb; 108(2):219-26; quiz 227. PubMed ID: 23295274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors determining the quality of screening colonoscopy: a prospective study on adenoma detection rates, from 12,134 examinations (Berlin colonoscopy project 3, BECOP-3).
Adler A; Wegscheider K; Lieberman D; Aminalai A; Aschenbeck J; Drossel R; Mayr M; Mroß M; Scheel M; Schröder A; Gerber K; Stange G; Roll S; Gauger U; Wiedenmann B; Altenhofen L; Rosch T
Gut; 2013 Feb; 62(2):236-41. PubMed ID: 22442161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Anatomic and advanced adenoma detection rates as quality metrics determined via natural language processing.
Gawron AJ; Thompson WK; Keswani RN; Rasmussen LV; Kho AN
Am J Gastroenterol; 2014 Dec; 109(12):1844-9. PubMed ID: 24935271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of exclusion criteria on a physician's adenoma detection rate.
Marcondes FO; Dean KM; Schoen RE; Leffler DA; Rose S; Morris M; Mehrotra A
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Oct; 82(4):668-75. PubMed ID: 26385275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endoscopist characteristics that influence the quality of colonoscopy.
Jover R; Zapater P; Bujanda L; Hernández V; Cubiella J; Pellisé M; Ponce M; Ono A; Lanas A; Seoane A; Marín-Gabriel JC; Chaparro M; Cacho G; Herreros-de-Tejada A; Fernández-Díez S; Peris A; Nicolás-Pérez D; Murcia O; Castells A; Quintero E;
Endoscopy; 2016 Mar; 48(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 26845473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identification of physicians with unusual performance in screening colonoscopy databases: a Bayesian approach.
Stock C; Uhlmann L; Hoffmeister M; Laux G; Kieser M; Brenner H
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Mar; 81(3):646-654.e1. PubMed ID: 25523387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of video recording colonoscopy on adenoma detection rates.
Madhoun MF; Tierney WM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 21963062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Advanced adenoma detection rate is independent of nonadvanced adenoma detection rate.
Greenspan M; Rajan KB; Baig A; Beck T; Mobarhan S; Melson J
Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Aug; 108(8):1286-92. PubMed ID: 23711625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adenoma detection rate varies greatly during colonoscopy training.
van Doorn SC; Klanderman RB; Hazewinkel Y; Fockens P; Dekker E
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Jul; 82(1):122-9. PubMed ID: 25817896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improving measurement of the adenoma detection rate and adenoma per colonoscopy quality metric: the Indiana University experience.
Kahi CJ; Vemulapalli KC; Johnson CS; Rex DK
Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Mar; 79(3):448-54. PubMed ID: 24246797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Physician report cards and implementing standards of practice are both significantly associated with improved screening colonoscopy quality.
Keswani RN; Yadlapati R; Gleason KM; Ciolino JD; Manka M; O'Leary KJ; Barnard C; Pandolfino JE
Am J Gastroenterol; 2015 Aug; 110(8):1134-9. PubMed ID: 25869388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Defining Benchmarks for Adenoma Detection Rate and Adenomas Per Colonoscopy in Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy Due to a Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test.
Hilsden RJ; Bridges R; Dube C; McGregor SE; Naugler C; Rose SM; Rostom A; Heitman SJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2016 Dec; 111(12):1743-1749. PubMed ID: 27725649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Endoscopist Fatigue May Contribute to a Decline in the Effectiveness of Screening Colonoscopy.
Lee CK; Cha JM; Kim WJ
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2015 Jul; 49(6):e51-6. PubMed ID: 25110871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Variable Endoscopist performance in proximal and distal adenoma detection during colonoscopy: a retrospective cohort study.
James P; Hegagi M; Hegagi M; Antonova L; Rostom A; Dube C; Murthy S; Goel R; Chatterjee A
BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 May; 18(1):73. PubMed ID: 29848305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of adenoma detection rate benchmarks in women versus men.
Coe SG; Wallace MB
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Apr; 77(4):631-5. PubMed ID: 23375528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
