These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23212000)

  • 1. Seabird aggregative patterns: a new tool for offshore wind energy risk assessment.
    Christel I; Certain G; Cama A; Vieites DR; Ferrer X
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2013 Jan; 66(1-2):84-91. PubMed ID: 23212000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mapping seabird sensitivity to offshore wind farms.
    Bradbury G; Trinder M; Furness B; Banks AN; Caldow RW; Hume D
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e106366. PubMed ID: 25210739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Challenges and solutions of remote sensing at offshore wind energy developments.
    Kelly TA; West TE; Davenport JK
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2009 Nov; 58(11):1599-604. PubMed ID: 19828157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Avian sensitivity to mortality: prioritising migratory bird species for assessment at proposed wind farms.
    Desholm M
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jun; 90(8):2672-9. PubMed ID: 19299065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing vulnerability of marine bird populations to offshore wind farms.
    Furness RW; Wade HM; Masden EA
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Apr; 119():56-66. PubMed ID: 23454414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Barriers to movement: Modelling energetic costs of avoiding marine wind farms amongst breeding seabirds.
    Masden EA; Haydon DT; Fox AD; Furness RW
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2010 Jul; 60(7):1085-91. PubMed ID: 20188382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Likely effects of construction of Scroby Sands offshore wind farm on a mixed population of harbour Phoca vitulina and grey Halichoerus grypus seals.
    Skeate ER; Perrow MR; Gilroy JJ
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2012 Apr; 64(4):872-81. PubMed ID: 22333892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of an Offshore Wind Farm (OWF) on the Common Shore Crab Carcinus maenas: Tagging Pilot Experiments in the Lillgrund Offshore Wind Farm (Sweden).
    Langhamer O; Holand H; Rosenqvist G
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0165096. PubMed ID: 27780212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Collision and displacement vulnerability to offshore wind energy infrastructure among marine birds of the Pacific Outer Continental Shelf.
    Kelsey EC; Felis JJ; Czapanskiy M; Pereksta DM; Adams J
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Dec; 227():229-247. PubMed ID: 30195148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the responses of coastal cetaceans to the construction of offshore wind turbines.
    Thompson PM; Lusseau D; Barton T; Simmons D; Rusin J; Bailey H
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2010 Aug; 60(8):1200-8. PubMed ID: 20413133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantifying avian avoidance of offshore wind turbines: Current evidence and key knowledge gaps.
    Cook ASCP; Humphreys EM; Bennet F; Masden EA; Burton NHK
    Mar Environ Res; 2018 Sep; 140():278-288. PubMed ID: 29980294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Markov model for planning and permitting offshore wind energy: A case study of radio-tracked terns in the Gulf of Maine, USA.
    Cranmer A; Smetzer JR; Welch L; Baker E
    J Environ Manage; 2017 May; 193():400-409. PubMed ID: 28258775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk formulation for the sonic effects of offshore wind farms on fish in the EU region.
    Kikuchi R
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2010 Feb; 60(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 19857880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting the spatial distribution of a seabird community to identify priority conservation areas in the Timor Sea.
    Lavers JL; Miller MG; Carter MJ; Swann G; Clarke RH
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Dec; 28(6):1699-709. PubMed ID: 24976050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk analysis for U.S. offshore wind farms: the need for an integrated approach.
    Staid A; Guikema SD
    Risk Anal; 2015 Apr; 35(4):587-93. PubMed ID: 25691292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimizing wildlife impacts for offshore wind energy development: Winning tradeoffs for seabirds in space and cetaceans in time.
    Best BD; Halpin PN
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0215722. PubMed ID: 31086363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An integrated assessment for wind energy in Lake Michigan coastal counties.
    Nordman E; VanderMolen J; Gajewski B; Isely P; Fan Y; Koches J; Damm S; Ferguson A; Schoolmaster C
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2015 Apr; 11(2):287-97. PubMed ID: 25377179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Commentary on "Risk Analysis for U.S. Offshore Wind Farms: The Need for an Integrated Approach".
    Ram B
    Risk Anal; 2016 Apr; 36(4):641-4. PubMed ID: 27093336
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing underwater noise levels during pile-driving at an offshore windfarm and its potential effects on marine mammals.
    Bailey H; Senior B; Simmons D; Rusin J; Picken G; Thompson PM
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2010 Jun; 60(6):888-97. PubMed ID: 20152995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of risks that are based on the aerial photography used in photogrammetric monitoring maps for environmental wind power energy plant projects.
    Can E
    Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Nov; 191(12):746. PubMed ID: 31722047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.